What-Video-Games-Have-to-Teach-us-About-Learning-and-Literacy-2003.-ilovepdf-compressed - Outros (2024)

Outros
Diego Zabot 15/10/2024

Prévia do material em texto

<p>WHAT VIDEO GAMES</p><p>HAVE TO TEACH US ABOUT</p><p>LEARNING AND LITERACY</p><p>James Paul Gee</p><p>WHAT VIDEO GAMES</p><p>HAVE TO TEACH US ABOUT</p><p>LEARNING AND L ITERACY</p><p>JAMES PAUL GEE</p><p>01 gee fm 3/13/03 12:04 PM Page i</p><p>WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US ABOUT LEARNING AND</p><p>LITERACY</p><p>Copyright © James Paul Gee, 2003.</p><p>All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any</p><p>manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief</p><p>quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.</p><p>First published in hardcover in 2003 by Palgrave Macmillan</p><p>First PALGRAVE MACMILLAN™ paperback edition: May 2004</p><p>175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 and</p><p>Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England RG21 6XS.</p><p>Companies and representatives throughout the world.</p><p>PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave</p><p>Macmillan division of St. Martin's Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.</p><p>Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom</p><p>and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union</p><p>and other countries.</p><p>ISBN 1-4039-6538-2</p><p>Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data</p><p>Gee, James Paul.</p><p>What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy / James Paul</p><p>Gee.</p><p>p. cm.</p><p>Includes bibliographical references and index.</p><p>ISBN 1-4039-6538-2</p><p>1. Video games—Psychological aspects. 2. Computer games—</p><p>Psychological aspects. 3. Learning, Psychology of. 4. Visual literacy.</p><p>5. Video games and children. I. Title: What video games have to teach us</p><p>about learning and literacy. II. Title.</p><p>GV1469.3 .G44 2003</p><p>794.8’01’9—dc21</p><p>2002038153</p><p>A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.</p><p>Design by Letra Libre.</p><p>First PALGRAVE MACMILLAN paperback edition: May 2004</p><p>10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1</p><p>Printed in the United States of America.</p><p>01 gee fm 3/1/04 2:47 PM Page ii</p><p>v v v</p><p>I dedicate this book to my six-year-old son, Sam. I originally tried</p><p>to play his computer games so I could teach him how to play</p><p>them, but in the end, things worked out just the reverse and he</p><p>taught me how to play. More, he taught me to take learning and</p><p>playing games seriously, all the while having fun. I also dedicate</p><p>the book to my twenty-two-year-old son, Justin. He didn’t play</p><p>computer or video games much as a kid, though he had no trou-</p><p>ble thoroughly trouncing me when we last visited an arcade.</p><p>Justin’s early fascination with StarWars was my first guide, Sam’s</p><p>with Pokemon, my second guide, to the powerful and creative</p><p>learning people can bring to the aspects of “popular culture” with</p><p>which they choose to identify and which they often choose to</p><p>transform for their own ends. The children, teenagers, and</p><p>neotenic adults, including my identical twin brother, and now</p><p>myself, who play computer and video games were my third.</p><p>v v v</p><p>01 gee fm 3/13/03 12:04 PM Page iii</p><p>This page intentionally left blank</p><p>CONTENTS</p><p>1. Introduction: 36 Ways to Learn a Video Game 1</p><p>2. Semiotic Domains:</p><p>Is Playing Video Games a “Waste of Time”? 13</p><p>3. Learning and Identity:</p><p>What Does It Mean to Be a Half-Elf? 51</p><p>4. Situated Meaning and Learning:</p><p>What Should You Do After You Have</p><p>Destroyed the Global Conspiracy? 73</p><p>5. Telling and Doing:</p><p>Why Doesn’t Lara Croft Obey Professor Von Croy? 113</p><p>6. Cultural Models:</p><p>Do You Want to Be the Blue Sonic or the Dark Sonic? 139</p><p>7. The Social Mind:</p><p>How Do You Get Your Corpse Back After You’ve Died? 169</p><p>8. Conclusion: Duped or Not? 199</p><p>Appendix: The 36 Learning Principles 207</p><p>References 213</p><p>Index 221</p><p>01 gee fm 3/13/03 12:04 PM Page v</p><p>This page intentionally left blank</p><p>1</p><p>INTRODUCTION:</p><p>36 WAYS TO LEARN A V IDEO GAME</p><p>I WANT TO TALK ABOUT VIDEO GAMES—YES, EVEN VIOLENT VIDEO</p><p>games—and say some positive things about them. By “video games” I mean</p><p>both games played on game platforms (such as the Sony PlayStation 2, the</p><p>Nintendo GameCube, or Microsoft’s XBox) and games played on comput-</p><p>ers. So as not to keep saying “video and computer games” all the time, I will</p><p>just say “video games.” I am mainly concerned with the sorts of video</p><p>games in which the player takes on the role of a fantasy character moving</p><p>through an elaborate world, solving various problems (violently or not), or</p><p>in which the player builds and maintains some complex entity, like an army,</p><p>a city, or even a whole civilization. There are, of course, lots of other types</p><p>of video games.</p><p>But, first, I need to say something about my previous work and how and</p><p>why I arrived here to discuss video games. In two earlier books, Social Linguis-</p><p>tics and Literacies and The Social Mind, I argued that two things that, at first</p><p>sight, look to be “mental” achievements, namely literacy and thinking, are, in</p><p>reality, also and primarily social achievements. (See the Bibliographic Note at</p><p>the end of this chapter for references to the literature relevant to this chapter.)</p><p>When you read, you are always reading something in some way. You are never</p><p>just reading “in general” but not reading anything in particular. For example,</p><p>you can read the Bible as history or literature or as a self-help guide or in many</p><p>other ways. So, too, with any other text, whether legal tract, comic book, essay,</p><p>or novel. Different people can interpret each type of text differently.</p><p>When you think, you must think about something in some way. You are</p><p>never just thinking “in general” but not thinking anything in particular. The</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 1</p><p>2 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>argument about thinking is, in fact, the same as the argument about reading.</p><p>For example, you can think about people who kill themselves to set off a</p><p>bomb, in pursuit of some cause they believe in, as suicide bombers, murder-</p><p>ers, terrorists, freedom fighters, heroes, psychotics, or in many other differ-</p><p>ent ways. Different people can read the world differently just as they can read</p><p>different types of texts differently.</p><p>So, then, what determines how you read or think about some particular</p><p>thing? Certainly not random chemicals or electrical events in your brain, al-</p><p>though you do most certainly need a brain to read or think. Rather, what de-</p><p>termines this is your own experiences in interacting with other people who</p><p>are members of various sorts of social groups, whether these are biblical</p><p>scholars, radical lawyers, peace activists, family members, fellow ethnic group</p><p>or church members, or whatever. These groups work, through their various</p><p>social practices, to encourage people to read and think in certain ways, and</p><p>not others, about certain sorts of texts and things.</p><p>Does this mean you are not “free” to read and think as you like? No—</p><p>you can always align yourself with new people and new groups—there is no</p><p>shortage. But it does mean you cannot read or think outside of any group</p><p>whatsoever. You cannot assign asocial and private meanings to texts and</p><p>things, meanings that only you are privy to and that you cannot even be sure</p><p>you remember correctly from occasion to occasion as you read or think about</p><p>the same thing, since as a social isolate (at least in regard to meaning) you</p><p>cannot, in fact, check your memory with anyone else. The philosopher Lud-</p><p>wig Wittgenstein made this case long ago in his famous argument against the</p><p>possibility of “private languages.” There are no “private minds” either.</p><p>Does all this mean that “anything goes” and “nothing is true”? Of course</p><p>not. We humans have goals and purposes, and for some goals and purposes</p><p>some groups’ ways of reading and thinking work better than do others. But it</p><p>does mean that things are not “true” apart from any purpose or goal whatso-</p><p>ever. In the world of physics, as an academic area, if you have pushed your</p><p>stalled car until you are dripping with sweat but the car has not budged, you</p><p>have done no “work” (given how physicists use this word), but in the world of</p><p>“everyday” people, people not attempting at the moment to be physicists or</p><p>do physics, you have worked very hard indeed. Neither meaning is right or</p><p>wrong. Each belongs to a different</p><p>interacting, valuing, and believing as</p><p>more or less typical of people who are “into” the semiotic domain. Thus we</p><p>can talk about the typical ways of thinking, acting, interacting, valuing, and</p><p>believing as well as the typical sorts of social practices associated with a given</p><p>semiotic domain. This is to view the domain externally.</p><p>What I have said about viewing first-person shooter games internally or</p><p>externally applies to any semiotic domain. Take, for instance, my own aca-</p><p>demic field of linguistics, viewed as a semiotic domain. Within linguistics</p><p>there is a well-defined subdomain often referred to as theoretical linguistics</p><p>or the theory of grammar, a field largely defined by the work of the noted lin-</p><p>guist Noam Chomsky and his followers. (Even alternative views in the field</p><p>have to be defined in reference to Chomsky’s work.) If we view this semiotic</p><p>domain internally, in terms of content, we can point out that a claim like “All</p><p>human languages are equal” is a recognizable one—is recognizably a possible</p><p>piece of content—in this semiotic domain, though Chomskian linguists give</p><p>very specific meanings to words like “language” and “equal,” meanings that</p><p>are not the same as these words have in “everyday” life.</p><p>On the other hand, a claim like “God breathed life into the word” is not a</p><p>recognizable claim—is not recognizably a possible piece of content in—the</p><p>semiotic domain of theoretical linguistics. If history had been different, per-</p><p>haps there would have been a field called linguistics in which this was a possible</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 27</p><p>28 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>piece of content. But given how history did happen, and how we therefore now</p><p>define the nature of science and academic fields, this is not a possible piece of</p><p>content in the semiotic domain of theoretical linguistics.</p><p>So far, then, we have been talking about and viewing the semiotic do-</p><p>main of theoretical linguistics internally in terms of its content. But we can</p><p>also talk about and view the domain externally in terms of the ways in which</p><p>such linguists tend to think, act, interact, value, and believe when they are</p><p>being linguists. This is to ask about the sorts of identities they take on when</p><p>they are engaged with, or acting out of their connections to, the semiotic do-</p><p>main of theoretical linguistics. This is to view the domain externally.</p><p>Theoretical linguists tend to look down on people who study the social</p><p>and cultural aspects of language (people like me now). They tend to believe</p><p>that only the structural aspects of language (e.g., syntax or phonology) can be</p><p>studied rigorously and scientifically in terms of deducing conclusions from</p><p>quite abstract and mathematically based theories. In turn, they tend to see affil-</p><p>iations between themselves and “hard scientists” like physicists. Since physics</p><p>has high prestige in our society, theoretical linguistics tends to have higher</p><p>prestige within the overall field of linguistics than does, say, sociolinguistics.</p><p>The claim here is not that each and every theoretical linguist looks down</p><p>on linguists who study social and cultural affairs (though when I was a theo-</p><p>retical linguist earlier in my career I did!). Rather, the claim is that each and</p><p>every such linguist would recognize these ways of thinking and valuing as</p><p>part of the social environment in and around the field of theoretical linguis-</p><p>tics. This is to view the domain externally.</p><p>The external view of theoretical linguistics, and not the internal one, ex-</p><p>plains why this subbranch of linguistics is regularly called theoretical linguis-</p><p>tics when, in fact, people who study language socially and culturally also</p><p>engage in building and arguing over “theories” (though less abstract and</p><p>mathematically based ones). Given its assumptions about being rigorous sci-</p><p>ence in a wider culture that values physics more than literature or sociology,</p><p>for instance, this branch of linguistics has easily been able to co-opt the term</p><p>for itself. People who study language socially and culturally often use the</p><p>term “theoretical linguistics” just for Chomskian (and related) work, thereby</p><p>enacting their own “subordination.” This last comment, of course, is an ex-</p><p>ternal view on the larger semiotic domain of linguistics as a whole.</p><p>Do the internal and external aspects of a semiotic domain have anything</p><p>to do with each other? Of course, if we are talking about academic disciplines</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 28</p><p>29v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>as semiotic domains, most academics would like to think that the answer to</p><p>this question is no. But the answer is, in fact, yes. Content, the internal part</p><p>of a semiotic domain, gets made in history by real people and their social in-</p><p>teractions. They build that content—in part, not wholly—in certain ways be-</p><p>cause of the people they are (socially, historically, culturally). That content</p><p>comes to define one of their important identities in the world. As those iden-</p><p>tities develop through further social interactions, they come to affect the on-</p><p>going development and transformation of the content of the semiotic domain</p><p>in yet new ways. In turn, that new content helps further develop and trans-</p><p>form those identities. The relationship between the internal and external is</p><p>reciprocal.</p><p>I am not trying to make some postmodern relativistic point that nothing</p><p>is true or better than anything else. The potential content of a semiotic do-</p><p>main can take a great many shapes. Some of them are better than others for</p><p>certain purposes (e.g., as truth claims about grammar or language), but there</p><p>is always more than one good (and bad) shape that content can take, since</p><p>there are so many fruitful and correct facts, principles, and patterns one can</p><p>discover in the world.</p><p>For example, Noam Chomsky and his early students spoke English as</p><p>their native language and, thus, tended to use this language as their initial</p><p>database for forming their theories. These were, in fact, theories not about</p><p>English but about what is universal in language or common to the design of</p><p>all languages. This early emphasis on English (treating English as the “typi-</p><p>cal” language) gave the theory a certain sort of initial shape that helped lead</p><p>to certain developments and not others. Later the theory changed as more</p><p>languages—ones quite different from English—received more careful con-</p><p>sideration. Nonetheless, no matter how good the theory is now (assuming for</p><p>the moment the theory is good), if Chomsky and others had been speakers of</p><p>Navajo, it might be equally good now but somewhat different.</p><p>There are a myriad of things to get right and wrong, and theoretical lin-</p><p>guistics as it is now undoubtedly has some things right and some things</p><p>wrong. Theoretical linguistics as it might have been had Chomsky spoken</p><p>Navajo would have had other things right and wrong, though it may well</p><p>have had some of the same things right and wrong as well. The American</p><p>philosopher Charles Sanders Pierce argued that “in the end,” after all the ef-</p><p>forts of scientists over time, all possible theories in an area like theoretical</p><p>linguistics would converge on the “true” one. But you and I won’t be here for</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 29</p><p>30 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>“the end” of time, so we are stuck with the fact that the internal and external</p><p>aspects of semiotic domains—even academic fields and areas of science—</p><p>influence each other.</p><p>MORE ON SEMIOTIC DOMAINS:</p><p>DESIGN GRAMMARS</p><p>Semiotic domains have what I call design grammars. Each domain has an inter-</p><p>nal and an external design grammar. By an internal design grammar, I mean</p><p>the principles and patterns in terms of which one can recognize what is and</p><p>what is not acceptable or typical content in a semiotic domain. By an external</p><p>design grammar, I mean the principles and patterns in terms of which one can</p><p>recognize what is and what is not an acceptable or typical social practice and</p><p>identity in regard to the affinity group associated with a semiotic domain.</p><p>Do you know what</p><p>counts as a modernist piece of architecture? What sort</p><p>of building counts as typical or untypical of modernist architecture ? If you do,</p><p>then you know, consciously or unconsciously, the internal design grammar of</p><p>the semiotic domain of modernist architecture (as a field of interest).</p><p>If all you know is a list of all the modernist buildings ever built, then you</p><p>don’t know the internal design grammar of the domain. Why? Because if you</p><p>know the design grammar—that is, the underlying principles and patterns</p><p>that determine what counts and what doesn’t count as a piece of modernist</p><p>architecture—you can make judgments about buildings you have never seen</p><p>before or even ones never actually built, but only modeled in cardboard. If all</p><p>you have is a list, you can’t make any judgments about anything that isn’t on</p><p>your list.</p><p>Do you know what counts as thinking, acting, interacting, and valuing</p><p>like someone who is “into” modernist architecture? Can you recognize the</p><p>sorts of identities such people take on when they are in their domain? Can</p><p>you recognize what count as valued social practices to the members of the</p><p>affinity group associated with the semiotic domain of modernist architecture</p><p>and what counts as behaving appropriately in these social practices? If the an-</p><p>swer to these questions is “yes,” then you know, consciously or uncon-</p><p>sciously, the external design grammar of the semiotic domain.</p><p>Do you understand what counts and what doesn’t count as a possible</p><p>piece of content in theoretical linguistics? Do you know that claims like “All</p><p>languages are equal” (in one specific meaning) and “The basic syntactic rules</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 30</p><p>31v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>in the core grammar of any language are optimal” count as possible claims in</p><p>theoretical linguistics and that claims like “God breathed life into the word”</p><p>and “Nominalizations are very effective communicative devices in science”</p><p>don’t? Do you know why this is so, how it follows from the ways in which the</p><p>elements of the content of theoretical linguistics relate to each other as a com-</p><p>plex system? If you do, you know the internal design grammar of theoretical</p><p>linguistics. If all you know is a list of facts from the domain, you will never</p><p>know whether a claim not on your list should or shouldn’t count or even</p><p>whether the matter is open to debate or not. You can’t “go on” in the domain.</p><p>Are you aware that theoretical linguists don’t value work on the social as-</p><p>pects of language as much as they do work on the structural aspects of gram-</p><p>mar? Do you know that even when they are assessing work in the social</p><p>sciences and humanities, they tend to value logical deductive structure and</p><p>abstract theories in these domains over richly descriptive but less abstract and</p><p>less theoretical studies? Are you aware that the term “descriptive” is (or, at</p><p>least, used to be) a term of insult and “explanatory” a term of praise when</p><p>such people are talking about academic work inside and outside their field?</p><p>Do you know why? If you know things like this, you know the external de-</p><p>sign grammar of the semiotic domain of theoretical linguistics. You find cer-</p><p>tain ways of thinking, acting, and valuing expectable in the affinity group</p><p>associated with the domain, others not.</p><p>Of course, the internal and external grammars of a domain change</p><p>through time. For example, it was once common to find linguists who saw</p><p>studying issues germane to the translation of the Bible, for example into Na-</p><p>tive American languages, as a core part of their academic work and identity as</p><p>linguists. They hoped to facilitate the work of missionaries to the speakers of</p><p>these languages. They saw no conflict between doing linguistics and serving</p><p>their religious purposes at the same time. Other linguists, not involved in</p><p>Bible translation, did not necessarily dispute this at the time and often did</p><p>not withhold professional respect from such religious linguists. The external</p><p>grammar of the domain (and this was certainly influenced by the wider cul-</p><p>ture at the time) allowed a connection between linguistic work as science and</p><p>religious commitments as an overt part of that work.</p><p>Today most linguists, theoretical and otherwise, would be skeptical of any</p><p>connection between linguistic work and religion. They would not see translat-</p><p>ing the Bible into languages connected to cultures without the Bible, to facili-</p><p>tate the work of missionaries, as a central part of any branch of linguistics.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 31</p><p>32 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>Today the external design grammar of the field does not readily allow for a</p><p>connection between work as a linguist and religion, for identities as a linguist</p><p>that are formed around this connection or for social practices germane to it.</p><p>So why I am being so perverse as to use the term “design grammar” for</p><p>these matters? Because I want us to think about the fact that for any semiotic</p><p>domain, whether it is first-person shooter games or theoretical linguistics,</p><p>that domain, internally and externally, was and is designed by someone. But</p><p>who was/is this someone who designed the semiotic domains of first-person</p><p>shooter games and theoretical linguistics?</p><p>Obviously real game designers and producers determine what counts as</p><p>recognizable content for first-person shooter games by actually making such</p><p>games. Over time, as they apply certain principles, patterns, and procedures</p><p>to the construction of such games, the content of first-person shooter games</p><p>comes to have a recognizable shape such that people not only say things like</p><p>“Oh, yeah, that’s a first-person shooter game” or “No, that’s not a first-per-</p><p>son shooter” but also “Oh, yeah, that a typical first-person shooter game” or</p><p>“Oh, no, that’s a groundbreaking first-person shooter game.”</p><p>Yet these designers and producers are only part of the people who pro-</p><p>duce the external grammar of first-person shooter games. People who play,</p><p>review, and discuss such games, as well as those who design and produce</p><p>them, shape the external design grammar of the semiotic domain of first-per-</p><p>son shooter games through their ongoing social interactions. It is their ongo-</p><p>ing social interactions that determine the principles and patterns through</p><p>which people in the domain can recognize and judge thinking, talking, read-</p><p>ing, writing, acting, interacting, valuing, and believing characteristic of peo-</p><p>ple who are in the affinity group associated with first-person shooter games.</p><p>And, of course, the acts of people helping to design the domain exter-</p><p>nally as a set of social practices and typical identities rebound on the acts of</p><p>those helping to design the domain internally as content, since that content</p><p>must “please” the members of the affinity group associated with the domain</p><p>as well as recruit newcomers to the domain. At the same time, the acts of</p><p>those helping to design the domain internally in terms of content rebound on</p><p>the acts of those helping to design the domain externally as a set of social</p><p>practices and identities, since that content shapes and transforms those prac-</p><p>tices and identities.</p><p>Just the same things can be said about those who design the semiotic do-</p><p>main of theoretical linguistics, internally and externally. Linguists who write</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 32</p><p>33v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>and publish and give talks at conferences shape the internal design grammar</p><p>of the domain through their research. They shape and transform the princi-</p><p>ples and patterns that determine what counts as the content of theoretical</p><p>linguistics.</p><p>All linguists shape the external grammar of the domain through their so-</p><p>cial interactions and the identities they take on in those interactions. It is</p><p>their ongoing social interactions and related identity work that determine the</p><p>principles and patterns through which people in the domain can recognize</p><p>and judge thinking, talking, reading, writing, acting, interacting, valuing, and</p><p>believing characteristic of people who are in the affinity group associated</p><p>with theoretical linguistics.</p><p>It is crucial, as I have pointed out, to see that the internal and external</p><p>grammars and designs of semiotic domains interrelate with each other, mutu-</p><p>ally supporting and transforming each other. Let me exemplify this point, and</p><p>further clarify the notion of design grammars, by returning to video games.</p><p>Some people play video games on game platforms like the Playstation (X</p><p>or 2), the Nintendo GameCube, or the Xbox. Some people play them on</p><p>computers like the one on which I am typing this book. When people play</p><p>video games on game platforms, they use a handheld controller with various</p><p>buttons and often a little built-in joystick or two. They never use the sort of</p><p>keyboard associated with a computer.</p><p>It is part of the external design of the semiotic domain of video games for</p><p>game platforms that games and handheld controllers go together and part of</p><p>the design of the semiotic domain of video games on computers that games</p><p>and keyboards or handheld controllers go together, since some players do, in</p><p>fact, plug handheld controllers into their computers to replace the keyboard.</p><p>So far this just seems to be a matter of brute technological facts. But</p><p>things work in the world in certain ways because people make them do so or,</p><p>at the very least, are willing to accept them as such. Then, when they work</p><p>that way, people come to expect them to do so and build values and norms</p><p>around them working that way.</p><p>One could conceivably get a keyboard to work with a game platform. At</p><p>the very least, it would be easy for designers to modify a platform so that it</p><p>would work with a keyboard. However, you don’t understand the external de-</p><p>sign grammar of the domain of platform-based video-game playing if you</p><p>don’t realize that doing this would “break the rules.” It would be a serious de-</p><p>parture from what the affinity group associated with this domain expects,</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 33</p><p>34 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>wants, and values. Many platform-game players think keyboards are a bad</p><p>way to play video games, while some computer-game players think they are a</p><p>good way. In turn, these matters are connected to their identities as game</p><p>players (e.g., the editors of PC Gamer magazine regularly “apologize” when</p><p>they have spent time playing games on a game platform and not on a com-</p><p>puter, and look down on the enterprise).</p><p>When Microsoft’s Xbox came out in 2002, it was the first game platform</p><p>to contain a computerlike hard drive. Hard drives allow games to be saved at</p><p>any point. Heretofore, games played on game platforms, thanks to the tech-</p><p>nological limitations of the platforms, could be saved much less regularly</p><p>than computer games. Players on typical game platforms, for example, can</p><p>save only at the end of a level or when they have found a special save symbol</p><p>in the game. This means that in an action game, they have to stay alive long</p><p>enough to get to the end of the level or find the save symbol, no matter how</p><p>long they already have been playing.</p><p>In a computer game, thanks to the computer’s hard drive, players can</p><p>save their progress at any time they wish. (There are some games made for</p><p>computers in which this is not true). This can make a difference in the strate-</p><p>gies one uses. When playing on a computer, the player can save after a partic-</p><p>ularly hard battle and not ever have to repeat that battle. If the player dies a</p><p>bit later, he or she starts again from the game that was saved after the big bat-</p><p>tle was already won.</p><p>On a game platform, if there was no save symbol after the big battle or if</p><p>the battle was not the end of a level, the player could not save and must move</p><p>on. If he or she dies, the big battle will have to be fought again, since the</p><p>game will reload from an earlier saved game that did not contain that battle.</p><p>Indeed, the last save could have been quite far in the past, and the player may</p><p>be required to repeat a good deal of the game.</p><p>However, again, these are not just technological matters. Platform users</p><p>do not necessarily see being unable to save whenever they want as a limita-</p><p>tion. Many of them see it as a virtue; they say it adds more excitement and</p><p>challenge to a game. Computer-game players who save after each big battle</p><p>or dangerous jump might be thought of as “wimps” who can’t last any length</p><p>of time against rigorous challenges. Furthermore, in my experience, many</p><p>platform users do not see playing large parts of a game over and over again as</p><p>repetition in the way in which I do. They see it an opportunity to perfect</p><p>their skills and get more play out of a game they enjoy.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 34</p><p>35v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>So we see here the ways in which external technological and material</p><p>facts become social facts and values. The Xbox’s coming out with a hard drive</p><p>led to a debate that anyone who understands the external design grammar of</p><p>the platform domain could have predicted. Was the Xbox really a game plat-</p><p>form? Could a real game platform have a hard drive? Perhaps the Xbox is re-</p><p>ally a computer in disguise. This is a debate over the very external design</p><p>grammar of the domain: Is the pattern “video game, game platform, hard</p><p>drive” acceptable within the external design grammar of the domain? Does it</p><p>count as an acceptable part of valued social practices and identities in the do-</p><p>main? Should it?</p><p>It is not surprising, either, that of the games Microsoft initially brought</p><p>out for the Xbox some used the hard drive to allow players to save whenever</p><p>and wherever they wanted (e.g., Max Payne) and others did not and func-</p><p>tioned like a “proper” platform game (e.g., Nightcaster). The company obvi-</p><p>ously wanted to entice both platform players and computer-game players</p><p>onto its system, though this can, in some cases, be a bit like enticing cats and</p><p>dogs to play ball together.</p><p>A good number of people play both platform games and computer</p><p>games, of course. Nonetheless, somewhat different affinity groups, with dif-</p><p>ferent attitudes and values, have arisen around each domain, with lots of</p><p>overlap in between. There are people who play in both domains but have</p><p>strong opinions about what sorts of games are best played on platforms and</p><p>what sorts are best played on computers. All this is typical: Semiotic domains</p><p>and affinity groups often don’t have sharp boundaries (though some do), and</p><p>in any case the boundaries are often fluid and changing.</p><p>Since the Xbox has the capacity to break the pattern that associates game</p><p>platforms and limited saves while still retaining some of the other patterns</p><p>typical of game platforms, it has the potential to create a new affinity group</p><p>and/or to transform old ones. In the act, it and the social interactions of peo-</p><p>ple around it might eventually create a new semiotic domain within the big-</p><p>ger domain of video-game playing, a new domain with a new external design</p><p>grammar determining new social practices and identities. Indeed, the matter</p><p>is already in progress, as the Xbox has already generated (with the help of</p><p>Microsoft, of course) its own magazines, Internet sites, and aficionados.</p><p>But all this transformation and change in the external design grammar</p><p>will rebound on and change the internal design grammar. Designers and pro-</p><p>ducers will use the hard drive on the Xbox together with its more typical</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 35</p><p>36 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>platform features to design new games. Hybrids between typical platform</p><p>games and typical computer games will arise. The distinction in content be-</p><p>tween platform games (which tended to stress fast action) and computer</p><p>games (which can store more information and stress deeper stories) may blur.</p><p>As new content arises and new principles and patterns regarding the accept-</p><p>able content of various different types of games also arise, the affinity groups</p><p>associated with those different types of games will change their social inter-</p><p>actions, values, and identities, and so, too, the external design grammar of</p><p>their respective</p><p>domains.</p><p>Some of these changes will be small, some large. But that is the way of all</p><p>semiotic domains in the world. They are made, internally and externally, by</p><p>humans and changed by them as these humans take up technological and ma-</p><p>terial circumstances in certain ways and not others and as they shape and re-</p><p>shape their social interactions with each other.</p><p>L IFEWORLDS</p><p>Our talk about semiotic domains may lead some to think that everything said</p><p>thus far only applies to “specialist” areas like video games, theoretical linguis-</p><p>tics, law, or the workings of urban gangs, not “everyday,” “ordinary” life.</p><p>However, “everyday,” “ordinary” life is itself a semiotic domain. In fact, it is a</p><p>domain in which all of us have lots and lots of experience. It is what I call the</p><p>lifeworld domain.</p><p>By the lifeworld domain I mean those occasions when we are operating</p><p>(making sense to each other and to ourselves) as “everyday” people, not as</p><p>members of more specialist or technical semiotic domains. Not everyone</p><p>does physics or plays video games, but everyone spends lots of time in his or</p><p>her lifeworld domain. And, of course, people move quite readily between</p><p>specialist domains and their lifeworld domain. For example, a group of physi-</p><p>cists at a dinner meeting might, at one moment, be discussing physics as spe-</p><p>cialists in physics and, at the next moment, be discussing the weather or</p><p>movies as “everyday” nonspecialists. (Of course, there are people who can</p><p>and do discuss the weather or movies as specialists in a specialist semiotic do-</p><p>main devoted to the weather or movies.)</p><p>Lifeworld domains are culturally variable; that is, different cultural</p><p>groups have, more or less, different ways of being, doing, feeling, valuing,</p><p>and talking as “everyday people.” Thus there are many lifeworld domains,</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 36</p><p>37v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>though they overlap enough to allow for, better or worse, communication</p><p>across cultures,</p><p>If we look at lifeworld domains internally, we can say that their content is</p><p>just the wide range of nonspecialist experiences of the world that people share</p><p>with other people with whom they share various group memberships, up to</p><p>and including the human race. Once a group has carved out an area of this ex-</p><p>perience (whether this is playing in the guise of video games or dealing with</p><p>the weather as a science) and created “specialist” ways of talking and thinking</p><p>about it (“policed” by themselves as “insiders,” who determine what is accept-</p><p>able and what not, who is adept and who is not), then they have left the life-</p><p>world (and the rest of us behind) and created a specialist semiotic domain.</p><p>If we look at lifeworld domains externally, we can ask about the ways of</p><p>thinking, talking, acting, interacting, valuing, and, in some cases, writing and</p><p>reading that allow a particular culturally distinctive group of people to recog-</p><p>nize each other as being, at a time and place, “everyday” or “ordinary” nonspe-</p><p>cialist people. For example, how do you know when a friend of yours who is a</p><p>theoretical linguist (and you are not) is talking to you and engaging with you</p><p>not as a specialist linguist but just as an “everyday” nonspecialist person? How</p><p>do you know this even when, in fact, you happen to be talking about language?</p><p>And, of course, these matters will differ if you and the linguist are from</p><p>quite different cultures—say you are an African American and the linguist is a</p><p>Russian. But, again, I caution against assuming too much variation across</p><p>human beings. People can and very often do recognize “normal” human be-</p><p>havior across cultural groups, however problematic this sometimes may be</p><p>(even to the point of leading to violence).</p><p>It is important to realize that meanings are no more general—they are</p><p>just as situated—in lifeworld domains as they are in any other semiotic do-</p><p>main. For example, in different situations, even such a mundane word as</p><p>“coffee” has different situated meanings. Consider, for instance, what hap-</p><p>pens in your head when I say “The coffee spilled, get a mop” versus “The</p><p>coffee spilled, get a broom.” In different situations, the word “coffee” can</p><p>mean a liquid, grains, beans, tins, or a flavor. It can mean yet other things in</p><p>other situations, and sometimes we have to come up with novel meanings for</p><p>the word; for example in a sentence like “Her coffee skin glistened in the</p><p>bright sunshine,” “coffee” names a skin color.</p><p>For another example, think of the different situated meanings of the</p><p>word “light” in everyday interactions in these sentences: Turn the light on.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 37</p><p>38 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>This light isn’t giving much light. I can see a far off light. I am just bathing in</p><p>this light. The effects of light in this part of the county are wonderful. The</p><p>last thing I saw was a bright light. Of course, when we consider, in the con-</p><p>text of lifeworld domains, words like “truth,” “good,” “democracy,” “fair-</p><p>ness,” “honesty,” and so forth, things get yet more variable, more deeply</p><p>rooted in specific situations in specific culturally relative lifeworld domains.</p><p>There are a number of important points to make about lifeworld do-</p><p>mains. First, we are all used to making claims to know things based not on</p><p>any specialist knowledge we have but just as “everyday” human beings. How-</p><p>ever, in the modern world, specialist domains are taking more and more</p><p>space away from lifeworld domains wherein people can make nonspecialist</p><p>claims to know things and not face a challenge from a specialist.</p><p>For example, I once lived in Los Angeles. Every nonspecialist in Los An-</p><p>geles “knows” the air is polluted and dangerous, and they are usually willing</p><p>to say so. Nonetheless, it was not at all uncommon to read in the newspaper,</p><p>say, that “lay people” didn’t really know what they were talking about (and</p><p>choking on). Specialists in the matter claimed that there was no technical</p><p>“evidence” that the air was particularly unsafe. Tobacco companies tried the</p><p>same thing for years in regard to the dangers of smoking. Companies that</p><p>pollute ground and water often engage in the same tactic when people in</p><p>their areas of operation claim to feel sick (or drop dead) from their pollution.</p><p>Helping students learn how to think about the contrasting claims of vari-</p><p>ous specialists against each other and against lifeworld claims to know certainly</p><p>ought to be a key job for schools. To do this, students would have to investigate</p><p>specialist domains and different culturally distinctive lifeworlds, internally in</p><p>terms of content and externally in terms of social practices and identities.</p><p>A second point to be made about lifeworld domains is this: In the mod-</p><p>ern world, we are used to having to face the fact that children, including our</p><p>own, are specialists when and where we are not. Many children are adept at</p><p>the semiotic domain of computers—sometimes because they play video</p><p>games and that interest has led them to learn more about computers—when</p><p>the adults in the house are intimidated by computers.</p><p>Kids have turned video games, roller-blading, skateboarding, and snow-</p><p>boarding into specialist domains that internally in terms of content and ex-</p><p>ternally in terms of social practices bewilder adults. Many children have</p><p>learned through the Internet and television more about stock trading or even</p><p>law than many of the adults around them could ever imagine knowing. (One</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 38</p><p>39v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>teenager had the top rating for legal advice on a legal Internet site in which</p><p>many of the others on the highly ranked list were professional lawyers.)</p><p>Adults are getting used to the fact that they are “immigrants” in many a</p><p>domain where their own children are “natives” (specialists). The lifeworld—</p><p>the domain in which people can claim to know and understand things as</p><p>“everyday” people and not as specialists—is shrinking, not just under the at-</p><p>tack of specialist domains like science but because our children are creating</p><p>and mastering</p><p>so many specialist domains themselves.</p><p>A third point I want to make is this: I firmly believe we need to protect</p><p>lifeworld domains from the assaults of specialists (yes, even our own children).</p><p>We need to understand and value people’s “everyday” knowledge and under-</p><p>standings. At the same time, I believe it is crucial, particularly in the contem-</p><p>porary world, that all of us, regardless of our cultural affiliations, be able to</p><p>operate in a wide variety of semiotic domains outside our lifeworld domains.</p><p>It is very often in these non-lifeworld domains that people form affilia-</p><p>tions with others outside their own cultural groups and transcend the limita-</p><p>tions of any one person’s culture and lifeworld domain. Of course, it is</p><p>important not to insult anyone’s culture or lifeworld domain; it is important,</p><p>as well, to build bridges to these when introducing people to new semiotic</p><p>domains. But in my view, it is a poor form of respect for anyone to leave peo-</p><p>ple trapped in their own culture and lifeworld as the whole and sole space</p><p>within which they can move in the modern world. If this view comports</p><p>poorly with some versions of multiculturalism, so be it.</p><p>BACK TO PIKMIN: CRIT ICAL LEARNING</p><p>If learning is to be active, it must involve experiencing the world in new ways.</p><p>I have spelled this out in terms of learning new ways to situate the meanings</p><p>of words, images, symbols, artifacts, and so forth when operating within spe-</p><p>cific situations in new semiotic domains. Active learning must also involve</p><p>forming new affiliations. I have explained this in terms of learners joining</p><p>new affinity groups associated with new semiotic domains.</p><p>Active learning in a domain also involves preparation for future learning</p><p>within the domain and within related domains. I will deal with this issue</p><p>below, when I draw a comparison between the sorts of learning that take place</p><p>when playing good video games and the sorts of learning that take place in</p><p>good science classrooms and when I discuss the notion of precursor domains.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 39</p><p>40 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>However, as I said earlier, critical learning involves yet another step. For</p><p>active learning, the learner must, at least unconsciously, understand and oper-</p><p>ate within the internal and external design grammars of the semiotic domain</p><p>he or she is learning. But for critical learning, the learner must be able con-</p><p>sciously to attend to, reflect on, critique, and manipulate those design gram-</p><p>mars at a metalevel. That is, the learner must see and appreciate the semiotic</p><p>domain as a design space, internally as a system of interrelated elements making</p><p>up the possible content of the domain and externally as ways of thinking, act-</p><p>ing, interacting, and valuing that constitute the identities of those people who</p><p>are members of the affinity group associated with the domain.</p><p>Let me return to the child playing Pikmin for a specific example of what I</p><p>mean. What does it take just to play a game as an active learner? To do this</p><p>the player must understand and produce situated meanings in the semiotic</p><p>domain that this game, and games like it, constitutes. Elements in the con-</p><p>tent of Pikmin—for example, a yellow Pikmin—do not have just one general</p><p>meaning or significance in the game world. Learners must learn to situate</p><p>different meanings for such elements within different specific situations</p><p>within the domain.</p><p>For example, when a player is faced with a rock wall, his yellow Pikmin</p><p>(who can throw bomb rocks) take on the situated meaning the type of Pikmin</p><p>who can use bombs (unlike red and blue Pikmin), since a good strategy for de-</p><p>stroying walls in the game is to have yellow Pikmin throw bombs at them.</p><p>However, when attacking a fat, sleeping, dangerous spotted creature (a</p><p>Spotty Bulborb) found throughout the first levels of the game, the yellow</p><p>Pikmin take on the situated meaning the sorts of Pikmin who can be thrown far-</p><p>ther than other sorts of Pikmin, since a good strategy when fighting big crea-</p><p>tures like these is to have Captain Olimar tell the red Pikmin to run up and</p><p>attack from the rear, while he throws the yellow Pikmin onto their backs to</p><p>attack from up top.</p><p>Additionally, players need to know what patterns or combinations of ele-</p><p>ments the game’s internal design grammar allows. They need to know, given</p><p>the situated meanings they have given to each element in the pattern or com-</p><p>bination, what the whole pattern or combination means in a situated way</p><p>useful for action.</p><p>For example, the internal design grammar of Pikmin allows the player to</p><p>bring together (by moving Captain Olimar and his Pikmin) the combination</p><p>of Pikmin, a rock wall, and a small tin can laying near the wall, containing lit-</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 40</p><p>41v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>tle rock bombs. Of course, the game did not need to allow this pattern or</p><p>combination to be able to occur; its design grammar could have been built</p><p>differently. Even given that the design grammar does allow this combination,</p><p>players still have to build a situated meaning for this combination out of the</p><p>situated meanings they have given to each element in the game based on the</p><p>situation they take themselves to be in and their own goals.</p><p>If this is a point in the game where the player needs to get past the wall,</p><p>and given the fact that he or she can build a situated meaning for yellow Pik-</p><p>min like the type of Pikmin that can throw bombs, the player can build a situated</p><p>meaning for this combination something like: Equip the yellow Pikmin with the</p><p>rock bombs and have them use the bombs to blow up the wall.</p><p>Here is another example from Pikmin of a combination of elements al-</p><p>lowable by the internal design grammar of the game. The player often finds a</p><p>Spotty Bulborb—a creature with big teeth and jaws suitable for swallowing</p><p>Pikmin whole—sleeping peacefully in a fairly exposed space. So the design</p><p>grammar of the domain allows the combination: Spotty Bulborb, sleeping, in</p><p>exposed area. Depending on what situation the player takes him- or herself</p><p>to be in, this combination can be assigned several different situated mean-</p><p>ings. For instance, it could be taken to mean: Attack the Spotty Bulborb care-</p><p>fully from the rear before it wakes up; or it could be taken to mean: Sneak quietly</p><p>by the Spotty Bulborb to get where you want to go without trouble. Nothing stops</p><p>the player from assigning the combination a more unexpected situated mean-</p><p>ing, perhaps something like: Wake the Spotty Bulborb up so you can get a more</p><p>exciting (and fair?) fight.</p><p>Since the child can successfully break down rock walls and attack Spotty</p><p>Bulborbs, he can understand (“read”) and produce (“write”) appropriate situ-</p><p>ated meanings for elements and combinations of elements in the domain</p><p>(game). But all of this is “just” playing the game in a proactive way—that is,</p><p>using situated meanings and the design grammar of the game to understand</p><p>and produce meanings and actions (which are a type of meaning in the do-</p><p>main). Of course, one could just ritualize one’s response to the game and try</p><p>pretty much the same strategy in every situation, but this would not be a</p><p>proactive way to play and learn.</p><p>All these meanings and actions are a product of what I have called active</p><p>learning, but they are not yet critical learning that leverages the design gram-</p><p>mar at a metalevel in a reflective way that can lead to critique, novel mean-</p><p>ings, or transformation of the domain. However, the child is learning to do</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 41</p><p>42 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>this as well—that is, his process of learning the game is not only active, it is</p><p>increasingly critical.</p><p>When the child had recovered 5 of the spaceship’s 30 missing parts, he</p><p>was able to search in a new area called The Forest’s Navel. This area had a</p><p>much harsher and more dangerous-looking landscape than the previous areas</p><p>the child had been in. It had different dangerous creatures, including a num-</p><p>ber of closely grouped creatures</p><p>that breathed fire. And the background</p><p>music had changed considerably. Since the player has already found five</p><p>parts, the game assumes that he is now more adept than when he began the</p><p>game; thus, the landscape and creatures are getting harder to deal with, offer-</p><p>ing a bigger challenge. At the same time, these changes in features communi-</p><p>cate a new mood, changing the tone of the game from a cute fairy tale to a</p><p>somewhat darker struggle for survival.</p><p>The child was able to think about and comment on these changes. He</p><p>said that the music was now “scary” and the landscape much harsher-looking</p><p>than the ones he had previously been in. He knew that this signaled that</p><p>things were going to get harder. Furthermore, he was aware that the changes</p><p>signaled that he needed to rethink some of his strategies as well his relation-</p><p>ship to the game. He was even able to comment on the fact that the earlier</p><p>parts of the game made it appear more appropriate for a child his age than</p><p>did the Forest Navel area and considered whether the game was now “too</p><p>scary” or not. He decided on a strategy of exploring the new area only a little</p><p>bit at a time, avoiding the fire-breathing creatures, and returning to old areas</p><p>with the new resources (e.g., blue Pikmin) he got in the Forest Navel area to</p><p>find more parts there more quickly and easily (remember, the player has only</p><p>30 game days to get all the parts and so wants to get some of them quickly</p><p>and easily.)</p><p>What we are dealing with here is talk and thinking about the (internal)</p><p>design of the game, about the game as a complex system of interrelated parts</p><p>meant to engage and even manipulate the player in certain ways. This is met-</p><p>alevel thinking, thinking about the game as a system and a designed space,</p><p>and not just playing within the game moment by moment. Such thinking can</p><p>open up critique of the game. It can also lead to novel moves and strategies,</p><p>sometimes ones that the game makers never anticipated. This is what I mean</p><p>by critical learning and thinking. Of course, the six-year-old is only begin-</p><p>ning the process of critical learning in regard to Pikmin and other video</p><p>games, but he is well begun.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 42</p><p>43v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>The child is learning to think reflectively about the internal design</p><p>grammar (the grammar of content) of Pikmin and games like it. As he inter-</p><p>acts with others, he will have opportunities to reflect on the external design</p><p>grammar (the grammar of social practices and identities) too. For example,</p><p>he has already learned that he can search the Internet for helpful tips about</p><p>playing the game, including what are called Easter Eggs (little surprises play-</p><p>ers can find in a game if they know where and how to look for them). He</p><p>considers these tips part of playing the game. On the other hand, he charac-</p><p>terizes advice about how to play as “bossing him around” and claims he can</p><p>“do his own thinking.”</p><p>These are early moments in the child’s induction into the affinity groups</p><p>associated with video-game playing, their characteristic social practices, and</p><p>the sorts of identities people take on within these groups and practices. If he</p><p>is to engage with these external aspects of game playing critically, he will</p><p>need to reflect in an overt way on the patterns and possibilities he does and</p><p>does not find in these social practices and identities. Doing this is to reflect</p><p>on the external design grammar of the domain.</p><p>Critical learning, as I am defining it here, involves learning to think of</p><p>semiotic domains as design spaces that manipulate us (if I can use this term</p><p>without necessary negative connotations) in certain ways and that we can ma-</p><p>nipulate in certain ways. The child has much more to learn about Pikmin as a</p><p>design space (internally and externally). He also has much more to learn</p><p>about not just the single game Pikmin but the genre (family) of games into</p><p>which Pikmin falls (adventure strategy games) as a design space. And he has</p><p>much more to learn about not just this genre but about video games in gen-</p><p>eral (a larger and more loosely connected family) as a design space.</p><p>Then there is the crucial matter of learning how these design spaces re-</p><p>late to each other and to other sorts of semiotic domains, some more closely</p><p>related to video games as semiotic domains, some less closely related. That is,</p><p>the child can learn how to think about, and act on, semiotic domains as a</p><p>larger design space composed of clusters (families) of more or less closely re-</p><p>lated semiotic domains.</p><p>So, then, why do I call learning and thinking at a metalevel about semiotic</p><p>domains (alone and in relation to each other) as design spaces critical learning</p><p>and thinking? For this reason: Semiotic systems are human cultural and histor-</p><p>ical creations that are designed to engage and manipulate people in certain</p><p>ways. They attempt through their content and social practices to recruit people</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 43</p><p>44 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>to think, act, interact, value, and feel in certain specific ways. In this sense, they</p><p>attempt to get people to learn and take on certain sorts of new identities, to be-</p><p>come, for a time and place, certain types of people. In fact, society as a whole is</p><p>simply the web of these many different sorts of identities and their characteris-</p><p>tic associated activities and practices.</p><p>Some of these identities constitute, within certain institutions or for cer-</p><p>tain social groups in the society, social goods. By a “social good” I mean any-</p><p>thing that a group in society, or society as a whole, sees as bringing one status,</p><p>respect, power, freedom, or other such socially valued things. Some people</p><p>have more or less access to valued or desired semiotic domains and their con-</p><p>comitant identities. Furthermore, some identities connected to some semiotic</p><p>domains may come, as one understands the domain more reflectively, to seem</p><p>less (or more) good or valuable than one had previously thought.</p><p>Finally, one might come to see that a given identity associated with a</p><p>given semiotic domain relates poorly (or well)—in terms of one’s vision of</p><p>ethics, morality, or a valued life—with one’s other identities associated with</p><p>other semiotic domains. For example, a person might come to see that a</p><p>given semiotic domain is designed so as to invite one to take on an identity</p><p>that revels in a disdain for life or in a way of thinking about race, class, or</p><p>gender that the person, in terms of other identities he or she takes on in</p><p>other semiotic domains, does not, on reflection, wish to continue. In this</p><p>sense, then, semiotic domains are inherently political (and here I am using</p><p>the term “political” in the sense of any practices where the distribution of so-</p><p>cial goods in a society is at stake).</p><p>Let me make this discussion more concrete. A game like Pikmin recruits</p><p>from the our six-year-old a complex identity composed of various related</p><p>traits. The game encourages him to think of himself an active problem solver,</p><p>one who persists in trying to solve problems even after making mistakes; one</p><p>who, in fact, does not see mistakes as errors but as opportunities for reflec-</p><p>tion and learning. It encourages him to be the sort of problem solver who,</p><p>rather than ritualizing the solutions to problems, leaves himself open to un-</p><p>doing former mastery and finding new ways to solve new problems in new</p><p>situations.</p><p>At the same time, the boy is encouraged to see himself as solving prob-</p><p>lems from the perspective of a particular fantasy creature (Captain Olimar)</p><p>and his faithful helpers (the Pikmin) and, thus, to get outside his “real” iden-</p><p>tity and play with the notions of perspectives and identities themselves. He is</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 44</p><p>45v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>also encouraged to focus on the problem-solving and fantasy aspects of his</p><p>new identity and not, say, his worries about killing (virtual) “living” creatures,</p><p>however odd they may be, though he can choose to avoid killing some of the</p><p>creatures by running from</p><p>them or sneaking around them. The learner, in this</p><p>case, gets to customize the identity the game offers him to a certain extent—</p><p>this, in fact, is an important feature of good video games.</p><p>The identity that Pikmin invites the player to take on relates in a variety</p><p>of ways to other identities he takes on in other domains. I believe, for exam-</p><p>ple, that the identity Pikmin recruits relates rather well to the sort of identity</p><p>a learner is called on to assume in the best active science learning in schools</p><p>and other sites.</p><p>If this is true, then our six-year-old is privileged in this respect over chil-</p><p>dren who do not have the opportunity to play such games (in an active and</p><p>critical way). An issue of social justice is at stake here in regard to the distri-</p><p>bution of, and access to, this identity, whether through video games or sci-</p><p>ence. We can note, as well, that the boy is using the video game to practice</p><p>this identity, for many hours, at an early age, outside of science instruction in</p><p>school, which may very well take up very little of the school day. Other chil-</p><p>dren may get to practice this identity only during the limited amount of time</p><p>their school devotes to active and critical learning in science of the sort that</p><p>lets children take on the virtual identity of being and doing science rather</p><p>than memorizing lists of facts—which often is no time at all.</p><p>VIDEO GAMES: A WASTE OF T IME?</p><p>I have now discussed a perspective on learning that stresses active and critical</p><p>learning within specific semiotic domains. So, let me now return to the</p><p>grandfather’s remark that playing video games is a waste of time because the</p><p>child is learning no “content.”</p><p>If children (or adults) are playing video games in such a way as to learn</p><p>actively and critically then they are:</p><p>1. Learning to experience (see and act on) the world in a new way</p><p>2. Gaining the potential to join and collaborate with a new affinity</p><p>group</p><p>3. Developing resources for future learning and problem solving in the</p><p>semiotic domains to which the game is related</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 45</p><p>46 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>4. Learning how to think about semiotic domains as design spaces that</p><p>engage and manipulate people in certain ways and, in turn, help cre-</p><p>ate certain relationships in society among people and groups of peo-</p><p>ple, some of which have important implications for social justice</p><p>These, of course, are just the four things one learns when engaging actively</p><p>and critically with any new semiotic domain. So the questions in regard to</p><p>any specific semiotic domain become: Are these good or valuable ways to ex-</p><p>perience the world? Is this a good or valuable affinity group to join? Are</p><p>these resources for future learning applicable to other good and valued semi-</p><p>otic domains? Is this domain leading the learner to reflect on design spaces</p><p>(and the concomitant identities they help create), and their intricate relation-</p><p>ships to each other, in ways that potentially can lead to critique, innovation,</p><p>and good or valued thinking and acting in society?</p><p>The answers to these questions will vary along a variety of parameters.</p><p>But they show that a great deal more is at stake than “content” in the grandfa-</p><p>ther’s sense. This book offers a positive answer to these questions in regard to</p><p>a good many (certainly not all) video games, as long as people are playing</p><p>them in ways that involve active and critical learning. Video games have the</p><p>potential to lead to active and critical learning. In fact, I believe that they often</p><p>have a greater potential than much learning in school (even though school</p><p>learning may involve learning “content”). Indeed, I hope my discussion of the</p><p>child playing Pikmin already suggests some of the lines of my argument.</p><p>What ensures that a person plays video games in a way that involves ac-</p><p>tive and critical learning and thinking? Nothing, of course, can ensure such a</p><p>thing. Obviously, people differ in a variety of ways, including how much they</p><p>are willing to challenge themselves, and they play video games for a great va-</p><p>riety of different purposes. But two things help to lead to active and critical</p><p>learning in playing video games.</p><p>One is the internal design of the game itself. Good games—and the</p><p>games get better in this respect all the time—are crafted in ways that encour-</p><p>age and facilitate active and critical learning and thinking (which is not to say</p><p>that every player will take up this offer). The other is the people around the</p><p>learner, other players and nonplayers. If these people encourage reflective</p><p>metatalk, thinking, and actions in regard to the design of the game, of video</p><p>games more generally, and of other semiotic domains and their complex in-</p><p>terrelationships, then this, too, can encourage and facilitate active and critical</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 46</p><p>47v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>learning and thinking (though, again, the offer may not be taken up). And,</p><p>indeed, the affinity groups connected to video games do often encourage</p><p>metareflective thinking about design, as a look at Internet game sites will</p><p>readily attest.</p><p>This last point—that other people can encourage in the learner metareflec-</p><p>tive talk, thinking, and actions in regard to a semiotic domain as a design</p><p>space—leads to another point: Often it is critical learning—focusing on the</p><p>semiotic domain one is learning as a design space in a reflective way—that actu-</p><p>ally encourages and pushes active learning. One can learn actively without much</p><p>critical learning, but one cannot really learn much critically without a good deal</p><p>of active learning in a semiotic domain. The critical is not a later add-on. It</p><p>should be central to the process of active learning from the beginning.</p><p>There is another important issue here that bears on deciding whether a</p><p>given semiotic domain—like video games—is valuable or not: Semiotic do-</p><p>mains in society are connected to other semiotic domains in a myriad of</p><p>complex ways. One of these is that a given domain can be a good precursor</p><p>for learning another one. Because mastering the meaning-making skills in,</p><p>and taking on the identity associated with, the precursor domain facilitates</p><p>learning in the other domain. Facilitation can also happen because being (or</p><p>having been) a member of the affinity group associated with the precursor</p><p>domain facilitates becoming a member of the affinity group associated with</p><p>the other domain, because the values, norms, goals, or practices of the pre-</p><p>cursor group resemble in some ways the other group’s values, norms, goals,</p><p>or practices.</p><p>Let me give a concrete example of such connections. In the larger semi-</p><p>otic domain of video games, first- and third-person shooter games are a well-</p><p>defined subdomain. However, such games often have elements that are</p><p>similar to features found in arcade games, games (like Space Invaders, Pacman,</p><p>and Frogger) that involve a good deal of fast hand-eye coordination to move</p><p>and respond quickly. (In fact, one of the original first-person shooter games,</p><p>a game that helped start the genre—Wolfenstein 3D—operates very much like</p><p>an arcade game.) Thus, someone who has mastered the domain of arcade</p><p>games has mastered a precursor domain for shooter games, though such</p><p>games now contain many other elements, as well.</p><p>On the other hand, fantasy role-playing games are another well-defined</p><p>subdomain of the video-game domain. People who have earlier played and</p><p>mastered the Dungeons and Dragons semiotic domain (as make-believe play or</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 47</p><p>48 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>with books and cards) are advantaged when they play fantasy role-playing</p><p>games, since such games developed out of Dungeons and Dragons, though they</p><p>now contain a good many additional elements.</p><p>Both the shooter domain and the fantasy role-playing domain have other</p><p>precursor domains, and they share some precursor domains (e.g., make-be-</p><p>lieve play wherein one is willing to take on different identities—a domain</p><p>that some cultures and social groups do</p><p>not encourage in children or adults).</p><p>Some of these video-game (sub-) domains may well serve as precursor do-</p><p>mains for other semiotic domains. For example, it may well be that the popu-</p><p>lar (sub-) domain of simulation games (so-called god games, like SimCity, The</p><p>Sims, Railroad Tycoon, and Tropico) could be, for some children, a precursor</p><p>domain for those sciences that heavily trade in computer-based simulations</p><p>as a method of inquiry (e.g., some types of biology and cognitive science).</p><p>In interviews my research team and I have conducted with video-game</p><p>players, we have found a number of young people who have used the domain</p><p>of video games as a fruitful precursor domain for mastering other semiotic</p><p>domains tied to computers and related technologies. Indeed, several of these</p><p>young people plan to go to college and major in computer science or related</p><p>areas.</p><p>So we can ask: Can various subdomains in the larger domain of video-</p><p>game playing serve as precursor domains facilitating later learning in and out</p><p>of school?. I believe that the sorts of active and critical learning about de-</p><p>sign—and the type of problem-solving identity—that a game like Pikmin can</p><p>involve may well relate to later learning in domains like science, at least when</p><p>we are talking about teaching and learning science as an active process of in-</p><p>quiry and not the memorization of passive facts.</p><p>I am convinced that playing video games actively and critically is not “a</p><p>waste of time.” And people playing video games are indeed (pace the six-year-</p><p>old’s grandfather), learning “content,” albeit usually not the passive content</p><p>of school-based facts. (Many games, such as the Civilization games, do con-</p><p>tain a good number of facts.) The content of video games, when they are</p><p>played actively and critically, is something like this: They situate meaning in a</p><p>multimodal space through embodied experiences to solve problems and reflect on the</p><p>intricacies of the design of imagined worlds and the design of both real and imagined</p><p>social relationships and identities in the modern world. That’s not at all that bad—</p><p>and people get wildly entertained to boot. No wonder it is hard for today’s</p><p>schools to compete.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 48</p><p>49v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>LEARNING PRINCIPLES</p><p>The discussion in this chapter suggests a variety of learning principles that</p><p>are built into good video games, games like Pikmin, as will the discussion in</p><p>each of the following chapters. Some of the learning principles suggested in</p><p>this chapter are a bit more general than are those in later chapters. Here I</p><p>bring together these principles to start a list that will continue in subsequent</p><p>chapters.</p><p>I state only five very basic principles, since quite a number of other</p><p>principles that are implicated in the earlier discussion will be discussed in</p><p>greater detail later. The order of the principles is not important. All the</p><p>principles are equally important, or nearly so. Some of the principles over-</p><p>lap and, in actuality, reflect different aspects of much the same general</p><p>theme. Furthermore, these principles are not claims about all and any video</p><p>games played in any old fashion. Rather, they are claims about the potential</p><p>of good video games played in environments that encourage overt reflec-</p><p>tion. (While good video games do indeed encourage overt reflection, this</p><p>feature can be greatly enhanced by the presence of others, both players and</p><p>viewers.)</p><p>I state each principle in a way that is intended to be equally relevant to</p><p>learning in video games and learning in content areas in classrooms.</p><p>1. Active, Critical Learning Principle</p><p>All aspects of the learning environment (including the ways in which</p><p>the semiotic domain is designed and presented) are set up to encour-</p><p>age active and critical, not passive, learning.</p><p>2. Design Principle</p><p>Learning about and coming to appreciate design and design princi-</p><p>ples is core to the learning experience.</p><p>3. Semiotic Principle</p><p>Learning about and coming to appreciate interrelations within and</p><p>across multiple sign systems (images, words, actions, symbols, arti-</p><p>facts, etc.) as a complex system is core to the learning experience.</p><p>4. Semiotic Domains Principle</p><p>Learning involves mastering, at some level, semiotic domains, and</p><p>being able to participate, at some level, in the affinity group or groups</p><p>connected to them.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 49</p><p>50 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>5. Metalevel Thinking about Semiotic Domains Principle</p><p>Learning involves active and critical thinking about the relationships</p><p>of the semiotic domain being learned to other semiotic domains.</p><p>BIBL IOGRAPHICAL NOTE</p><p>See Kress 1985, 1996, and Kress & van Leeuwen 1996, 2001 for insightful discussions</p><p>on reading images and multimodal texts, that is, texts that mix words and images. For</p><p>work on literacy as involving multiple literacies, see the citations to the New Literacy</p><p>Studies at the end of chapter 1 as well as Cope & Kalantzis 2000; Heath 1983; Scollon</p><p>& Scollon 1981; and Street 1984.</p><p>The discussion of physics students who know Newton’s laws of motion but can-</p><p>not apply them to a specific situation is taken from Chi, Feltovich, & Glaser 1981.</p><p>For further discussion, see Gardner 1991 and Mayer 1992.</p><p>On the nature of reading tests, see Hill & Larsen’s 2000 superb analyses of actual</p><p>test items in relationship to different ways of reading. On reading more generally, see</p><p>Adams 1990; Coles 1998; Gee 1991; Snow, Burns, & Griffin 1998; see Pearson 1999</p><p>for discussion of the range of controversy in the area. The “fourth-grade slump” is</p><p>discussed in Gee 1999a; see Chall 1967 for an early and influential discussion.</p><p>On Noam Chomsky’s work, see McGilvray 1999. For C. S. Peirce’s work, see</p><p>Kloesel & Houser 1992.</p><p>On semiotics and content learning, especially in regard to science education, see</p><p>Kress, Jewitt, Ogborn, & Tsatsarelis 2001; Lemke 1990; and Ogborn, Kress, Martins,</p><p>& McGillicuddy 1996. On the notion of affiliation and affinity groups, see Beck 1992,</p><p>1994; Gee 2000–2001; Rifkin 2000; and Taylor 1994. For the idea of preparation for</p><p>future learning, see Bransford & Schwartz 1999, a very important and illuminating</p><p>paper for anyone interested in learning. On the notion of design and design gram-</p><p>mars, see New London Group 1996, a “manifesto” written by an international group</p><p>of scholars (a group of which I was a member) working in the area of language and lit-</p><p>eracy studies.</p><p>My notion of critical learning combines work on situated cognition (see biblio-</p><p>graphic note for chapter 4), especially work on metacognition—see, for example</p><p>Bereiter & Scardamalia 1989; Bruer 1993: pp. 67–99; Pellegrino, Chudowsky, &</p><p>Glaser 2001; Schon 1987; and Paulo Freire’s 1995 work on critical thinking and liter-</p><p>acy as “reading the world” and not just “reading the word.” On the concept of the</p><p>lifeworld, see Habermas 1984.</p><p>For discussions of game design relevant to the concerns of this chapter, see Bates</p><p>2002 and Rouse 2001.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 50</p><p>3</p><p>LEARNING AND IDENTITY:</p><p>WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE A HALF-ELF?</p><p>ARCANUM: LEARNING AND IDENTITY</p><p>THE LAST CHAPTER ARGUED THAT SEMIOTIC DOMAINS ENCOURAGE</p><p>people new to them to take on and play with new identities. I discussed the</p><p>sort of identity as an exploratory problem solver of a certain type that the</p><p>game Pikmin encouraged the six-year-old to take on. All learning in all semi-</p><p>otic domains requires identity work. It requires taking on a new identity and</p><p>forming bridges from one’s old identities to the new one.</p><p>For example, a child in a science classroom engaged in real inquiry, and</p><p>not passive learning, must be willing to take on an identity as a certain type of</p><p>scientific thinker, problem solver, and doer. The child must see and make</p><p>connections between this new identity and other identities he or she has al-</p><p>ready formed. Certainly the child will be at a disadvantage if he or she has</p><p>one or more identities that do not fit with, are opposed to, or are threatened</p><p>by the identity recruited in</p><p>the science classroom (e.g., his or her identity as</p><p>someone who is bad at learning technical matters, as someone who dislikes</p><p>school, or as someone from a family that is not “into” science or school—not</p><p>to mention cases like creationist Christians in biology classes).</p><p>This chapter uses learning to play video games as a crucial example of</p><p>how identities work in learning, an example that illuminates how active and</p><p>critical learning works in any semiotic domain, including in school. Video</p><p>games recruit identities and encourage identity work and reflection on iden-</p><p>tities in clear and powerful ways. If schools worked in similar ways, learning</p><p>in school would be more successful and powerful because it would become</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 51</p><p>52 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>the sorts of active and critical learning discussed in the last chapter. To make</p><p>the discussion concrete, I base it on one particular video game, a fantasy role-</p><p>playing game called Arcanum: Of Steamworks and Magick Obscura.</p><p>I first discuss this game and the sorts of identity work it recruits. Then I</p><p>turn to learning in school, making comparisons and contrasts with learning</p><p>in Arcanum and games like it. Finally, I continue the list of learning principles</p><p>that are embedded in good video games, principles that are important for</p><p>powerful learning in any domain. Let us turn, then, to Arcanum.</p><p>Arcanum takes place in a massive world called Arcanum, a world made up</p><p>of a great many countries and towns. Once upon a time magic (“magick”)</p><p>held sway throughout Arcanum. But now technology has arrived, and Ar-</p><p>canum has become a place of both ancient runes and industrial steamworks, a</p><p>land where magic and machines coexist in a tension-filled and uneasy bal-</p><p>ance. A variety of races—Humans, Elves, Gnomes, Dwarves, Orcs, and</p><p>Ogres, as well as Half-Elves, Half-Orcs, and Half-Ogres (each of which have</p><p>one Human parent)—cohabit this world, each orienting to the conflicts be-</p><p>tween magic and technology in different ways.</p><p>Before you start playing Arcanum, you must construct your character.</p><p>Each race and gender has different natural characteristics. For example, I</p><p>chose to be a female Half-Elf, whom I named “Bead Bead.” Half-Elves, like</p><p>all other races, have their own unique degrees of strength, constitution, dex-</p><p>terity, beauty, intelligence, willpower, perception, and charisma. Each of</p><p>these traits will affect how your character—that is, you—carries out dialogue</p><p>and action in the world of Arcanum and how other characters in the world</p><p>respond to you (e.g., if you are not strong enough to fight in a given situa-</p><p>tion, you better be intelligent enough to think your way out of the problem,</p><p>or beautiful or charismatic enough to get others to want to help you).</p><p>You can also initially choose from a wide variety of unique backgrounds—</p><p>things that happened in your character’s past. For example, your character</p><p>might have been a rich debutante who developed strong social skills in her</p><p>youth suitable now for recruiting help from others or might have been a child</p><p>of a hero, a parent who has given you extra-special skills with a sword, but</p><p>whose reputation for goodness you must now live up to, and so on through</p><p>many other choices.</p><p>When the game starts you get five “points” that you can choose to dis-</p><p>tribute, in any way you wish, to your character, thereby changing his or her</p><p>“natural” state. For example, Bead Bead, as a female Half-Elf, had a natural</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 52</p><p>53v LEARNING AND IDENTITY v</p><p>strength of 7, but I used one of my five points to make her stronger. As the</p><p>game progresses and you gain more worldly experience, you gain yet more</p><p>points to distribute, thereby allowing your character to develop in certain</p><p>ways and not others.</p><p>You can distribute these initial and subsequent points to your character’s</p><p>primary traits, such as strength, dexterity, intelligence, and so forth, but you</p><p>can also use them to build up a wide variety of other skills, such as ability with</p><p>a bow and arrow, skill with picking locks, or persuasive skills; ability to cast a</p><p>wide variety of magic spells or to build a wide variety of technological appara-</p><p>tuses, including weapons; or the ability to heal better or get less fatigued as</p><p>your character engages in effortful tasks. You can choose to have a character</p><p>primarily oriented to magic or technology or some mixture of the two.</p><p>During game play you talk and interact with a great many other charac-</p><p>ters in the world of Arcanum. Your actions gain you a reputation as good or</p><p>evil. Various other characters will join you or not, depending on their own</p><p>alignments as good or evil and also depending on things like your persuasive-</p><p>ness, beauty, and charisma. Throughout the game, you can get gold and buy</p><p>clothing, armor, and equipment for yourself and any of your followers, who</p><p>may run off with your purchases and leave you if you don’t treat please them.</p><p>For example, one of my followers, a rather self-righteous human, kept</p><p>threatening to leave me if I continued to attempt to pick people’s pockets.</p><p>Rather than quit picking pockets (though I did lay off a bit, at least when he</p><p>was looking), I reassured him by giving money to poor street beggars, some-</p><p>thing of which he approved.</p><p>Your adventures in Arcanum start with a catastrophe. Your character is a</p><p>passenger on the Zephyr, a large blimp. Two quite odd flying vessels appear</p><p>and attack the Zephyr, destroying themselves in the process. The Zephyr</p><p>bursts into flame and smashes into the ground. Only your character and a</p><p>dying old man survive the crash. The old man musters just enough strength</p><p>to give you an engraved ring along with a cryptic message. He pleads with</p><p>you to take his ring and bring it to “the boy,” telling you that a great evil is</p><p>coming back to destroy everything. After assuring you that the boy “will</p><p>know what to do,” he dies. You are left as the sole survivor of the crash,</p><p>though you soon meet a mysterious follower of one of Arcanum’s religions, a</p><p>man named Virgil, who, if you wish, will follow and help you.</p><p>Thus, your quest begins. The game involves not only the main quest of</p><p>carrying out the dead man’s wishes, a quest that eventually leads to a great</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 53</p><p>54 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>many sub-quests that are part of the main quest. It also has lots of side quests,</p><p>given to you by characters you meet throughout Arcanum, which you can</p><p>choose to do or ignore. (Though you can gain experience and, thus, more ex-</p><p>perience points to distribute to your character if you do them.) By the time</p><p>you finish, your character is very different from the characters other players</p><p>would have built, and the game you have played is very different from what it</p><p>would have been had you built your character differently initially and</p><p>throughout the game.</p><p>THREE IDENTIT IES:</p><p>VIRTUAL, REAL, AND PROJECTIVE</p><p>A game like Arcanum involves playing with identities in very interesting and</p><p>important ways. When one plays Arcanum, and role-playing games like it,</p><p>three different identities are at stake. All are aspects of the relationship: “A</p><p>real person (here James Paul Gee) as a virtual character (here Bead Bead).”</p><p>They operate all together, at once, as a larger whole.</p><p>First, there is a virtual identity: one’s identity as a virtual character in the</p><p>virtual world of Arcanum—in my case the Half-Elf Bead Bead. I will repre-</p><p>sent this identity as “James Paul Gee as Bead Bead,” where Bead Bead is itali-</p><p>cized to indicate that, in this identity, the stress is on the virtual character</p><p>Bead Bead acting in the virtual world of Arcanum (though I am “playing/de-</p><p>veloping” her).</p><p>In the virtual world of Arcanum, given the sort of creature Bead Bead is</p><p>(a female Half-Elf) and how I have developed her thus far, there are, at any</p><p>point, things she can do and things she cannot do. For example, at a certain</p><p>place in the game, Bead Bead wants to persuade a town meeting to fund the</p><p>building of a monument to please the town’s</p><p>mayor. To do this, she needs to</p><p>be intelligent and persuasive. Half-Elves are, by nature, pretty intelligent,</p><p>and I had built up Bead Bead to be persuasive during the game (i.e., given her</p><p>points in this area). Thus, she was able to pull off the task at the town meet-</p><p>ing (something I very much doubt a Half-Orc could have done, though Half-</p><p>Orcs have other talents). These traits (her intelligence and persuasive skills)</p><p>and her accomplishment at the town meeting—for which she received ample</p><p>praise—are part of my virtual identity as Bead Bead.</p><p>The successes and failures of the virtual being Bead Bead (me in my vir-</p><p>tual identity) are a delicious blend of my doing and not my doing. After all, I</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 54</p><p>55v LEARNING AND IDENTITY v</p><p>made Bead Bead and developed her, so I deserve—partly, at least—praise for</p><p>her successes and blame for her failures. Yet Bead Bead is who she is—a fe-</p><p>male Half-Elf—and must move through the world of Arcanum and be</p><p>formed, in part, by it, a world I did not create. Thus I am, in this sense, not</p><p>responsible for her successes or her failures. I suppose this is how many a par-</p><p>ent feels about his or her child, save that in this case, I (James Paul Gee) am</p><p>my own child (Bead Bead).</p><p>A second identity that is at stake in playing a game like Arcanum is a real-</p><p>world identity: namely, my own identity as “James Paul Gee,” a nonvirtual</p><p>person playing a computer game. I will represent this identity as “James Paul</p><p>Gee as Bead Bead,” where James Paul Gee is italicized to indicate that, in this</p><p>identity, the stress is on the real-world character James Paul Gee playing Ar-</p><p>canum as a game in real time (though Bead Bead is the tool through which I</p><p>operate the game).</p><p>Of course, in the real world I have a good many different nonvirtual</p><p>identities. I am a professor, a linguist, an Anglo American, a middle-age male</p><p>baby boomer, a parent, an avid reader, a middle-class person initially raised</p><p>outside the middle class, a former devout Catholic, a lover of movies, and so</p><p>on through a great many other identities (most of which need not be men-</p><p>tioned here). Of course, these identities become relevant only as they affect</p><p>and are filtered through my identity as a video-game player playing Arcanum.</p><p>And, indeed, any one of my real-world identities can be so engaged whenever</p><p>I am playing Arcanum. Which of these identities, for instance, was at play—</p><p>positively or negatively—when I got such joy at having Bead Bead pick rich</p><p>people’s pockets? When I chose to be a female Half-Elf in the first place?</p><p>When I chose to use my points to make her as strong and good as a male at</p><p>melee fighting with a sword?</p><p>A third identity that is at stake in playing a game like Arcanum is what I</p><p>will call a projective identity, playing on two senses of the word “project,”</p><p>meaning both “to project one’s values and desires onto the virtual character”</p><p>(Bead Bead, in this case) and “seeing the virtual character as one’s own proj-</p><p>ect in the making, a creature whom I imbue with a certain trajectory through</p><p>time defined by my aspirations for what I want that character to be and be-</p><p>come (within the limitations of her capacities, of course).” This is the hardest</p><p>identity to describe but the most important one for understanding the power</p><p>of games like Arcanum. I will represent this identity as “James Paul Gee as</p><p>Bead Bead,” where the word “as” is italicized to indicate that, in this identity,</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 55</p><p>56 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>the stress is on the interface between—the interactions between—the real-</p><p>world person and the virtual character.</p><p>A game like Arcanum allows me, the player, certain degrees of freedom</p><p>(choices) in forming my virtual character and developing her throughout the</p><p>game. In my projective identity I worry about what sort of “person” I want</p><p>her to be, what type of history I want her to have had by the time I am done</p><p>playing the game. I want this person and history to reflect my values, though</p><p>I have to think reflectively and critically about them, since I have never had</p><p>to project a Half-Elf onto the world before. But this person and history also</p><p>reflect what I have learned from playing the game and being Bead Bead in</p><p>the land of Arcanum. A good role-playing video game makes me think new</p><p>thoughts about what I value and what I do not.</p><p>I, the real-world person, James Paul Gee, a creature with multiple identi-</p><p>ties, face the fact that I am fixed in certain ways. Though I am, like all human</p><p>beings, ever changing, at the moment I am who I am (I wish I had more hair,</p><p>but I don’t; I wish I was thinner, but I am not; I wish I was a better game player,</p><p>but I am not). At least for the moment, I must live with my limitations. Bead</p><p>Bead, my virtual alter-ego, is a creature who is, at any moment in the game,</p><p>also fixed in certain ways—she is skilled in certain areas, not others (e.g., while</p><p>she was pretty good at picking pockets, she was lousy at picking locks). At least</p><p>for the given moment in the game, I/she must live with her limitations.</p><p>The kind of person I want Bead Bead to be, the kind of history I want</p><p>her to have, the kind of person and history I am trying to build in and</p><p>through her is what I mean by a projective identity. Since these aspirations</p><p>are my desires for Bead Bead, the projective identity is both mine and hers,</p><p>and it is a space in which I can transcend both her limitations and my own.</p><p>To see more clearly what I mean by a projective identity and how it dif-</p><p>fers from the virtual identity of being Bead Bead and the real-world identity</p><p>of being James Paul Gee (however myriad a thing that is), consider that each</p><p>of the three identities I am talking about can fail (or, for that matter, succeed)</p><p>in different sorts of ways.</p><p>The virtual character Bead Bead (my alter-ego) can fail to defeat another</p><p>character in battle because, as a Half-Elf, at that point in the game, she just is</p><p>not strong enough to win. This is a limitation I have to live with if I want to</p><p>be Bead Bead. Of course, I can mediate on what it feels like—in my role as</p><p>Bead Bead—to be unable to get what I need or want at a certain point be-</p><p>cause I am physically too powerless to get it.</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 56</p><p>57v LEARNING AND IDENTITY v</p><p>The real-world person (James Paul Gee) can fail to use the game controls</p><p>in an effective way, thereby causing Bead Bead to lose a fight against a weaker</p><p>creature she could have otherwise beaten; he can fail to save the game at a</p><p>good time and place (e.g., saving in the middle of a battle that cannot be won</p><p>is a bad move); he can fail to find his (Bead Bead’s) way in a maze because he</p><p>has poor spatial abilities (a trait Bead Bead therefore inherits). He can even re-</p><p>alize that his former Catholic inhibitions will not let Bead Bead take up a</p><p>madam’s offer of a free trip to her (female) brothel. (This is just an example:</p><p>there is such a brothel in Arcanum, but my former Catholic inhibitions, very</p><p>real in the real world, did not, in fact, deny Bead Bead a well-deserved night of</p><p>forbidden pleasure, though, it turns out, she fainted in the middle of things.)</p><p>These are limitations in the real-world me as a game player (an identity</p><p>intersected by a good many other identities), limitations I have to live with if</p><p>I want to play and eventually get better at games. One sort of limitation video</p><p>games certainly bring up to real-world baby boomers like me is that they do</p><p>not reward—in fact, they punish—some of my most cherished ways of learn-</p><p>ing and thinking (e.g., being too quick to want to get to a goal without en-</p><p>gaging in sufficient prior nonlinear exploration).</p><p>The projective identity of Bead Bead as a project (mine) in the making</p><p>can fail because I (the real-world James Paul Gee) have caused Bead Bead</p><p>(the virtual me) to do something in the game that the character I want Bead</p><p>Bead to be would not or should not do. For example, on my first try at the</p><p>game, early on I had Bead Bead sell the ring the old man had given</p><p>social world. However, if you want to do</p><p>physics—for good or ill—it’s best to use the word “work” the way physicists</p><p>do. In that case, they are “right.”</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 2</p><p>3v INTRODUCTION v</p><p>These viewpoints seem obvious to me. They will seem so to some read-</p><p>ers as well. Nonetheless, they occasion great controversy. Furthermore, they</p><p>are not the views about reading and thinking on which most of our schools</p><p>today operate. Take reading, for instance. We know a great deal about the</p><p>psycholinguistics of reading—that is, about reading as a mental act taking</p><p>part in an individual’s head. These views strongly inform how reading is</p><p>taught in school. And there is nothing wrong with this, save that psycholin-</p><p>guistics is only part—in my view the smaller part—of the reading picture. We</p><p>know much less about reading as a social achievement and as part and parcel</p><p>of a great many different social practices connected to a great many different</p><p>social groups that contest how things should be read and thought about.</p><p>The same is true of thinking. Cognitive science has taught us a great deal</p><p>about thinking as a mental act taking part in an individual’s head. For various</p><p>reasons, however, these views less strongly inform how teaching and learning</p><p>work in today’s schools than they used to. This is so, in part, because the</p><p>views about thinking current in cognitive science stress the importance of ac-</p><p>tive inquiry and deep conceptual understanding, things that are not politi-</p><p>cally popular any longer in schools, driven as they are today by standardized</p><p>tests and skill-and-drill curricula devoted to “the basics.”</p><p>Nonetheless, it is true that we know much less about thinking as a social</p><p>achievement and as part and parcel of a great many different social practices</p><p>connected to a great many different social groups that contest how things</p><p>should be read and thought about. For example, it turns out that botanists</p><p>and landscape architects classify and think about trees quite differently. Their</p><p>different contexts, social practices, and purposes shape their thinking (and</p><p>reading) in different ways. Neither way is “right” or “wrong” in general. We</p><p>know little about how social groups, social practices, and institutions shape</p><p>and norm thinking as a social achievement, that is, about how they shape</p><p>human minds when those minds are being botanists or landscape architects,</p><p>though not when these same people are being other things.</p><p>And this last point is crucial. Since reading and thinking are social</p><p>achievements connected to social groups, we can all read and think in differ-</p><p>ent ways when we read and think as members (or as if we are members) of dif-</p><p>ferent groups. I, for one, know well what it is like to read the Bible differently</p><p>as theology, as literature, and as a religious skeptic, thanks to different experi-</p><p>ences and affiliations in my life thus far. Any specific way of reading and think-</p><p>ing is, in fact, a way of being in the world, a way of being a certain “kind of</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 3</p><p>4 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>person,” a way of taking on a certain sort of identity. In that sense, each of us</p><p>has multiple identities. Even a priest can read the Bible “as a priest,” “as a lit-</p><p>erary critic,” “as a historian,” even “as a male” or “ as an African American”</p><p>(priest, literary critic, historian, or ethnic group member), even if he chooses</p><p>to privilege one way of reading—one identity—over another.</p><p>This does not mean we all have multiple personality disorder. We each</p><p>have a core identity that relates to all our other identities (as a woman, femi-</p><p>nist, wife, ethnic of a certain sort, biologist, Catholic, etc.). We have this core</p><p>identity thanks to being in one and the same body over time and thanks to</p><p>being able to tell ourselves a reasonably (but only reasonably) coherent life</p><p>story in which we are the “hero” (or, at least, central character). But as we</p><p>take on new identities or transform old ones, this core identity changes and</p><p>transforms as well. We are fluid creatures in the making, since we make our-</p><p>selves socially through participation with others in various groups. Social</p><p>practices and social groups are always changing, some slowly, some at a faster</p><p>pace (and the pace of change, for many social practices and groups, gets faster</p><p>and faster in our contemporary high-tech global world).</p><p>Although the viewpoints I have sketched above may (or may not) seem</p><p>obvious, they have taken me a lot of time to work on and, in the act, I have</p><p>become if not “old,” then “older,” what we might call a late-middle-age</p><p>“baby boomer.” I was born in 1948. So, for heaven’s sake, what I am doing</p><p>playing video games and, worse yet, writing about it? The short answer, but</p><p>not really the whole answer, since I came to this desire after playing the</p><p>games, was that I wanted to say about learning just what I have said above</p><p>about reading and thinking.</p><p>The longer answer is this: When my six-year-old was four, I used to sit</p><p>next to him as he played video games, starting with Winnie the Pooh and mov-</p><p>ing on to Freddy Fish, Pajama Sam, and Spy Fox. I was intrigued. One day I</p><p>decided I wanted to help my child play Pajama Sam in No Need to Hide When</p><p>It’s Dark Outside. This is a game where the player (as the comic book super-</p><p>hero “Pajama Sam”—a character who is “just” the small boy Sam pretending</p><p>to be a superhero in order to increase his courage) must solve problems in the</p><p>“Land of Darkness” to meet “Darkness” and tame him, so that the player</p><p>(Sam) need no longer be afraid of the dark. A typical problem in the game is</p><p>deciding how to convince a talking wooden boat that wood floats, so that the</p><p>boat, which is afraid of water, can feel free to go “boating” on the water and</p><p>take Pajama Sam where he needs to go. I decided to play through the game</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 4</p><p>5v INTRODUCTION v</p><p>by myself so I could “coach” my child as he played. (Now he charges me a</p><p>dollar any time I attempt to “coach” him when he is playing a video game—</p><p>he calls it “bossing him around” and “telling him what to do when he can fig-</p><p>ure it out for himself.”)</p><p>When I played the game I was quite surprised to find out it was fairly</p><p>long and pretty challenging, even for an adult. Yet a four-year-old was willing</p><p>to put in this time and face this challenge—and enjoy it, to boot. I thought, as</p><p>someone who has worked in the second half of his career in education (the</p><p>first half was devoted to theoretical linguistics), “Wouldn’t it be great if kids</p><p>were willing to put in this much time on task on such challenging material in</p><p>school and enjoy it so much?”</p><p>So I decided to buy and play an adult game (“adult” here means the game</p><p>is played by teenagers on up; video-game players tend to be anywhere be-</p><p>tween 3 years old and 39). I somewhat arbitrarily picked the game The New</p><p>Adventures of the Time Machine, a game involving adventure, problem solving,</p><p>and shooting (based loosely on H. G. Wells), knowing nearly nothing about</p><p>video games. Little did I know what I was getting myself into. This game,</p><p>like nearly all such games, takes a great many hours to play. Many good video</p><p>games can take 50 to 100 hours to win, even for good players. Furthermore,</p><p>it was—for me—profoundly difficult.</p><p>In fact, this was my first revelation. This game—and this turned out to</p><p>be true of video games more generally—requires the player to learn and</p><p>think in ways in which I am not adept. Suddenly all my baby-boomer ways of</p><p>learning and thinking, for which I had heretofore received ample rewards,</p><p>did not work.</p><p>My second realization came soon after, when at the end of a day in which</p><p>I had played Time Machine for eight straight hours, I found myself at a party,</p><p>with a splitting headache from too much video motion, sitting next to a 300-</p><p>pound plasma physicist. I heard myself telling the physicist that I found play-</p><p>ing Time Machine a “life-enhancing experience,” without even knowing what</p><p>I meant by that. Fortunately, plasma physicists are extremely tolerant</p><p>her. This</p><p>is not a mistake at playing the game (thus not a failure of the real me to play</p><p>the game properly). It’s a move allowed by the internal design grammar of</p><p>the game and one for which I would have suffered no bad consequences in</p><p>the game world. It is also not something that Half-Elves can’t do or are, for</p><p>that matter, necessarily too principled or ungreedy to want to do. Thus it is</p><p>not necessarily a violation of Bead Bead as a virtual identity.</p><p>However, the act just seemed wrong for the creature I wanted Bead Bead</p><p>to be (or to have become, however partially, by the end of the game). I felt</p><p>when I (Bead Bead) had sold the ring that I was forming a history for Bead</p><p>Bead that was not the one she should have. I wanted her to be a creature who</p><p>acted more intelligently and more cautiously, a creature who could eventually</p><p>look back on the history of her acts without regret. I felt I had “let her down”</p><p>and started the game all over again. Thus, in my projective identity—Bead</p><p>Bead as my project—I am attributing feelings and motives to Bead Bead that</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 57</p><p>58 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>go beyond the confines of the game world and enter the realm of a world of</p><p>my own creation.</p><p>It is not uncommon, even when young people are playing first-person</p><p>shooter games featuring a superhuman hero (like Master Chief in Halo, a</p><p>game for the Xbox)—a character that, unlike Bead Bead, they usually cannot</p><p>choose or develop but must take as is—that they will redo a given fight scene</p><p>because they feel they have “let their character down.” They want to pull off</p><p>the victory more spectacularly as befits a superhero. They feel responsible to</p><p>and for the character. They are projecting an identity as to who the character</p><p>ought to be and what the trajectory of his or her acts in the virtual world</p><p>ought, at the end of the day, to look like.</p><p>Likewise, while some young people will let a superhero first-person</p><p>shooter character kill “civilians” and not just enemies, a good many others</p><p>will not, since they feel that it just isn’t fitting for such a superperson—that is,</p><p>the person they are projecting into the world—to do such a thing. In fact, I</p><p>once had remorse when I let/made Bead Bead kill a pesky chicken, an action</p><p>for which she was also suitably castigated by the self-righteous follower I</p><p>mentioned earlier. Players are projecting an identity onto their virtual char-</p><p>acter based both on their own values and on what the game has taught them</p><p>about what such a character should or might be and become.</p><p>This tripartite play of identities (a virtual identity, a real-world identity,</p><p>and a projective identity) in the relationship “player as virtual character” is</p><p>quite powerful. It transcends identification with characters in novels or</p><p>movies, for instance, because it is both active (the player actively does things)</p><p>and reflexive, in the sense that once the player has made some choices about</p><p>the virtual character, the virtual character is now developed in a way that sets</p><p>certain parameters about what the player can do. The virtual character re-</p><p>dounds back on the player and affects his or her future actions.</p><p>As a player, I was proud of Bead Bead at the end of the game in a way in</p><p>which I have never been proud of a character in a novel or movie, however</p><p>much I had identified with him or her. I can identify with the pride characters</p><p>in a novel or movie must or should feel, given what they have done or how</p><p>far they have come. But my satisfaction with Bead Bead is tinged with pride</p><p>(or, it could have been regret had things turned out differently), at various</p><p>levels, in and with myself. This feeling is not (just) selfish. In a sense, it is also</p><p>selfless, since it is pride at things that have transcended—taken me outside</p><p>of—my real-world self (selves), if I am playing the game reflectively.</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 58</p><p>59v LEARNING AND IDENTITY v</p><p>IDENTITY AND LEARNING</p><p>The theme of this book is that good video games reflect, in their design,</p><p>good principles of learning. We turn directly to some of these principles in</p><p>the next section and in following chapters. Now I want to discuss how and</p><p>why the sort of play with identities at work in Arcanum is relevant to learning</p><p>outside video games.</p><p>A game like Arcanum is powerfully caught up with playing with identi-</p><p>ties. However, all deep learning—that is, active, critical learning—is inextri-</p><p>cably caught up with identity in a variety of different ways. People cannot</p><p>learn in a deep way within a semiotic domain if they are not willing to com-</p><p>mit themselves fully to the learning in terms of time, effort, and active en-</p><p>gagement. Such a commitment requires that they are willing to see</p><p>themselves in terms of a new identity, that is, to see themselves as the kind of</p><p>person who can learn, use, and value the new semiotic domain. In turn, they</p><p>need to believe that, if they are successful learners in the domain, they will be</p><p>valued and accepted by others committed to that domain—that is, by people</p><p>in the affinity group associated with the domain.</p><p>It has been argued that some poor urban African-American children and</p><p>teenagers resist learning literacy in school because they see school-based lit-</p><p>eracy as “white,” as associated with people who disregard them and others</p><p>like them. They don’t believe that a society that they view as racist will ever</p><p>allow them to gain a good job, status, and power, even if they do succeed at</p><p>school-based literacy. Thus they will not envisage themselves in the new</p><p>identity that success in school-based literacy requires—that is, as the “kind of</p><p>person” who learns, values, and uses such literacy and gets valued and re-</p><p>spected for doing so. Without such an identity commitment, no deep learn-</p><p>ing can occur. The students will not invest the time, effort, and personally</p><p>committed engagement that active, critical learning requires. In fact, they re-</p><p>sist learning in school in the name of another identity that they see such</p><p>learning as putting at risk.</p><p>The tripartite play of identities that a game like Arcanum recruits is at</p><p>the root of active and critical learning in many other semiotic domains, in-</p><p>cluding learning content actively and critically in school. Let’s take good</p><p>school science learning as an example.</p><p>First, let’s consider virtual identities. In a good science classroom, a virtual</p><p>identity is at stake. Learners need to be able to engage in words, interactions,</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 59</p><p>60 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>and actions that allow them to take on the identity of a “scientist.” But what</p><p>does this mean? There are many different sciences and types of scientists. The</p><p>teacher must put into motion, in his or her classroom, a set of values, beliefs,</p><p>and ways with words, deeds, and interactions that represent, for the teacher</p><p>and the students, what it means to be a particular kind of scientist in this class-</p><p>room. Doing this means taking up a specific viewpoint on a specific branch of</p><p>science as a set of cognitive and social practices. Of course, the students are</p><p>not “real” scientists and are not going to become real scientists any time soon.</p><p>What is being created here is a virtual identity (“student as scientist”).</p><p>As I did with Bead Bead in Arcanum, learners in a science classroom should</p><p>see the virtual identity (being a particular type of scientist) as partly fixed by the</p><p>history and workings of the (scientific) semiotic domain being learned and</p><p>partly open to some choices (compatible, of course, with the domain) that they</p><p>themselves get to make about this virtual identity. For example, in one fourth-</p><p>grade classroom in which I have worked, the children did experiments on fast-</p><p>growing plants, mentored, in part, by the scientist who actually invented such</p><p>plants (a man with strong views about how scientists ought to think, value, and</p><p>act) as well as by their teacher (a teacher with strong views about how she wants</p><p>her students to think, value, and act when they are learning</p><p>science). In this</p><p>classroom, the children were expected to act, interact, and use language in ways</p><p>that were recognizable, in terms of the norms set up in this classroom, as scien-</p><p>tists doing science. However, the children could also choose a particular style</p><p>of carrying out their virtual identities as scientists.</p><p>For example, the children chose what questions they wanted to ask and</p><p>what sort of experiments they wanted to carry out to help answer those ques-</p><p>tions. Some worked in closer collaborations with other children than others</p><p>did. Some studied texts more thoroughly before experimentation, some more</p><p>thoroughly afterward. Some experimented to check on the results of previous</p><p>experiments they found suspicious; others chose to try something for the first</p><p>time. Some used African American Vernacular English phonology, some did</p><p>not, though they all used the lexicon and syntax of scientific language about</p><p>plants when they needed to, which was an important norm in the classroom.</p><p>Second, let’s consider real-world identities. In good science classrooms,</p><p>the learners’ real-world identities are involved (“learner as scientist”). All</p><p>learners in a science classroom bring to that room their real-world identities.</p><p>As was the case with me playing Arcanum, each learner has multiple real-</p><p>world identities: A given child might be middle-class, male, African Ameri-</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 60</p><p>61v LEARNING AND IDENTITY v</p><p>can, a Pokemon fanatic, adept at rap music, and have a good many other</p><p>identities as well. But, too, like me playing Arcanum, where these multiple</p><p>identities are all filtered through my identity as a game player, the multiple</p><p>real-world identities of learners in a science classroom are filtered through</p><p>their real-world identities as a learner, a school learner, and a school science</p><p>learner learning science here and now.</p><p>If a child brings to science learning a real-world identity as a learner, a</p><p>school learner, or a school science learner who is already damaged—and a</p><p>good many children do—then this identity needs to be repaired before any</p><p>active, critical learning can occur here and now. Imagine how successful you</p><p>would be learning to play Arcanum if you started with the assumption that</p><p>you are a failure at learning to play video games and role-playing games in</p><p>particular. This, in fact, is what has happened to me when I tried to learn</p><p>real-time strategy games (e.g., Age of Empires, Star Wars: Galactic Battle-</p><p>grounds, or WarCraft III). I am intimated by anything that is a race against</p><p>time, and so, thus far, I have been a failure at playing real-time strategy</p><p>games well and with enjoyment. Some repair work needs to be done.</p><p>Furthermore, if children cannot or will not make bridges between one or</p><p>more of their real-world identities and the virtual identity at stake in the</p><p>classroom (here, a particular type of scientist)—or if teachers or others de-</p><p>stroy or don’t help build such bridges—then, once again, learning is imper-</p><p>iled. Children who, for instance, see themselves as members of families that</p><p>are adept at technical learning have an advantage, since they can build a pow-</p><p>erful bridge between one of their real-world identities (“people like us learn</p><p>technical stuff well—it’s no big deal”) and the virtual identity at stake in the</p><p>science classroom (“scientists in the sort of semiotic domain being created in</p><p>this classroom do not fear or put off technical learning”). If a child cannot or</p><p>will not build such bridges, then, again, repair works needs to be done.</p><p>But how can such repair work be done? It is no easy matter. In fact, often</p><p>this is what good teaching, especially in socially and culturally diverse class-</p><p>rooms, amounts to. However, good repair work is just a more intense version</p><p>of good teaching and learning for all types of students, including those who</p><p>have no need of any particular repair work.</p><p>Such teaching and learning is, in my view, a matter of three things:</p><p>1. The learner must be enticed to try, even if he or she already has good</p><p>grounds to be afraid to try.</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 61</p><p>62 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>2. The learner must be enticed to put in lots of effort even if he or she be-</p><p>gins with little motivation to do so.</p><p>3. The learner must achieve some meaningful success when he or she has</p><p>expended this effort.</p><p>There are three principles here because people will not put in effort if they</p><p>are not even willing to try in a domain; success without effort is not reward-</p><p>ing; and effort with little success is equally unrewarding.</p><p>These three things seem pretty basic. Nonetheless, they are left out of</p><p>most of the current debates about education, which tend not to engage with</p><p>issues about the identities learners bring to school and how these identities</p><p>relate to motivation and effort (or their lack) in relation to specific sorts of</p><p>pedagogies.</p><p>Video games are particularly good at these three things, at least for some</p><p>types of learners. For instance, when I started playing video games, I cer-</p><p>tainly brought a fearful and damaged identity as a game player to the task. I</p><p>had never been good at such things in the past, and my identical twin brother</p><p>always beat me when we played the early video games. And I felt too old now</p><p>to have any success. Furthermore, initially I could not conceive of which of</p><p>my multiple real-world identities could possibly serve as bridge to the sorts</p><p>of virtual worlds and identities video games set up (e.g., blasting Aliens—I’ve</p><p>always liked Aliens).</p><p>What enticed me to try in the first place, then? Well, I watched my son</p><p>play video games, starting with Winnie the Pooh, moving on to Pajama Sam,</p><p>Freddy Fish, Putt-Putt, and Spy Fox. I played some of the games myself (“just</p><p>to help him”). I tried a more adult game, one I picked “randomly” at the</p><p>store, the little-known game The New Adventures of the Time Machine. Of</p><p>course, its tie to literature (H. G. Wells’s book The Time Machine) piqued my</p><p>interest and made playing a video game seem more acceptable, in terms of</p><p>some of my real-world identities. My engagement with games through my</p><p>child taught me there was some level at which I could enter this semiotic do-</p><p>main in which I could achieve enough initial success to keep on practicing</p><p>and getting better. To repair damaged learners in any domain, there must be</p><p>some such story, though the stories will be as various as the learners.</p><p>Even more important, I learned that video games create what the psychol-</p><p>ogist Eric Erickson has called a psychosocial moratorium—that is, a learning space</p><p>in which the learner can take risks where real-world consequences are lowered.</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 62</p><p>63v LEARNING AND IDENTITY v</p><p>After all, you can save the game and start back at the save point when you fail.</p><p>Often you can customize the game to a level of difficulty you can cope with ini-</p><p>tially. And, of course, you can choose the game you want to play. Although you</p><p>have to put out a good deal of effort to play any good video game, there is a rel-</p><p>atively low cost of failure and high reward for success. None of this is to say</p><p>that it does not bother or even frustrate players when they die or do not play</p><p>part of a game well. It does indeed. Of course they care about how well they</p><p>do—but the cost of caring is not prohibitive, as it so often is in school.</p><p>What made me, once I was enticed to try, willing to put in lots of effort</p><p>and practice with video games? When you have chosen a video game well,</p><p>the virtual world it allows you to live in is quite compelling. I found the vir-</p><p>tual world of The New Adventures of the Time Machine simply amazing. I par-</p><p>ticularly liked how, when a certain wave of light went through the world, all</p><p>adult characters in the game changed to their child selves and all children</p><p>changed to their adult selves, so that sometimes the virtual character you are</p><p>playing, Brendan Wales, is a boy, sometimes a man. What makes a game</p><p>compelling to me might not make it so to you. Indeed, what</p><p>made a game</p><p>compelling to me when I started to play is not what makes a game com-</p><p>pelling to me now. But if the virtual world and virtual identity at stake in</p><p>learning is not compelling to the learner, at some level, then little deep learn-</p><p>ing is liable to occur, in part because the learner is going to be unwilling to</p><p>put in the effort and practice demanded for mastering the domain.</p><p>What made The New Adventures of the Time Machine compelling to me</p><p>was initially the way in which I could bridge some of my real-world identities</p><p>to the virtual character I played in the game and the virtual world in which</p><p>he/I moved. For example, there were the ties to literature (books); academics</p><p>(Wales is a scientist); problem solving (another tie, at least initially, to my ac-</p><p>ademic identity); a medieval but futuristic world (I once lived for real in the</p><p>medieval world, though we don’t need to pursue the matter further here);</p><p>and fantasy worlds (I have always been a willing escapee from reality, which is</p><p>why I have always loved movies and have nothing against Ivory Towers).</p><p>Once these ties had drawn me into the game and made me put in lots of ef-</p><p>fort, it would have been disappointing in the extreme to experience no success.</p><p>However, it would have been equally disappointing to get the sorts of rewards</p><p>that much better players get. This would have made me believe the domain</p><p>was not very deep and rich. So how does one build in success for effort, success</p><p>that is earned, not given away, but nonetheless ensured, given the effort?</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 63</p><p>64 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>Good computer games are designed so that they adjust to different levels</p><p>of play and reward each sort of player, if the player is putting in effort, with</p><p>some appropriate degree of success. For example, in a shooter game, after</p><p>much exploration, I may uncover a spiffy rifle that I am just thrilled with,</p><p>since it is so much better than the crowbar I have been using to fend off ene-</p><p>mies, while you, much better at the game than I, may have found a tank.</p><p>Of course, video games offer players a feeling of achievement in a num-</p><p>ber of different ways. First of all, they operate according to a very powerful</p><p>learning principle, a principle we can call the “amplification of input princi-</p><p>ple.” When systems operate according to this principle, they give, for a little</p><p>input, a lot of output. (Driving a car is a good example: You press a little</p><p>pedal and off you zoom.) In a video game, you press some buttons in the real</p><p>world and a whole interactive virtual world comes to life. Amplification of</p><p>input is highly motivating for learning.</p><p>By the way, in the real world, science often operates by the amplification</p><p>of input principle. In a chemistry experiment, you mix a few chemicals and</p><p>make a major discovery, cure cancer, or blow up the lab. Think, too, of the</p><p>monk Mendel and his peas: He putters (in the right way) in the garden and</p><p>unlocks the key to the origins and development of species on earth. Think</p><p>even of Newton’s laws of motion: Such simple and elegant principles cover so</p><p>much ground and give so much insight into so many things that one is simply</p><p>amazed. None of this is to say that great effort is not required. Mendel</p><p>worked for years (and, by the way, failed his exam to become a high school</p><p>biology teacher, which was why he was stuck in the garden). It is just to say</p><p>that there is something very satisfying when what one actually does seems so</p><p>small compared to what one gets. It’s like a miracle.</p><p>Video games also offer other rewards than the powerfully amplified</p><p>outputs they give. When I was enticed to put in effort on The New Adven-</p><p>tures of the Time Machine, new compelling elements quickly arose, beyond</p><p>those connected to my real-world identities and the amplification of input</p><p>I experienced. I discovered that this game, like many other good video</p><p>games, encourages new ways of learning and thinking for an old baby</p><p>boomer like me. I discovered new powers in myself. I felt the dawning of a</p><p>new identity growing, one to be added to my other real-world identities.</p><p>Of course this is true of all good learning—we gain a new valued identity</p><p>that gives us new powers; it’s the final hook where the repair work is fi-</p><p>nally done.</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 64</p><p>65v LEARNING AND IDENTITY v</p><p>This discussion suggests that good science instruction—or good instruc-</p><p>tion in any content area—must accomplish the same three goals. The learner</p><p>must be enticed to try. This is done through building bridges to his or her</p><p>real-world identities and by creating a psychosocial moratorium.</p><p>The learner must be enticed to put in lots of effort. This is done by mak-</p><p>ing the virtual world and virtual identity (e.g., being/doing a particular type</p><p>of scientists in the classroom) at stake in the learning compelling to the</p><p>learner on his or her own terms. The learner needs to be sucked in.</p><p>And, finally, this effort must issue in success at an appropriate level, cus-</p><p>tomized to the learner’s stage of development in the semiotic domain being</p><p>learned. Success for effort at different levels needs to be built in, letting</p><p>learners know all the while that there will be yet greater successes for yet</p><p>greater effort. Amplification of input needs to be designed into the teaching</p><p>and learning. And to ensure the deepest sort of success, the virtual world</p><p>needs to be built in such a way that learners discover new powers and feel the</p><p>dawning of new valued identities.</p><p>Let us turn to projective identities (“the learner as scientist”). If learners are</p><p>to take on projective identities in the science classroom, they must come to</p><p>project their own values and desires onto the virtual identity of “being a sci-</p><p>entist of a certain sort” in this classroom. They also must come to see this</p><p>virtual identity as their own project in the making, an identity they take on</p><p>that entails a certain trajectory through time defined by their own values, de-</p><p>sires, choices, goals, and actions. This is what creates ownership.</p><p>When learners take on a projective identity, they want the scientist they</p><p>are “playing” to be a certain sort of person and to have had a certain sort of</p><p>history in the learning trajectory of this classroom. They have aspirations for</p><p>this scientist, just as I had aspirations for Bead Bead when I played Arcanum.</p><p>Perhaps they want their scientist to have had a history of having been persist-</p><p>ent, resilient in the face of failure, collaborative, risk taking, skeptical, and</p><p>creative. They want their scientist to become this sort of person, whether or</p><p>not they are themselves anything like this in their “everyday” lives. In good</p><p>science learning, learners are not just role-playing being a scientist of a cer-</p><p>tain sort (their virtual identity). They are also proactively building that vir-</p><p>tual person as a certain kind of person with a certain kind of history. They are</p><p>projecting their own hopes and desires onto that person.</p><p>The learner’s hopes, values, and aspirations for the “character” (the vir-</p><p>tual scientist)—and the project the learner makes of that character, the history</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 65</p><p>66 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>he or she builds for that character—have their source not just in the learner’s</p><p>real-world identities, though they most certainly partially have their source</p><p>there as the learner reflects on his or her values, desires, aspirations, and goals.</p><p>They also have their source in what the learner is learning about the virtual</p><p>identity and the virtual world (what it means to be a scientist in this class-</p><p>room). Remember that the projective identity is the interface between one’s</p><p>real-world identities and the virtual identity (e.g., between the real me and the</p><p>virtual Bead Bead). The projective identity is the space in which the learner</p><p>can transcend the limitations both of the virtual identity and the learner’s own</p><p>real-world identity.</p><p>If learners in classrooms carry learning so far as to take on a projective</p><p>identity, something magic happens—a magic that cannot take place in quite</p><p>the same way when playing a video game. The learner comes to know that he</p><p>or she has the capacity, at some level, to take on the virtual identity as a real</p><p>world identity. However much I might want to do, I myself, in the real world,</p><p>have no capacity to become the sort of female Half-Elf I wanted and built</p><p>Bead Bead to be (though I can still adopt some of her persona). But learners</p><p>in a good science classroom come to feel what it is like to have the capacity to</p><p>be the sort of scientist (and person) they have wanted and built their “charac-</p><p>ter” in the classroom to be.</p><p>Learners do not, of course, have to realize this capacity in actuality and</p><p>become scientists. They don’t even have to feel they could become particu-</p><p>larly good scientists—after all, in the projective identity you also learn about</p><p>your own limitations. Often it is enough that they have sensed new powers in</p><p>themselves. They will, possibly for a lifetime, be able to empathize with, affil-</p><p>iate with, learn more about, and even critique science as a valued but vulner-</p><p>able human enterprise.</p><p>This is why it is important for teachers to pick the semiotic domains they</p><p>will teach—and the particular virtual identities and worlds they will create in</p><p>their classrooms—carefully. If children are learning deeply, they will learn,</p><p>through their projective identities, new values and new ways of being in the</p><p>world based on the powerful juxtaposition of their real-world identities (“So,</p><p>that’s what I really feel, think, and value”) and the virtual identity at stake in</p><p>the learning (“So, these are the ways of feeling, thinking, and valuing open to</p><p>a scientist”). This juxtaposition is the ground on which their projective work</p><p>has been done. (“So, I want, for this time and place, to have been this type of</p><p>scientist and person and not that type.”)</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 66</p><p>67v LEARNING AND IDENTITY v</p><p>LEARNING PRINCIPLES</p><p>The discussion has suggested more learning principles that are built into</p><p>good video games. In this section, I bring these together to continue the list</p><p>started in chapter 2. After listing principles we have already discussed, I dis-</p><p>cuss a few others that are related to them:</p><p>6. “Psychosocial Moratorium” Principle</p><p>Learners can take risks in a space where real-world consequences are</p><p>lowered.</p><p>7. Committed Learning Principle</p><p>Learners participate in an extended engagement (lots of effort and</p><p>practice) as extensions of their real-world identities in relation to a</p><p>virtual identity to which they feel some commitment and a virtual</p><p>world that they find compelling.</p><p>8. Identity Principle</p><p>Learning involves taking on and playing with identities in such a way</p><p>that the learner has real choices (in developing the virtual identity)</p><p>and ample opportunity to meditate on the relationship between new</p><p>identities and old ones. There is a tripartite play of identities as learn-</p><p>ers relate, and reflect on, their multiple real-world identities, a virtual</p><p>identity, and a projective identity.</p><p>9. Self-Knowledge Principle</p><p>The virtual world is constructed in such a way that learners learn not</p><p>only about the domain but about themselves and their current and</p><p>potential capacities.</p><p>10. Amplification of Input Principle</p><p>For a little input, learners get a lot of output.</p><p>11. Achievement Principle</p><p>For learners of all levels of skill there are intrinsic rewards from the</p><p>beginning, customized to each learner’s level, effort, and growing</p><p>mastery and signaling the learner’s ongoing achievements.</p><p>Because good video games are built in such a way that they operate by</p><p>these learning principles, several other principles also come into play. One</p><p>thing that designers of video games realize, but that many schools seem</p><p>not to, is that learning for human beings is, in large part, a practice effect.</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 67</p><p>68 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>Humans need to practice what they are learning a good deal before they</p><p>master it. Furthermore, they tend to lose a good deal of their learning—</p><p>including school learning—when they cease to practice the skills associ-</p><p>ated with this learning in their daily lives. This is why it is easy to discover</p><p>many adults who are no longer very good with school-based science, math,</p><p>or literacy if they do not, in their work or home lives, practice these on a</p><p>regular basis.</p><p>The fact that human learning is a practice effect can create a good deal of</p><p>difficulty for learning in school. Children cannot learn in a deep way if they</p><p>have no opportunities to practice what they are learning. They cannot learn</p><p>deeply only by being told things outside the context of embodied actions. Yet</p><p>at the same time, children must be motivated to engage in a good deal of</p><p>practice if they are to master what is to be learned. However, if this practice is</p><p>boring, they will resist it.</p><p>Good video games involve the player in a compelling world of action and</p><p>interaction, a world to which the learner has made an identity commitment,</p><p>in the sense of engaging in the sort of play with identities we have discussed.</p><p>Thanks to this fact, the player practices a myriad of skills, over and over</p><p>again, relevant to playing the game, often without realizing that he or she is</p><p>engaging in such extended practice sessions. For example, the six-year-old we</p><p>discussed in the last chapter has grouped and regrouped his Pikmin a thou-</p><p>sand times. And I have practiced, in the midst of battle, switching Bead Bead</p><p>to a magic spell and away from her sword in a timely fashion a good many</p><p>times. The player’s sights are set on his or her aspirations and goals in the vir-</p><p>tual world of the game, not on the level of practicing skills outside meaning-</p><p>ful, goal-driven contexts.</p><p>Educators often bemoan the fact that video games are compelling and</p><p>school is not. They say that children must learn to practice skills (“skill and</p><p>drill”) outside of meaningful contexts and outside their own goals: It’s too</p><p>bad, but that’s just the way school and, indeed, life is, they claim. Unfortu-</p><p>nately, if human learning works best in a certain way, given the sorts of bio-</p><p>logical creatures we are, then it is not going to work well in another way just</p><p>because educators, policymakers, and politicians want it to.</p><p>The fact is that there are some children who learn well in skill-and-drill</p><p>contexts. However, in my experience, these children do find this sort of in-</p><p>struction meaningful and compelling, usually because they trust that it will</p><p>lead them to accomplish their goals and have success later in life. In turn,</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 68</p><p>69v LEARNING AND IDENTITY v</p><p>they believe this thanks to their trust in various authority figures around</p><p>them (family and teachers) who have told them this. Other children have no</p><p>such trust. Nor do I.</p><p>In any case, I have already made my own position clear: Passive learning—</p><p>rather than active, critical learning—will not lead to much power and empow-</p><p>erment in the contemporary world, however much it may suit one for a</p><p>low-level service job. Mastering literacy or math as a set of routinized proce-</p><p>dures without being able to use these procedures proactively within activities</p><p>that one understands and for the accomplishment of one’s own goals will not</p><p>lead to learners who can learn quickly and well as they face new semiotic do-</p><p>mains, as they will throughout their lives.</p><p>Learning how to operate the controls of a computer game outside any</p><p>understanding of the meaningful activities the controls are used to accom-</p><p>plish in the virtual world of the game and outside one’s own goals in that</p><p>world leads, in a shooter game or a realistic military game, for example, to a</p><p>quick demise (and, thus, not all that much practice, save at dying again and</p><p>again). In my view, the same is true—metaphorically speaking—in school.</p><p>The achievement principle above (Principle 11) tells us that good</p><p>video games reward all players who put in effort but reward players at dif-</p><p>ferent</p><p>skill levels differently. But there is more to this matter: Good video</p><p>games give players better and deeper rewards as (and if) they continue to</p><p>learn new things as they play (or replay) the game. This means that, in a</p><p>good video game, the distinction between learner and master is vague (at</p><p>whatever level of mastery one thinks one has arrived). If players have just</p><p>routinized their behaviors (i.e., if they operate on “automatic pilot” and</p><p>keep reacting to problems in the same now well-practiced way), a level of</p><p>the game will be reached at which the game will realize this and disreward</p><p>these behaviors. This fact forces players to think about the routinized</p><p>mastery they have achieved and to undo this routinization to achieve a</p><p>new and higher level of skill. This higher level of skill will itself, thanks to</p><p>the large amount of practice that video games allow, become routinized</p><p>(automatic) as the player perfects it, only to be undone later in the game,</p><p>or in the same game played a second time at a higher level of difficulty, or</p><p>in a new game.</p><p>Several educators have argued that this cycle of automatization of skills</p><p>through practice, rethinking this automatization when faced with new condi-</p><p>tions in order to learn new skills and transform old ones, and then perfecting</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 69</p><p>70 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>these new skills through further practice that once again leads to automatiza-</p><p>tion is the very foundation of intelligent practice in the world. Automatization</p><p>is good and necessary if one is to engage in fluent and masterful practice.</p><p>However, it gets in the way of new learning if it does not change and adapt in</p><p>the face of novel conditions and new opportunities to learn, which requires</p><p>the learner to bring back to conscious awareness skills that have become un-</p><p>conscious and taken for granted and to think anew about these skills and how</p><p>they relate to specific sorts of problems. A cycle of automatization, adaptation,</p><p>new learning, and new automatization is a sine qua non of learning for those</p><p>who want to survive as active thinkers and actors in a fast changing world that</p><p>requires the mastery of ever newer semiotic domains. Video games are quite</p><p>adept at creating and sustaining this cycle.</p><p>Finally, all the design features discussed so far work to ensure that a good</p><p>video game operates within the learner’s “regime of competence.” By this I</p><p>mean that the game often operates within, but at the outer edge of, the</p><p>learner’s resources, so that at many points the game is felt as challenging but</p><p>not “undoable.” If learning always operates well within the learner’s re-</p><p>sources, then all that happens is that the learner’s behaviors get more and</p><p>more routinized, as the learner continues to experience success by doing the</p><p>same things. This is good, as we have seen, for learning and practicing fluent</p><p>and masterful performance (which is, indeed, necessary), but it is not good</p><p>for developing newer and higher skills. However, if learning operates outside</p><p>one’s resources, the learner is simply frustrated and gives up.</p><p>While good video games offer players ample opportunity to practice and</p><p>even automatize their skills at various levels, they also always build in many</p><p>opportunities for learners to operate at the outer edge of their regime of</p><p>competence, thereby causing them to rethink their routinized mastery and</p><p>move, within the game and within themselves, to a new level. Indeed, for</p><p>many learners it is these times, when they are operating at the edge of their</p><p>regime of competence, when learning is most exciting and rewarding. Sadly</p><p>in school, many so-called advantaged learners rarely get to operate at the</p><p>edge of their regime of competence as they coast along in a curriculum that</p><p>makes few real demands on them. At the same time, less advantaged learners</p><p>are repeatedly asked to operate outside their regime of competence.</p><p>Additional learning principles follow. These are principles found in good</p><p>video games, but ones that are hallmarks of deep (active and critical) learning</p><p>beyond video games as well.</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 70</p><p>71v LEARNING AND IDENTITY v</p><p>12. Practice Principle</p><p>Learners get lots and lots of practice in a context where the practice is</p><p>not boring (i.e., in a virtual world that is compelling to learners on</p><p>their own terms and where the learners experience ongoing success).</p><p>They spend lots of time on task.</p><p>13. Ongoing Learning Principle</p><p>The distinction between learner and master is vague, since learners,</p><p>thanks to the operation of the “regime of competence” principle</p><p>listed next, must, at higher and higher levels, undo their routinized</p><p>mastery to adapt to new or changed conditions. There are cycles of</p><p>new learning, automatization, undoing automatization, and new re-</p><p>organized automatization.</p><p>14. “Regime of Competence” Principle</p><p>The learner gets ample opportunity to operate within, but at the</p><p>outer edge of, his or her resources, so that at those points things are</p><p>felt as challenging but not “undoable.”</p><p>BIBL IOGRAPHICAL NOTE</p><p>There is a massive amount of work on socially situated identities and how they are</p><p>changing in the modern world. For work compatible with my approach in this chap-</p><p>ter, see Alvermann, Moon, & Hagood 1999; Bauman 2000; Beck, Giddens, & Lash</p><p>1994; Castells 1996; Foucault 1980; Gee 2000–2001; Gee, Hull, & Lankshear 1996;</p><p>Giddens 1991, 1992; Hacking 1995, 1998; Martin 1995; Mishler 2000; Rifkin 2000;</p><p>Sternberg & Grigorenko 1999; Taylor 1989, 1992, 1994. For an early, but brilliant</p><p>work on socially situated identities, specially relevant to science, see Fleck 1979, orig-</p><p>inally 1935.</p><p>For a discussion of the advantages of many middle- and upper-middle-class stu-</p><p>dents in our schools and the disadvantages of many minority and lower socioeco-</p><p>nomic students, see Finn 1999; Gee 1996; Heath 1983; Miller 1995; Varenne &</p><p>McDermott 1998.</p><p>For Erikson’s notion of a psychosocial moratorium, see Erikson 1968. Several of</p><p>the learning principles in this chapter relate closely to principles developed in current</p><p>accounts of efficacious learning in cognitive science; see, for example, Bransford,</p><p>Brown, & Cocking 1999 and Pellegrino, Chudowsky, & Glaser 2001. Several of the</p><p>principles fit very well with Bereiter and Scardamelia’s 1989 important discussion of</p><p>learning and expertise. The importance of gaining and undoing automatization, and</p><p>its connection to the ongoing learning principle, is well discussed in Bereiter and</p><p>Scardamelia’s book. The practice principle is discussed in sociocultural terms in</p><p>Scribner and Cole’s famous 1981 study. The regime of competence is discussed in</p><p>diSessa 2000 and is related to Vygotsky’s well-known notion of the zone of proximal</p><p>development; see Vygotsky 1978. diSessa 2000 also discusses amplification of input</p><p>and contains an extended and important discussion of committed learning.</p><p>04 gee ch 3 3/13/03 12:07 PM Page 71</p><p>This page intentionally left blank</p><p>4</p><p>SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING:</p><p>WHAT SHOULD YOU DO AFTER YOU HAVE</p><p>DESTROYED THE GLOBAL CONSPIRACY?</p><p>LEARNING AND EXPERIENCE</p><p>TRADITIONAL VIEWS OF LEARNING STRESS THE MIND AND NOT THE</p><p>body. Learning is held to be a matter of grand generalizations, principles, rules,</p><p>abstractions, and logical computations. This view treats the human mind as if it</p><p>is pretty much like a digital computer. Digital computers operate by rules that</p><p>tell them how to manipulate symbols, symbols that have no real meanings to</p><p>the computer beyond the manipulations the computer carries out on them.</p><p>Another view of learning holds that human learning and thinking does</p><p>not, in fact, always work this way and often does not work this way when hu-</p><p>mans are thinking at their best. This view holds, rather, that humans learn,</p><p>think, and solve problems by reflecting on their previous embodied experi-</p><p>ences in the world. That is, humans have experiences, store these experi-</p><p>ences, and make connections or associations among them.</p><p>Of course, humans don’t just store these experiences</p><p>in their minds “as</p><p>is.” Rather, they edit them according to their interests, values, goals, and so-</p><p>ciocultural memberships. This editing process helps them structure the ways</p><p>in which they pay attention to their experiences, foregrounding some things</p><p>in them and backgrounding others. Furthermore, it is the connections or as-</p><p>sociations that people make among their experiences that are crucial to learn-</p><p>ing, thinking, and problem solving.</p><p>When people are faced with a new situation in the world, aspects or ele-</p><p>ments of this situation remind them of aspects or elements of experiences</p><p>they have had in the past. They use these elements of past experience to think</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 73</p><p>74 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>about the new situation. Sometimes they can just apply past experience pretty</p><p>much as is to the new situation. Other times they have to adapt past experi-</p><p>ence, more or less, to apply it, in the process learning something new that</p><p>can, in turn, be applied to future situations.</p><p>Let me give you an overly simplified but instructive example of the contrast</p><p>between learning and thinking as using grand generalizations and learning and</p><p>thinking as using one’s embodied experiences in the world. Let’s say that you</p><p>have experienced in the past a number of white, middle-age, professors who</p><p>were born outside the middle class but who are now in the middle class. In each</p><p>case, say, these people displayed a good deal of “class conflict,”—that is, they</p><p>displayed a certain discomfort with their middle-class identities and associates.</p><p>Now consider two ways this information could be stored in your mind.</p><p>One way would be as verbal generalization, something like:</p><p>(Some? many?) white, middle-age, professors born outside the middle class,</p><p>but now in the middle class, display a good deal of class conflict.</p><p>The other way you could store your experiences of such people in your mind</p><p>is as a set of more or less strong connections or associations among all the ele-</p><p>ments that compose the experiences. That is, you would associate or connect</p><p>“being middle age,” more or less strongly, with each other element in the experi-</p><p>ences, namely, “being a professor,” “having been born outside the middle class,”</p><p>“being now middle class,” and “displaying a good deal of class conflict.” The</p><p>same is true of all the other elements, each of which must be associated with each</p><p>other element, more or less strongly. Perhaps you associate “being a professor”</p><p>strongly with “being middle class”; strongly, but somewhat less strongly, with</p><p>“being white”; and weakly with “having been born outside the middle class.”</p><p>You must form such links or associations between any and all of the ele-</p><p>ments that compose your experiences of these sorts of professors. Doing this</p><p>makes for complicated diagrams on paper, though the brain realizes such</p><p>things by forming more or less strong connections among (sets of) neurons in</p><p>terms of which notions like “being a professor” activate or remind you, more</p><p>or less strongly, of other notions like “being middle class” or “displaying class</p><p>conflict.” What we are talking about here, in reality, is patterns you are dis-</p><p>covering in your experiences and storing in your mind.</p><p>Now consider what happens when you are faced with an African Ameri-</p><p>can, middle-age, professor who was born outside the middle class but who is</p><p>now in the middle class. What do you conclude? If your mind has stored the</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 74</p><p>75v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>verbal generalization above, you conclude nothing, since this person, being</p><p>African American, does not fall under the generalization, which was, after all,</p><p>about white professors. A digital computer that has stored this generalization</p><p>as a set of symbols, confronted with the symbol “African American,” will sim-</p><p>ply not apply the generalization.</p><p>On the other hand, if you have stored the sorts of associations or links</p><p>between elements of your experiences just discussed, then, many of the fea-</p><p>tures or elements of this person’s situation will activate or remind you of</p><p>those associations. For example, the fact that this African American is a pro-</p><p>fessor but was born outside the middle class will bring to mind the likelihood</p><p>that he or she will display a good deal of class conflict. This is so because your</p><p>mind associates (fairly strongly) the combination of being a professor and</p><p>having been born outside the middle class with displaying class conflict.</p><p>While you may also associate being a professor with “being white,” you do</p><p>not use this association, since in this case you know the person is not white.</p><p>You suppress it and go with the others that lead you to predict you might find</p><p>this person displaying some degree of class conflict.</p><p>Of course, you might turn out to be wrong. Perhaps this African Ameri-</p><p>can professor is quite comfortable with his or her middle-class status. But one</p><p>has to make guesses and hypotheses to think, act, and problem-solve in the</p><p>world at all. All the cavepeople who stored the generalization “Tigers are</p><p>dangerous” and refused to apply it to even the first lion they saw probably</p><p>died without many offspring. The ones who let the many features lions share</p><p>with tigers trigger the association between these elements and danger passed</p><p>on a great many more genes.</p><p>If you turn out to be wrong, you will, perhaps, store a negative associa-</p><p>tion between “being African American” and “class conflict” and strengthen</p><p>your associations between “white” and “class conflict.” You will adjust a num-</p><p>ber of other associations, as well, though all rather tentatively, since so far</p><p>you have only one case to go on. If you experience many other cases of con-</p><p>tent middle-class African American professors born outside the middle class,</p><p>eventually you will revise your associations more confidently.</p><p>I pointed out that the view of the mind and learning that favors rules, ab-</p><p>stractions, and generalizations is connected to the digital computer as a</p><p>metaphor for how human thinking and learning work. The view of the mind</p><p>and learning that favors associations among the elements of our actual (and</p><p>vicarious) embodied experiences is itself connected to another sort of com-</p><p>puter: a so-called connectionist or parallel distributed network computer.</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 75</p><p>76 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>One of several sources of rich evidence that human thinking is deeply</p><p>rooted in embodied experience of the world comes from studies of human</p><p>languages. In all human languages, very often abstract notions are encoded in</p><p>words and phrases that constitute metaphors based in concrete, embodied ex-</p><p>perience of a material world. For example, consider how we talk about the</p><p>mind and thinking. We say things like “Why can’t you get this into your</p><p>head,” “Keep this in mind,” or “I can’t get the idea out of my head.” In all the</p><p>cases we treat the mind as a container that things can go in and out of.</p><p>For another example, consider how we talk about argumentation. We say</p><p>things like “He destroyed your point,” “She defended her own perspective,”</p><p>“She marshaled her arguments,” or “You need to challenge his basic premises,”</p><p>where we treat argumentation as a form of fighting or combat. Or, for a final</p><p>example, note how we talk about consciousness: “He came back to conscious-</p><p>ness,” “He lost consciousness,” “He went unconscious,” or “Try to bring the</p><p>experience back to conscious awareness;” here we treat consciousness as a sort</p><p>of place we can come to and leave.</p><p>There are, of course, a great many more such examples. The argument is</p><p>that just as language builds abstractions on the basis of concrete images from</p><p>embodied experience of a material world, so, too, does human learning and</p><p>thinking. One good way to make people look stupid is to ask them to learn</p><p>and think in terms of words and abstractions that they cannot connect in any</p><p>useful way to images or situations in their embodied experiences in the</p><p>world. Unfortunately,</p><p>we regularly do this in schools.</p><p>In this chapter I discuss the ways in which video games encourage and</p><p>recruit situated, experiential, and embodied forms of learning and thinking.</p><p>In this respect good video games incorporate quite good perspectives on how</p><p>learning, thinking, and problem solving work in the world and should work</p><p>in schools. I base my discussion, for concreteness, around a particular game,</p><p>the game Deus Ex.</p><p>DEUS EX</p><p>Deus Ex combines two different genres. It is a first-person shooter in which</p><p>you fight a variety of enemies from a first-person perspective. It is also a role-</p><p>playing game in which, like Arcanum, you have choices about how to build</p><p>and develop your character. Before you start playing the game, you choose</p><p>the name and look of your character. (Your character can be black or white,</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 76</p><p>77v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>for instance.) Whatever real name you choose, your character’s code name is</p><p>“J. C. Denton.” J. C. is a covert special operative for UNATCO, the United</p><p>Nations Anti-Terrorist Coalition. Note that this game came out well before</p><p>the events of September 11, 2001. In fact, the game raises interesting issues</p><p>about who is and who is not a “terrorist” and under what circumstances.</p><p>J. C. Denton is not fully human. He and his brother, Paul, have been</p><p>“augmented” via a technology that allows them to leverage advanced abilities</p><p>through the use of “nanite organisms” placed in their blood. Nanites are ro-</p><p>bots so tiny that they can fit inside individual cells. (They have been said to</p><p>be the future of robotics, tiny devices that could be used for things like clean-</p><p>ing out clogged arteries or performing other sorts of surgery inside the</p><p>body—however, I have no idea how far such technology has gone, or will go,</p><p>in the “real” world.) In this case, nanites have been injected into J. C. Den-</p><p>ton’s body. This gives him (you) the capacity to gain superhuman powers of</p><p>various sorts in the game world.</p><p>After choosing a real name and look for J. C. Denton, you get a certain</p><p>number of points with which you can increase his (your) skills. There are 11</p><p>skills (computers, electronics, environmental training, lock picking, medi-</p><p>cine, swimming, and skills with weapons of different types, including demoli-</p><p>tion devices, heavy weapons, low-tech weapons, pistols, and rifles). Each of</p><p>these skills has four levels of mastery (Untrained, Trained, Advanced, and</p><p>Master). You begin the game with each skill at Untrained Level, except for</p><p>skill with pistols, which begins at Trained Level. You use your initial points to</p><p>increase J. C.’s (your) training level in some of the other areas, though you</p><p>only have enough initial points to increase a few skills a bit. As you play the</p><p>game, you earn additional points with which you can further increase J. C.’s</p><p>(your) skills.</p><p>Enhancing certain skills and not others, at the beginning and throughout</p><p>the game, directly affects how you play. For example, if you are at the Expert</p><p>Level as a lock picker, then you can easily get into places you wouldn’t be able</p><p>to get into otherwise, unless you have found a key. If your Demolition</p><p>Weapons skills are no good, then you are quite likely to die if you try to dis-</p><p>arm a bomb. If your Computer skills are good, you can hack more easily into</p><p>the myriad of computational devices you find in the world of Deus Ex; other-</p><p>wise you have to gain such information through other sources, if you can.</p><p>When I played the game, toward the end, at a point where I knew I was</p><p>about to face a great many powerful robots and other enemies, I found a very</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 77</p><p>78 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>large gun in a dark corner of a military base, quite suitable for blowing robots</p><p>off the face of the earth. Alas, I did not have any great skill at Heavy</p><p>Weapons, so stealth and more subtle fighting strategies were the order of the</p><p>day. (Truth be told, I used the experience points I gained using these more</p><p>subtle strategies to increase my Heavy Weapons training, went back and got</p><p>the gun, and had great fun blasting robots with a single shot.)</p><p>But choosing J. C’s skill levels is not the only way in which you can develop</p><p>him. As I said above, he is “nano-augmented.” In fact, he has slots for nano-</p><p>augmentations distributed around his body. You begin the game with three</p><p>nano-augmentations already installed: an Infolink that allows J. C. to receive</p><p>real-time neural communications from commanders and allies; an IFF (Identi-</p><p>fication: Friend or Foe) system that analyzes people and tells J. C. whether they</p><p>are hostile or not; and a Light that runs off J. C.’s own biological system.</p><p>You can fill the unfilled slots as you find special augmentation canisters</p><p>in the game world. Canisters contain blueprints for two special abilities, such</p><p>as having the strength to lift a truck or the ability to see through concrete</p><p>walls. When you install a canister into the appropriate slot on J. C.’s body,</p><p>thereby releasing its nanite organisms into his bloodstream, you must choose</p><p>one, and only one, of the two special abilities associated with that particular</p><p>canister. Once you fill a slot, that augmentation is permanently installed, and</p><p>the second option is gone forever. So you must choose wisely. The augmen-</p><p>tations you select greatly affect how you (J. C. Denton) develop in the game</p><p>world and what strategies will be most advantageous against different foes</p><p>and challenges. You can also find upgrade canisters that allow you to upgrade</p><p>any augmentations you have already installed, thereby making them stronger</p><p>or more efficient.</p><p>Besides developing J. C.’s skills and nano-augmentations, there are other</p><p>ways in which the player’s decisions affect how the game will unfold. In your</p><p>role as J. C. Denton, you have conversations with a number of other charac-</p><p>ters. You can choose different things to say and different ways to respond.</p><p>How you have carried out a conversation with a given character will affect</p><p>what that character thinks of you, how he or she reacts to you, and what he or</p><p>she will later do or not do for or against you. Furthermore, you face other</p><p>sorts of consequential choices in the world of Deus Ex, and how you make</p><p>such choices affects what happens later in the game.</p><p>When you start the game, you enter a futuristic world that has fallen on</p><p>hard times. Crime, terrorism, and disease are out of all control. No single</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 78</p><p>79v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>government or agency can react fast or efficiently enough to control the</p><p>worldwide devastation. In particular, a horrible plague, known as the Grey</p><p>Death, is sweeping through cities and countries around the world over,</p><p>killing millions. There is only one known cure for the disease, a vaccine</p><p>called Ambrosia, a product that is in short supply and manufactured by the</p><p>U.S. corporation VersaLife.</p><p>One of UNATCO’s duties is to administer this cure for the Grey Death.</p><p>However, the general public does not know that the cure exists. It is kept a</p><p>secret and given only to politicians, dignitaries, and billionaires to ensure that</p><p>the world’s economy does not crash. Or so the rich and powerful claim.</p><p>Nothing is ever as it seems at first in Deus Ex.</p><p>J. C. Denton’s first mission takes place on Liberty Island, New York, site</p><p>of the Statue of Liberty. Inside the statue, a terrorist group knows as the NSF</p><p>is holding an UNATCO agent hostage. J. C. (you) soon discovers that the</p><p>NSF is aware of Ambrosia and intends to replicate it and release it to the</p><p>public. This begins a wild adventure in which you move to various sites and</p><p>cities across the world (all rendered in great futuristic detail, based on actual</p><p>architectural maps), uncovering plots and conspiracies, solving a great many</p><p>problems, and fighting enemies of all sorts.</p><p>Deus Ex involves a good many moral dilemmas. For example, you dis-</p><p>cover, fairly early on, that the NSF are not really the “bad guys” and you and</p><p>your fellow UNATCO soldiers are not</p><p>really the “good guys.” Yet you have</p><p>already killed a number of NSF soldiers. If you have been too enthusiastically</p><p>gung ho in this enterprise, you are left with a very real sense of guilt. In fact,</p><p>when I returned to the UNATCO base from one of my first missions and</p><p>told the munitions officer, a seasoned veteran, how I had performed, he told</p><p>me that I was not a real soldier, because I too readily killed the enemy rather</p><p>than attempting to sneak past them when I could. He refused to give me</p><p>more ammunition, telling me to use what I had left more carefully and hu-</p><p>manely. Thus, when I discovered that the NSF troops were not really the ter-</p><p>rorists UNATCO claimed, I felt all the more guilty.</p><p>Later in the game you are forced to choose whether to save your badly</p><p>wounded brother, Paul, now fighting at your side against UNATCO, or to</p><p>escape and let him die in order to go on fighting for your current cause. (In-</p><p>deed, Paul urges you to go on and leave him to protect your retreat.) If you</p><p>save your brother (and survive yourself, of course), he plays a role later in the</p><p>story; if you don’t, he doesn’t, though you later see his body in one of your</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 79</p><p>80 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>enemies’ bases. When I played Deus Ex, I let Paul die and have regretted it</p><p>ever since. (At the time, I didn’t feel I had the requisite game-playing skills to</p><p>save him—but perhaps that was just a lame self-exonerating excuse.)</p><p>By the time Deus Ex ends, you know a great deal more than you did at</p><p>the beginning. You have discovered that the world is, in fact, run by a small</p><p>number of rich global elites, elites who hide behind and control forces like</p><p>the U.S. government, many members of which don’t themselves fully under-</p><p>stand who is actually pulling the strings in the global world. These elites have</p><p>helped bring on all the devastation in the world, and they benefit by it. At the</p><p>conclusion of the game, three opposing figures (each of whom has been help-</p><p>ing you) try to convince you to engage in a different set of specific final ac-</p><p>tions that will end the game in three different ways.</p><p>One figure tells you the world will always be run by a small elite, though</p><p>the current ones are selfish, evil, and corrupt. He tells you that you and he</p><p>and his allies should replace this ruling elite and that all of you will behave</p><p>more humanely, because you are better people. If you do what he suggests,</p><p>you will become one of the elite rulers of the world—and, indeed, you (J. C.</p><p>Denton) are a moral force and incorruptible force, are you not?</p><p>Another figure tells you that the world will always be run by a small elite as</p><p>long as there is a global world tied together through global networked commu-</p><p>nications. This figure encourages you to engage in actions that will destroy this</p><p>global communicational infrastructure, returning the world to small and tech-</p><p>nologically primitive villages that will not be closely connected to each other in</p><p>any larger system. This, he claims, is the only moral and humane future.</p><p>The last figure agrees that the world will always be run by a small elite,</p><p>especially if the world is a globally interconnected into one big system, as it</p><p>is. But this figure, who happens to be not a human but a massive and sophis-</p><p>ticated artificial intelligence, tells you that the only moral and humane way</p><p>forward is to have him—a completely dispassionate and rational being—run</p><p>the world, not human beings, any of whom will simply be corrupted by their</p><p>passions and by power. Humans have failed, over all of history, to institute a</p><p>nonviolent, humane world for everyone. Only a purely rational and logical</p><p>being can make good decisions. The artificial intelligence device tells you to</p><p>engage in actions that will allow it to rule.</p><p>You must choose which ending to bring on. Yourself as an incorruptible</p><p>elite? Return to small villages? Rational rule by artificial intelligence? I must</p><p>admit, I was thrilled at the end of Deus Ex as I (J. C. Denton) ran from the</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 80</p><p>81v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>ruins of the massive global communicational infrastructure collapsing all</p><p>around me after what I had just done and returned the world to a plethora of</p><p>small villages. You might have decided otherwise.</p><p>Deus Ex has one feature that is characteristic of good video games,</p><p>though the feature is stronger in this game than in many others: There are</p><p>nearly always multiple solutions to any given problem. Players can choose</p><p>strategies that fit with their style of learning, thinking, and acting. This, of</p><p>course, is highly motivating both for learning and for playing the game and a</p><p>rich source for reflecting on one’s own styles of learning and problem solving</p><p>(and, perhaps, experimenting with new ones).</p><p>STORYING AND L IVING IN</p><p>THE VIRTUAL WORLD OF A VIDEO GAME</p><p>Deus Ex has a rich, ever-twisting and turning story line. However, story in Deus</p><p>Ex, and other video games with rich stories, functions quite differently than it</p><p>does in books or movies. A book or movie can tell its story from first episode to</p><p>last or it can begin in the middle of the action and only later get to the initial</p><p>events in the story. In either case, the reader or viewer knows someone else (the</p><p>“author”) has determined the order in which events in the story will be encoun-</p><p>tered. This “author” (which, of course, can be multiple people) also determines</p><p>the sources through which the reader or viewer gains crucial information. For</p><p>example, a crucial piece of information may be in a conversation between two</p><p>lovers rather than in a hidden diary. In a video game, on the other hand, some</p><p>players will gain such information one way and others in another way.</p><p>In Deus Ex, the player uncovers the story bit by bit as he or she discovers</p><p>documents, hacks into computers, overhears or engages in conversations, or</p><p>sees things happen. Different players find different things and discover infor-</p><p>mation relevant to the story line in a different order. Furthermore, the player</p><p>him- or herself engages in actions that are themselves part of the story line</p><p>and different players will engage in different actions or the same ones in a</p><p>different order.</p><p>The story line in a video game is a mixture of four things:</p><p>1. The game designers’ (“author’s”) choices</p><p>2. How you, the player, have caused these choices to unfold in your spe-</p><p>cific case by the order in which you have found things</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 81</p><p>82 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>3. The actions you as one of the central characters in the story carry out</p><p>(since in good video games there is a good deal of choice as to what to</p><p>do, when to do it, and in what order to do it)</p><p>4. Your own imaginative projection about the characters, plot, and</p><p>world of the story</p><p>The first and fourth of these items are true of books and movies, as well, but</p><p>items 2 and 3 are true of video games only.</p><p>Thus, in video games like Deus Ex, stories are embodied in the player’s</p><p>own choices and actions in a way they cannot be in books and movies. Let’s</p><p>just call them, for short, “embodied stories.” When I use the term “embod-</p><p>ied,” I mean to include the mind as a part of the body. So “embodied” means,</p><p>for me, “in the body” and/or “in the mind.” It’s too bad there is no word</p><p>“emminded” to go alongside “embodied.” When I talk about a person’s em-</p><p>bodied experiences in the world (virtual or real), I mean to cover all the per-</p><p>ceptions, actions, choices, and mental simulations of action or dialogue.</p><p>This is not to say that stories in video games are better or worse than sto-</p><p>ries in books and movies. Each form has its own advantages and disadvantages.</p><p>For example, since stories in video games are embodied in you the player, you</p><p>(i.e., the character you are playing) cannot die and stay dead (you can die, but</p><p>then you start the game again from a saved point or from the beginning). Oth-</p><p>erwise, the game would be over before its “ending.” In a book or movie, you</p><p>can get quite sad and</p><p>upset when a character you empathize with dies (you</p><p>know that the character probably won’t being coming back, unless it’s a super-</p><p>natural story, and when characters we like do come back in books and movies,</p><p>we sometimes cry because it is such a rare, unreal, and special event).</p><p>When the character you are playing dies in video game (and it is always,</p><p>of course, a main character), you can get sad and upset, but you also usually</p><p>get “pissed” that you (the player) have failed. Perhaps you even feel that you</p><p>have failed your character. And then you start again, usually from a saved</p><p>game, motivated to do better. This is part of what it means to call these</p><p>video-game stories embodied stories. The emotional investments you have in</p><p>a video-game story are entirely different from the emotional investments you</p><p>have in a book or movie.</p><p>There are all sorts of reasons why stories in video games cannot (yet?) be,</p><p>in a sense, as deep or rich as stories in good books and movies. For example, a</p><p>video game must work out different futures based on choices different players</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 82</p><p>83v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>have made and different things they have done earlier in the game. This creates</p><p>a computational problem that books and movies do not face, since in a book or</p><p>movie the designer always knows what choices have been made earlier. (Al-</p><p>though quite simple “choose your own adventure” books are available.) Fur-</p><p>thermore, real conversation is beyond the current computational power of a</p><p>video game, since human beings can make so many different responses to any-</p><p>thing said to them. A game like Deus Ex carries out conversations by giving the</p><p>player a choice among several different things to say. Again, creating flexible,</p><p>unpredictable conversations is a computational problem that books and movies</p><p>do not face, since they simply script specific set dialogue.</p><p>Video games compensate for these limitations by creating what I have</p><p>called embodied stories, stories that involve and motivate the player in a dif-</p><p>ferent way than do the stories in books and movies. One intriguing thing I</p><p>have found about video-game stories is that I am so involved at the level of ac-</p><p>tion—worrying about where I am, what’s to be found there, what I am doing,</p><p>what good or bad things might happen to me, what needs doing right now—</p><p>that the larger story line often seems to float somewhat vaguely above me. I</p><p>can’t quite pull all the pieces together, since I’m too busy right now and, in</p><p>any case, some of the pieces I discovered long ago are a bit hazy now. I can, of</p><p>course, later (in a safe place) stop and try to put the pieces together, and I can</p><p>then also usually look things up in notes games often keep for players.</p><p>Thus, although every once in a while in playing a game I do pause to</p><p>consider the bigger picture—I certainly had to, at the end of the game, be-</p><p>fore I decided to send the world back to small villages—there is also a deli-</p><p>cious feeling of being in the midst of things, looking at the world from the</p><p>ground up and not from a God’s-eye perspective. I suppose this is, again, part</p><p>of what it means to call these stories “embodied stories.” But it is also a whole</p><p>lot like what “real” life is like. (Also, it is a lot like what it feels like to engage</p><p>in an academic discipline when one does research and doesn’t just study</p><p>things after they have become all cut and dried.)</p><p>Again, video-game stories are not better or worse than stories in books and</p><p>movies. They are different. They offer different pleasures and frustrations.</p><p>S ITUATED AND EMBODIED MEANINGS</p><p>The embodied nature of video-game stories brings out a crucial feature. In</p><p>video games, meaning (sense, significance) is itself situation-specific and</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 83</p><p>84 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>embodied. In the chapter 2 I argued that this is how meaning operates when</p><p>people actually know what they are doing in a domain and can do more than</p><p>mindlessly repeat words and other symbols that they cannot situate inside</p><p>any real practice. Video games are particularly good examples of how learn-</p><p>ing and thinking work in any semiotic domain when learning and thinking</p><p>are powerful and effective, not passive and inert.</p><p>In games like Deus Ex, the meaning of any event, object, artifact, conver-</p><p>sation, written note, or any other potentially meaningful sign is up for grabs.</p><p>You don’t really know what it means unless and until you can give it a specific</p><p>meaning in terms of the world through which you are moving as a character</p><p>or the actual actions you carry out in that world. Furthermore, as that world</p><p>and your actions in it change, the meanings of things you have seen or dis-</p><p>covered can change as well. That is, meanings in video games are always spe-</p><p>cific to specific situations. They are always actively assembled (or changed)</p><p>by the player, on the spot, in terms of images, materials, and embodied ac-</p><p>tions in the virtual world being mutually created by the game and the player.</p><p>In other words, meanings in video games are what I called, in chapter 2, “sit-</p><p>uated meanings” or “situation-specific meanings,” not just general ones.</p><p>Take something as simple as a numerical code—say five numbers—that</p><p>you find on a desk or hack from a computer while playing Deus Ex. It’s pretty</p><p>clear that this code is nearly meaningless—not completely so, of course, since</p><p>you know that it’s a code of some sort. The code, at this point, just has a de-</p><p>contextualized, general meaning, the meaning “code of some sort.” This</p><p>code means nothing until you find something (e.g., a safe, a locked door, a</p><p>computer) that it can be used on to some good effect. Then the numbers take</p><p>on the situated, embodied, action-oriented meaning “opens this safe.”</p><p>There is a wonderful moment in Deus Ex when a completely evil and</p><p>powerful cyborg woman at the UNATCO command center, a creature who</p><p>has threatened me (J. C. Denton) throughout a large part of the game, is</p><p>about to kill me when I have switched sides away from UNATCO. She ex-</p><p>pects an all-out fight at which I am quite likely to lose badly. But I have</p><p>found—unbeknownst to her—a code word in a computer that will cause her</p><p>cyborgian mechanisms to self-destruct should I utter it in her presence.</p><p>Those who have not found the code must fight her. I, on the other hand,</p><p>utter the code word and experience a delicious moment of wonderfully em-</p><p>bodied and situated meaning (much as I did when I first realized that fractal</p><p>equations lead to marvelous patterns when you feed them into a computer or</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 84</p><p>85v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>actually graph them on a piece of paper, rather than learn just to repeat them</p><p>and verbally list their numerical properties).</p><p>What I have said about a set of numbers found on a discarded note in</p><p>Deus Ex is true, too, of any written note or diary you find in the game. It’s</p><p>true of any words you hear as well. To make sense of them you must fit them</p><p>into the emerging plot and virtual world you are discovering and helping to</p><p>build. And you must do this actively, since you have choices about where to</p><p>go and what to do. Every potentially meaningful sign in a game like Deus</p><p>Ex—whether word, deed, artifact, or action—is a particular sort of invitation</p><p>to embodied action (action actually carried out or simulated in the mind). And</p><p>the nature of that invitation changes as you experience new situations and en-</p><p>gage in new actions in the virtual world of the game.</p><p>Even something that seems to have a set and general meaning—a lock</p><p>pick, for example—takes on different meanings in different situations. For</p><p>example, at a certain point you may have but one lock pick left. Then that</p><p>lock pick comes to mean something like: try other ways into doors, use this lock</p><p>pick as last resort, because there may be more important doors coming up. Notice</p><p>that if you don’t assemble some useful meaning for the lock pick, bad effects</p><p>can happen to you in the virtual world of the game.</p><p>There is a price to be</p><p>paid for not thinking at a situation-specific level and in terms of embodied</p><p>actions in the game.</p><p>Of course, one might now say, “Well, that’s just how meaning works in</p><p>video games—it isn’t and shouldn’t be that way outside of games, say, in</p><p>school.” You already know from the discussion in chapter 2 that I disagree</p><p>with this view. General, purely verbal meanings, meanings that a person has</p><p>no ability to customize for specific situations and that offer the person no in-</p><p>vitations for embodied actions in different situations, are useless (save for</p><p>passing tests in school).</p><p>This theory of meaning as situated and embodied fits well with some</p><p>current work that I believe to be at the cutting edge of psychological research</p><p>on how comprehension of oral and written language works when it works ef-</p><p>fectively. For example, consider these two remarks:</p><p>. . . comprehension is grounded in perceptual simulations that prepare</p><p>agents for situated action.</p><p>. . . to a particular person, the meaning of an object, event, or sentence is</p><p>what that person can do with the object, event, or sentence.</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 85</p><p>86 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>While video games actively encourage such situated and embodied</p><p>thinking and doing, school often does not. In school, words and meanings</p><p>usually float free of material conditions and embodied actions. They take on</p><p>only general, so-called decontextualized meanings. Their meanings just</p><p>amount to spelling out a word or phrase in terms of still other words and</p><p>phrases, themselves with only general meanings. People (like the college</p><p>physics students discussed in the chapter 2) cannot actually do anything with</p><p>these words. (They cannot even simulate or carry out a conversation with</p><p>these meanings, a conversation in which what they know is used flexibly and</p><p>adapted differently to specific situations being discussed.)</p><p>Imagine you were to design a video game in which the player, a student</p><p>of architecture, had to learn a new 3-D architectural drafting system, a quite</p><p>complicated symbol system. (Such a game does exist, though I have not</p><p>played it.) Certainly learning such a system is equivalent in complexity to tak-</p><p>ing a class on a new language or a new academic area in school. If this game</p><p>operated like a good video game, then the player’s understandings of this new</p><p>system—all its words, symbols, and procedures—would have to be embodied</p><p>in materials, images, and actions in the game’s virtual world. Furthermore,</p><p>the player’s understandings would have to change and transform in new and</p><p>different situations. Additionally, the player would have to actively assemble</p><p>these understandings on the spot and face real consequences in the virtual</p><p>world for these assemblies. In fact, it is these consequences that allow the</p><p>player to test whether the situation- and action-specific meanings he or she</p><p>has constructed are viable or not.</p><p>Compare this to sitting these students down and having them read books,</p><p>listen to lectures, and discuss these matters apart from any real consequences.</p><p>In this case, the students would have only general and/or verbal meanings, not</p><p>embodied ones that they can customize to and for different situations of actual</p><p>practice. I am not saying that we need to teach these architecture students—or</p><p>any others—via video games. Good classrooms can teach people how to situ-</p><p>ate and embody meanings in a variety of different ways, though this may in-</p><p>volve getting out of the classroom from time to time.</p><p>I suppose we are unlikely to teach people new to drafting via just reading</p><p>and telling. (Though we do often try to teach adults who already know some-</p><p>thing about an older drafting system a new one via this route—it works as</p><p>well as you’d expect, which is not well at all.) But we do routinely try to teach</p><p>children things like science and math this way in our schools.</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 86</p><p>87v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>Now someone’s sure to say: “But we cannot teach children everything</p><p>they need to learn in school, things like science and math, in ways that</p><p>make sense in terms of situated meanings and embodied actions. There</p><p>just isn’t enough time, and, after all, they’re not all going to become scien-</p><p>tists.” There is a sort of good common sense in this remark, but the prob-</p><p>lem is this: There really is no other way to make sense. If all you know—in</p><p>any domain—are general meanings, then you really don’t know anything</p><p>that makes sense to you.</p><p>Of course, students in a science classroom do not need to know how to</p><p>situate meanings in all the contexts a “real” scientist does. And they don’t</p><p>need to be experts at situating meanings in the sort of science they are study-</p><p>ing. But they do need to know how some important and central situated</p><p>meanings work in the semiotic domain—to have some embodied feel for the</p><p>matter. Otherwise they have, in reality, no idea how or why words and other</p><p>sorts of signs in the domain make sense.</p><p>Imagine a person who claims to know what the word “democracy”</p><p>means, because she can give you a dictionary definition of the word or, per-</p><p>haps, a definition she has gotten out of a social studies textbook. However,</p><p>faced with the following claim, she can make no intelligent response that</p><p>speaks in any situated way to the situation the claim is about (i.e., the impact</p><p>of wealth on elections in some countries):</p><p>A country is not a democracy when candidates must take contributions from</p><p>wealthy people in order to run for office, since then only wealthy people de-</p><p>termine the slate of candidates.</p><p>The responder does not have to agree with this claim. But he or she</p><p>surely has to see the sort of situated meaning being given to “democracy” in</p><p>the claim. Further, he or she must then either accept that situated meaning or</p><p>counter it with another situated meaning customized for (i.e., situationally</p><p>relevant) to the situation the claim is dealing with. This is dialogue as en-</p><p>gaged action. If you can’t use “democracy” in a situation-specific way in such</p><p>dialogues, then the word does not make sense to you, no matter how well you</p><p>can repeat a dictionary definition for the word.</p><p>Let me give one more example, again taking a rather mundane word. A</p><p>faculty colleague of mine who is an avid proponent of phonics instruction in</p><p>the early grades said to me once, “Kids are coming to college unable to read</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 87</p><p>88 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>the books I assign.” He blamed this situation on a lack of early phonics in-</p><p>struction. (The students were victims, he claimed, of Whole Language.)</p><p>Thus, he was giving the word “read” the situated meaning: able to decode print,</p><p>that is, translate letters into sounds.</p><p>However, this situated meaning, in fact, does not work well for the very</p><p>situation the faculty member was describing. These students can almost cer-</p><p>tainly decode print, and many can decode it quite well. This is a matter that</p><p>can be checked quite easily (by asking them to decode complex nonsense</p><p>words out of context). The problem these students have—if they do indeed</p><p>have a problem—is that they cannot comprehend the complex academic lan-</p><p>guage of college textbooks well. Such language is quite different from “every-</p><p>day” colloquial language and requires students to have heard and read a good</p><p>bit of it before they are very adept at doing so. The faculty member’s claim</p><p>has a chance of being true only if the word “read” is given a situated meaning</p><p>something like: able to understand text at a level that goes beyond mere decoding</p><p>and knowledge of the literal meanings of everyday words and phrases to an under-</p><p>standing of the specialist language of writing that is more technical than everyday</p><p>language.</p><p>Let me end this discussion of situated meaning with an example relevant</p><p>to science education, an example that will take us away from words toward</p><p>situated and embodied meanings for other sorts of symbols. The science edu-</p><p>cator Andrea diSessa has successfully</p><p>of</p><p>human variation. (The plasma that physicists deal with is not, as he told me, a</p><p>product from blood but a state of matter; when I asked him why he had not</p><p>brought any to the party, he explained to me that plasma is so unstable and</p><p>dangerous that if he had brought any, there would have been no party.)</p><p>Oddly enough, then, confronting what was, for me, a new form of learn-</p><p>ing and thinking was both frustrating and life enhancing. This was a state</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 5</p><p>6 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>that I could remember from my days in graduate school and earlier in my ca-</p><p>reer (and when I changed careers midstream). Having long routinized my</p><p>ways of learning and thinking, however, I had forgotten this state. It brought</p><p>back home to me, forcefully, that learning is or should be both frustrating</p><p>and life enhancing. The key is finding ways to make hard things life enhanc-</p><p>ing so that people keep going and don’t fall back on learning and thinking</p><p>only what is simple and easy.</p><p>My third realization followed from these other two. I eventually finished</p><p>The New Adventures of the Time Machine and moved onto Deus Ex, a game I</p><p>chose because it had won Game of the Year on many Internet game sites. Deus</p><p>Ex is yet longer and harder than Time Machine. I found myself asking the fol-</p><p>lowing question: “How, in heaven’s name, do they sell many of these games</p><p>when they are so long and hard?” I soon discovered, of course, that good</p><p>video games (like Deus Ex) sell millions of copies. Indeed, the video-game in-</p><p>dustry makes as much or more money each year than the film industry.</p><p>So here we have something that is long, hard, and challenging. However,</p><p>you cannot play a game if you cannot learn it. If no one plays a game, it does</p><p>not sell, and the company that makes it goes broke. Of course, designers</p><p>could keep making the games shorter and simpler to facilitate learning.</p><p>That’s often what schools do. But no, in this case, game designers keep mak-</p><p>ing the games longer and more challenging (and introduce new things in new</p><p>ones), and still manage to get them learned. How?</p><p>If you think about it, you see a Darwinian sort of thing going on here. If</p><p>a game, for whatever reason, has good principles of learning built into its de-</p><p>sign—that is, if it facilitates learning in good ways—then it gets played and</p><p>can sell a lot of copies, if it is otherwise good as well. Other games can build</p><p>on these principles and, perhaps, do them one step better. If a game has poor</p><p>learning principles built into its design, then it won’t get learned or played</p><p>and won’t sell well. Its designers will seek work elsewhere. In the end, then,</p><p>video games represent a process, thanks to what Marx called the “creativity of</p><p>capitalism,” that leads to better and better designs for good learning and, in-</p><p>deed, good learning of hard and challenging things.</p><p>It would seem intriguing, then, to investigate what these principles of</p><p>learning are. How are good video games designed to enhance getting them-</p><p>selves learned—learned well and quickly so people can play and enjoy them</p><p>even when they are long and hard? What we are really looking for here is</p><p>this: the theory of human learning built into good video games.</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 6</p><p>7v INTRODUCTION v</p><p>Of course, there is an academic field devoted to studying how human be-</p><p>ings learn best and well, namely the field of cognitive science. So we can,</p><p>then, compare the theory of learning in good video games to theories of</p><p>learning in cognitive science. Who’s got the best theory? Well, it turns out</p><p>that the theory of learning in good video games is close to what I believe are</p><p>the best theories of learning in cognitive science. And this is not because</p><p>game designers read academic texts on learning. Most of them don’t. They</p><p>spent too much of their time in high school and beyond playing with com-</p><p>puters and playing games.</p><p>And, too, there is a key place—though hardly the only one—where</p><p>learning takes place: school. So, we also can ask how the theory of learning in</p><p>good video games compares to how teaching and learning work in school.</p><p>Here we face a mixed bag, indeed. On one hand, the theory of learning in</p><p>good video games fits well with what are I believe to be the best sorts of sci-</p><p>ence instruction in school. On the other hand, this sort of science instruction</p><p>is rare and getting yet rarer as testing and skill-and-drill retake our schools.</p><p>In turn, the theories of learning one would infer from looking at schools</p><p>today comport very poorly with the theory of learning in good video games.</p><p>If the principles of learning in good video games are good, then better</p><p>theories of learning are embedded in the video games many children in ele-</p><p>mentary and particularly in high school play than in the schools they attend.</p><p>Furthermore, the theory of learning in good video games fits better with the</p><p>modern, high-tech, global world today’s children and teenagers live in than</p><p>do the theories (and practices) of learning that they see in school. Today’s</p><p>world is very different from the world baby boomers like me grew up in and</p><p>on which we have based many of our theories. Is it a wonder, then, that by</p><p>high school, very often both good students and bad ones, rich ones and poor</p><p>ones, don’t much like school?</p><p>This book discusses 36 principles of learning (individually in each chap-</p><p>ter and listed together in the appendix) that I argue are built into good video</p><p>games. From the way I opened this introduction, you already know that,</p><p>while this book deals with learning, it will most certainly deal with learners</p><p>(players) embedded in a material and social world. How could it be other-</p><p>wise? After all, they are playing a game. Video games—like many other</p><p>games—are inherently social, though, in video games, sometimes the other</p><p>players are fantasy creatures endowed, by the computer, with artificial intelli-</p><p>gence and sometimes they are real people playing out fantasy roles.</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 7</p><p>8 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>However, this book has another goal as well. It seeks to use the discus-</p><p>sion of video games to introduce the reader to three important areas of cur-</p><p>rent research and to relate these areas together. One of these areas is work on</p><p>“situated cognition” (i.e., thinking as tied to a body that has experiences in</p><p>the world). This work argues that human learning is not just a matter of what</p><p>goes on inside people’s heads but is fully embedded in (situated within) a ma-</p><p>terial, social, and cultural world. Another one of these areas is the so-called</p><p>New Literacy Studies, a body of work that argues that reading and writing</p><p>should be viewed not only as mental achievements going on inside people’s</p><p>heads but also as social and cultural practices with economic, historical, and</p><p>political implications.</p><p>Obviously, these two bodies of work have much in common, though their</p><p>advocates often disagree with each other over details. People in New Literacy</p><p>Studies often distrust psychology more than people working in the area of sit-</p><p>uated cognition. And, too, people working in New Literacy Studies tend to be</p><p>more “political” than people working in the area of situated cognition.</p><p>The third area is work on so-called connectionism, a view that stresses the</p><p>ways in which human beings are powerful pattern-recognizers. This body of</p><p>work argues that humans don’t often think best when they attempt to reason</p><p>via logic and general abstract principles detached from experience. Rather,</p><p>they think best when they reason on the basis of patterns they have picked up</p><p>through their actual experiences in the world, patterns that, over time, can be-</p><p>come generalized but that are still rooted in specific areas of experience.</p><p>This view of the mind is obviously one way to spell out what it means to</p><p>say thinking and reasoning are “situated.” I argue that it is one way to spell</p><p>out how and why reading, writing, and thinking are inextricably linked to so-</p><p>cial and cultural practices. I don’t actually</p><p>taught children in sixth grade and be-</p><p>yond the algebra behind Galileo’s principles of motion (principles related to</p><p>Newton’s laws) by teaching them a specific computer programming language</p><p>called Boxer.</p><p>The students write into the computer a set of discrete steps in the pro-</p><p>gramming language. For example, the first command in a little program</p><p>meant to represent uniform motion might tell the computer to set the speed</p><p>of a moving object at one meter per second. The second step might tell the</p><p>computer to move the object. And a third step might tell the computer to re-</p><p>peat the second step over and over again. Once the program starts running,</p><p>the student will see a graphical object move one meter each second repeat-</p><p>edly, a form of uniform motion.</p><p>Now the student can elaborate the model in various ways. For example,</p><p>the student might add a fourth step that tells the computer to add a value a to</p><p>the speed of the moving object after each movement the object has taken (let</p><p>us just say, for convenience, that a adds one more meter per second at each</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 88</p><p>89v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>step). So now, after the first movement on the screen (when the object has</p><p>moved at the speed of one meter per second), the computer will set the speed</p><p>of the object at two meters per second (adding one meter), and, then, on the</p><p>next movement, the object will move at the speed of two meters per second.</p><p>After this the computer will add another meter per second to the speed, and</p><p>on the next movement the object will move at the speed of three meters per</p><p>second. And so forth forever, unless the student has added a step that tells the</p><p>computer when to stop repeating the movements. This process is obviously</p><p>modeling the concept of acceleration. And, of course, you can set a to be a</p><p>negative number instead of a positive one, and watch what happens to the</p><p>moving object over time instead.</p><p>The student can keep elaborating the program and watch what happens</p><p>at every stage. In this process, the student, with the guidance of a good</p><p>teacher, can discover a good deal about Galileo’s principles of motion</p><p>through his or her actions in writing the program, watching what happens,</p><p>and changing the program. What the student is doing here is seeing in an</p><p>embodied way, tied to action, how a representational system that is less ab-</p><p>stract than algebra or calculus (namely, the computer programming lan-</p><p>guage, which is actually composed of a set of boxes) “cashes out” in terms of</p><p>motion in a virtual world on the computer screen.</p><p>An algebraic representation of Galileo’s principles is more general, basi-</p><p>cally a set of numbers and variables that do not directly tie to actions or</p><p>movements as material things. As diSessa points out, algebra doesn’t distin-</p><p>guish effectively “among motion (d = rt), converting meters to inches (i =</p><p>39.37 x m), defining coordinates of a straight line (y = mx) or a host of other</p><p>conceptually varied situations.” They all just look alike. He goes on to point</p><p>out that “[d]istinguishing these contexts is critical in learning, although it is</p><p>probably nearly irrelevant in fluid, routine work for experts,” who, of course,</p><p>have already had many embodied experiences in using algebra for a variety of</p><p>different purposes of their own.</p><p>Once learners have experienced the meanings of Galileo’s principles</p><p>about motion in a situated and embodied way, they have understood one of</p><p>the situated meanings for the algebraic equations that capture these princi-</p><p>ples at a more abstract level. Now these equations are beginning to take on a</p><p>real meaning in terms of embodied understandings. As learners see algebra</p><p>spelled out in more such specific material situations, they will come to master</p><p>it in an active and critical way, not just as a set of symbols to be repeated in a</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 89</p><p>90 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>passive and rote manner on tests. As diSessa puts it: “Programming turns</p><p>analysis into experience and allows a connection between analytic forms and</p><p>their experiential implications that algebra and even calculus can’t touch.”</p><p>diSessa knows what good video games know, but schools often don’t:</p><p>Meaning is material, situated, and embodied if and when it is useful. Abstract</p><p>systems originally got their meanings through such embodied experiences</p><p>for those who really understand them. Abstraction rises gradually out of the</p><p>ground of situated meaning and practice and returns there from time to time,</p><p>or it is meaningless to most human beings.</p><p>THE PROBE, HYPOTHESIZE,</p><p>REPROBE, RETHINK CYCLE</p><p>Because video games so nicely exemplify the nature of meaning as situated</p><p>and embodied, they are also capable of capturing—and allowing players to</p><p>practice—a process that is the hallmark of “reflective practice” in areas like</p><p>law, medicine, teaching, art, or any other area where there are expert practi-</p><p>tioners. Playing a good video game like Deus Ex well requires the player to</p><p>engage in the following four-step process:</p><p>1. The player must probe the virtual world (which involves looking</p><p>around the current environment, clicking on something, or engaging</p><p>in a certain action).</p><p>2. Based on reflection while probing and afterward, the player must</p><p>form a hypothesis about what something (a text, object, artifact, event,</p><p>or action) might mean in a usefully situated way.</p><p>3. The player reprobes the world with that hypothesis in mind, seeing</p><p>what effect he or she gets.</p><p>4. The player treats this effect as feedback from the world and accepts</p><p>or rethinks his or her original hypothesis.</p><p>In fact, if you don’t engage in this four-step process, you won’t get very</p><p>far in a good video game. For example, in a good but rather standard shooter</p><p>game (like, say, Return to Castle Wolfenstein), you can run around shooting at</p><p>things a bit without engaging in this process, but soon you will run out of</p><p>ammo and health and die, probably in the wrong place, all too close to where</p><p>you started. In a good video game you have to try lots of different things and</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 90</p><p>91v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>then you have to think about the results you get, try to make sense of what</p><p>they mean for you and your progress through the virtual world of the game.</p><p>In fact, you can’t get very far in any real-world practice either if you don’t en-</p><p>gage in this four-step process (say, in being a good teacher, musician, artist,</p><p>architect, businessperson, or athlete).</p><p>Some consider this four-step process to be the basis of expert reflective</p><p>practice in any complex semiotic domain. But it is also how children learn,</p><p>even very young children, when they are not learning in school. It is how</p><p>children initially build their minds and learn their cultures as they develop</p><p>early in life. In other words, this four-step process is central to how humans,</p><p>as biological creatures of a certain sort, learn things when learning is essential</p><p>for survival and for thriving in the world.</p><p>The human mind is a powerful pattern recognizer. In fact, humans are</p><p>quite adept at finding complex patterns where none actually exists (witness</p><p>astrology), a problem I will deal with in the next chapter. The young child</p><p>does something (this is the probe); for example, he or she tries to crush a</p><p>soft cloth book lying on the floor. The child, usually unconsciously, re-</p><p>flects on what he or she is doing while acting (“reflection-in-action”) and</p><p>after having acted (“reflection-on-action”). Such reflection involves listen-</p><p>ing to the world as it “talks back” to your action, giving you feedback</p><p>about the success or failure of that action in terms of your own goals and</p><p>desires.</p><p>Based on this feedback, the child forms a hypothesis (a guess) about a</p><p>pattern that may exist (a set of relationships), say: “Books are soft, they</p><p>squish, but don’t break.” His or her next action (the reprobe) is treated as a</p><p>test of this pattern—do things really work this way or not? Perhaps the child</p><p>now tries to crush a book made of paper laying</p><p>next to the cloth book on the</p><p>floor and finds that it doesn’t squish, but rips and tears. Based on this test, the</p><p>child reflects again in and on action, accepting or re-forming his or her hy-</p><p>pothesis about what the pattern is (say, now, hypothesizing, that cloth books</p><p>squish and paper ones tear).</p><p>The child, through action and reflection, becomes a “self-teacher,”</p><p>“training” his or her own mental networks of associations (the patterns the</p><p>mind stores). Here the network of associations is something like: book—</p><p>cloth—squish; book—paper—tear, a larger pattern made up of two smaller</p><p>subpatterns. Note that the child’s pattern already captures the fact that there</p><p>are two types of book. Indeed, the child may already have another subpattern</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 91</p><p>92 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>for book that is something like: book—cardboard—bends, doesn’t break, ex-</p><p>emplifying yet another category of book.</p><p>As the child forms more associations around the node book (e.g., with</p><p>things like fun, pictures, being read to by his or her parents, etc.), the child</p><p>builds up an interlocking set of patterns (call this all the “book pattern”) and</p><p>subpatterns (elements like book—cloth—squish, or book—parent—being</p><p>read to—feeling loved). Of course, subpatterns in the book pattern are also</p><p>subpatterns in other larger patterns to which they are linked. For example,</p><p>the subpattern book—cloth—squish is also a subpattern in the larger “squish</p><p>pattern” (the pattern that captures how squishiness works in the world).</p><p>This forming of associations is crucial not just to the development of the</p><p>child’s mind. It also constitutes aspects of the child’s emerging identity as a</p><p>cultured being of a certain sort connected to a certain sort of family, social</p><p>group, and community. For example, the six-year-old playing Pikmin in</p><p>chapter 2, when he was two, took his first hike in a forest. He saw a chipmunk</p><p>on a fallen tree and said “Henry’s forest,” referring to a chipmunk in a</p><p>Thomas the Tank Engine book he had at home, a book devoted to an animated</p><p>railroad engine named Henry who is helping to reforest an area after it has</p><p>burned in a forest fire.</p><p>What is happening here is that, as part and parcel of his embodied expe-</p><p>rience in the world, this child is creating a link (association) in his mental</p><p>networks (patterns) between “real” chipmunks and “book” chipmunks, be-</p><p>tween the real world and the world of books. If such episodes continue (and</p><p>they did, of course), the real world and books become integrally linked into</p><p>the same sets of associations or patterns for such a child. Books and the real</p><p>world don’t stand apart or opposed.</p><p>Since the initial patterns we form in life are a basis on which we form all</p><p>the rest of our later patterns (because they determine the hypotheses we orig-</p><p>inally make and revise, setting a certain trajectory to our mental develop-</p><p>ment), children like this have links between the real world and books as a</p><p>foundational part of who they are in mind, body, and culture. It is not sur-</p><p>prising that they often orient to books and literacy when they go to school in</p><p>powerfully different ways from children who have formed quite different pat-</p><p>terns of association and built their viewpoints on the world on that basis.</p><p>Of course, there is no simple deterministic story to be told here. People</p><p>can transform their mental associations when sufficiently powerful learning</p><p>experiences encourage them to do so. What I am referring to here is a certain</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 92</p><p>93v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>“set” or “direction” given to a child’s cognitive, social, and cultural develop-</p><p>ment. Nonetheless, for some children, who have failed to interlink literacy</p><p>into their embodied experiences of the world and their social groups, power-</p><p>ful learning experiences may be required in school to set some new directions</p><p>in respect to literacy. Unfortunately, such children are often the ones who get</p><p>literacy in school completely detached from anything otherwise meaningful</p><p>to them, as they are skilled-and-drilled to death on things like phonics.</p><p>As children build up their concepts—like their concept of book—as a set</p><p>of complexly interlinked patterns and subpatterns, they use these patterns to</p><p>situate meanings that are appropriate to specific situations. They pull out the</p><p>subpatterns that are appropriate (useful) for the situation they are in, adapt-</p><p>ing them to the current situation. If no such subpattern exists already, they</p><p>cobble together a new subpattern from bits and pieces of existing ones and</p><p>adapt this to the current situation.</p><p>For example, if a child wants something hard and flat to draw or color</p><p>on, he or she will situate a meaning for book something like hard flat surface</p><p>good for supporting a piece of paper, drawing on a pattern like “book—paper</p><p>pages—hard covers—covers won’t bend,” and others, and adapting them to</p><p>the current need. Of course, such adaptations, based on experiences in the</p><p>world, in turn form new subpatterns in the child’s mind. Our experiences in</p><p>the world build patterns in our mind, and then the mind shapes our experi-</p><p>ence of the world (and the actions we take in it), which, in turn, reshapes our</p><p>mind. Concepts are never set and finished. They are like a large tree that al-</p><p>ways seeks to rise higher (i.e., attain more generality) but that must always</p><p>send into the ground deeper roots (i.e., return to embodied experience).</p><p>This view of the mind, as I pointed out earlier, is quite different from the</p><p>traditional one in psychology. In the traditional view, concepts are like gen-</p><p>eral definitions in the mind (like definitions for words in dictionaries). In the</p><p>traditional view, the mind thinks through stored “facts” and grand general-</p><p>izations that are like statements in logic (like “All books have covers”). In the</p><p>view I am developing here, the mind thinks and acts on the basis of some-</p><p>thing like stored images (simulations) of experience, images that are com-</p><p>plexly interlinked with each other (thereby attaining some generality) but</p><p>that are always adapted to new experiences in ways that keep them tied to the</p><p>ground of embodied experience and action in the world.</p><p>These two viewpoints on the mind have different consequences for how</p><p>people think schools should operate. If you believe the traditional view, you</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 93</p><p>94 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>think schools should teach children to memorize facts and should overtly tell</p><p>them important generalizations. If you believe the other view, you think</p><p>schools must give children embodied experiences in and through which they</p><p>can form networks of associations that must continually be rechecked against</p><p>the world. Of course, as I show in the next chapter, in this view, children still</p><p>need active teachers who are guiding the hypotheses they make and the pat-</p><p>terns they form from their embodied experience. Otherwise children, ever</p><p>creative beings, may very well hit on wonderful patterns that, in the end,</p><p>don’t work in the semiotic domains to which they are exposed in school.</p><p>The four-stage probe/hypothesize/reprobe/rethink process that under-</p><p>lies the formation of the child’s mind is not different in kind from the process</p><p>by which expert practitioners operate. This four-stage process is, of course,</p><p>basic to good science, whether carried out by children in a good science</p><p>classrooms or “real” scientists in a lab, since science is one important form of</p><p>expert practice. Ironically, though, the process that is basic to young chil-</p><p>dren’s learning and to adult’s expert practice is usually discounted and unused</p><p>in school learning.</p><p>For example, it is currently fashionable, in some circles, to teach young</p><p>children to decode print via scripted direct instruction (so-called DI). This is a</p><p>return to a pedagogy that was popular in the 1960s. In this sort of instruction,</p><p>the teacher reads a written script and overtly tells children what they need to</p><p>know about decoding. The children</p><p>repeat the script over and over, drilling</p><p>on phonics. Though it may not sound like it, this sort of thing can be done</p><p>with enthusiasm, and children can learn to decode this way. There are now</p><p>even calls for such scripted direct instruction in areas like science and math.</p><p>The problem is this: Children in these sorts of pedagogies are not learn-</p><p>ing to discover and test patterns for themselves (which still, of course, re-</p><p>quires the guidance of a good teacher). They are learning to store discrete</p><p>facts and elements of knowledge, not deeper patterns. If all people have in</p><p>their minds is a list of facts, then, when they are faced with a new situation,</p><p>and nothing on the list applies, they must simply memorize another fact.</p><p>This fact, in turn, will apply, like all the others they have stored, only to situ-</p><p>ations just like the one that triggered it in the first place. If people have a pat-</p><p>tern in their mind, however, when they are faced with a new situation, they</p><p>can reflect on how this pattern can be revised to cover the new situation.</p><p>Now they have a new and more powerful pattern in mind, one that might ac-</p><p>tually cover novel situations the person has not yet encountered.</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 94</p><p>95v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>Let me give an example of this contrast between a list and a pattern,</p><p>though the discussion of a child building up the concept of a book already</p><p>makes much the same point. Say you knew that a bedroom could contain the</p><p>following things: a bed, lamps, tables, a chest of drawers, a carpet, and pic-</p><p>tures. What you have is a list. Now, say you see or hear about a bedroom used</p><p>by a college student with a hot plate and small refrigerator in it (perhaps it’s a</p><p>room in a large house rented by a group of students). If all you have is a list,</p><p>you just add this to the list: bedrooms can also have hot plates and small re-</p><p>frigerators in them. There is no real need to think about the matter, since</p><p>lists are, in any case, indefinitely extendable.</p><p>But, now, say that you start not with a list but with a pattern, a visual pic-</p><p>ture of a typical bedroom. Patterns in the mind are not actually pictures, of</p><p>course. They are systems of neural elements standing for things like beds,</p><p>carpets, lamps, and the like, systems that are associated with each other</p><p>through stronger or weaker links in terms of which each system (e.g., the one</p><p>standing for beds) more or less strongly activates the others (e.g., the systems</p><p>standing for chests of drawers and night tables). But mental patterns operate,</p><p>for our purposes, enough like pictures to make the point.</p><p>To make our mental pictures a bit more like neural patterns in the mind,</p><p>let’s imagine that elements in the picture can be more or less clearly focused</p><p>depending on how strongly or weakly they are associated with the main items</p><p>in the picture. So we could imagine that in the typical bedroom picture, the</p><p>bed is in clear and sharp focus, but there is a rather less well focused plant in</p><p>the room, thereby noting that plants are less strongly associated with typical</p><p>bedrooms than are beds. Perhaps, in your picture, a television is somewhere</p><p>in between in focus between the bed (very clearly focused) and the plant (not</p><p>so clearly focused).</p><p>If you have such a picture in mind when you see the college student’s bed-</p><p>room with a hot plate and small refrigerator in it, you have to revise your picture.</p><p>Perhaps you change your original picture to be one not of a typical bedroom but</p><p>the bedroom of a working adult. This amounts to associating “working adult”</p><p>with the other elements in your picture. Note, too, that this picture is not, like a</p><p>list, indefinitely extendable—it now can’t have a hot plate and small refrigerator</p><p>in it. Further, you create a new picture of a typical bedroom of a college student,</p><p>a picture that does have a hot plate and refrigerator in it.</p><p>If later you come across a similar bedroom, another one with a hot plate</p><p>and refrigerator, but now one used by a working adult, you will find that your</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 95</p><p>96 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>college student bedroom picture, by and large, fits. You need revise it only a</p><p>bit to be the picture of a financially strapped person, rather than just a college</p><p>student. You will then also revise your picture of the typical bedroom of a</p><p>working adult to be the picture of the typical bedroom of a middle-class-</p><p>working adult. You might even reflect on the fact that college students often</p><p>live like financially strapped persons even when they come from well-off</p><p>homes, a reflection that can lead to further mediation on the ways in which</p><p>class, age, and institutions interact in our society. Patterns prepare you for fu-</p><p>ture learning in a way that lists don’t.</p><p>What’s really happening here is that you are creating pictures (patterns),</p><p>subdividing them, and adding and subtracting things from them (and refo-</p><p>cusing items) as you confront new situations. You are, in reality, learning how</p><p>to situate the meaning of the word or concept “bedroom” to fit different situ-</p><p>ations, including situations you may not have seen before. Lists require no</p><p>such thinking and learning. Patterns are experiential theories (here a theory of</p><p>bedrooms) that we change with more experience, more probing and reprob-</p><p>ing of the world. Lists are just get bigger with time, taking more effort to re-</p><p>member, and making less and less real sense at any deep explanatory level.</p><p>APPRECIATIVE SYSTEMS</p><p>So far I have argued that the probe/hypothesize/reprobe/rethink cycle is typ-</p><p>ical of how both young children and professional practitioners learn and</p><p>think, though not necessarily how students learn and think in schools. But</p><p>what differentiates the young child learning from the expert practitioner</p><p>learning? What differentiates them, I believe, is the way what I call their ap-</p><p>preciative systems work.</p><p>When the child acts and reflects, probes the world and gets a result, on</p><p>what basis does the child determine the “significance” and the “acceptability”</p><p>of the result? The very form of this question makes it clear that children must</p><p>evaluate the answer coming back from the world, must determine whether</p><p>they “like” it or not, whether it is “good” or not from their perspective. Oth-</p><p>erwise, why use the answer in their reflections and subsequent interactions</p><p>with the world and, indeed, in their own minds as they build up their mental</p><p>networks of associations?</p><p>Children can determine what they “like,” what is a “good” result, only in</p><p>terms of an appreciative system, that is, their set of goals, desires, feelings, and</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 96</p><p>97v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>values in respect to the domain being engaged with. The appreciative system</p><p>is where affect and cognition merge and come together. The children revise</p><p>the hypotheses they have formed based on the goals, desires, feelings, and</p><p>values encapsulated in their appreciative system. Young children who are</p><p>thrilled by their power to destroy things will evaluate the tear of the brittle</p><p>page of a book as a good result and seek other brittle things to tear.</p><p>Expert practitioners in a given semiotic domain—whether teaching, sci-</p><p>ence, law, business, architecture, art, or what have you—have to form an ap-</p><p>preciative system relevant to that domain in terms of which they can evaluate</p><p>action (probes) in the domain. That is, they must form the sorts of goals, de-</p><p>sires, feelings, and values that “insiders” in that domain recognize as the sorts</p><p>members of that domain (the affinity group associated with that domain) typ-</p><p>ically have. This process is much more specialized than the everyday learning</p><p>a small child does. Furthermore, if learning in the domain is to be active and</p><p>critical, the learning process and the appreciative system to which it gives rise</p><p>must be open to a good deal more conscious reflection and critique than is typ-</p><p>ical of small children mastering their early worlds.</p><p>This is not to say that individuals do not</p><p>merge and color these “social”</p><p>goals, desires, feelings, and values (stemming from the affinity group associ-</p><p>ated with the semiotic domain) with their own personal idiosyncratic goals,</p><p>desires, feelings, and values. They most certainly do. They also merge and</p><p>color them with those connected to other semiotic domains of which they are</p><p>members and other identities, including cultural identities that they have in</p><p>the real world. The appreciative system, then, is the place where not only the</p><p>affective and cognitive merge and come together, it is the place where the so-</p><p>cial, cultural, and the personal merge and come together as well.</p><p>Nonetheless, the affinity group connected to the semiotic domain being</p><p>learned norms and disciplines what counts as an “acceptable” and “recogniz-</p><p>able” and “competent” appreciative system in the domain and what does not.</p><p>The newcomer learns what counts as competent goals, desires, feelings, and</p><p>values in the domain in terms of which he or she can properly evaluate the</p><p>results of his or her probes within the world of the domain. In a sense, the</p><p>learner is forming what we might call “taste” in the domain.</p><p>In any domain—whether playing video games or learning some branch</p><p>of science—the learner can learn in such a way that no real appreciative sys-</p><p>tem is operative. In this case, the learner just does what he or she is told in a</p><p>rote way. On the other hand, the learner can be actively enough involved in</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 97</p><p>98 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>learning the domain to form an appreciative system that norms and guides</p><p>his or her thought and action in the domain, but this system can remain</p><p>largely unconscious and not reflected on in any very overt way. This is active</p><p>but not yet critical learning.</p><p>In critical learning, the learner comes not just to form an appreciative</p><p>system through practice and interaction with the affinity group associated</p><p>with the domain but to reflect overtly on the goals, values, feelings, and de-</p><p>sires that compose this system, to compare and contrast this appreciative sys-</p><p>tem to others, and to make active and critical choices about the system. Of</p><p>course, these choices must either remain within the confines of what the</p><p>affinity group associated with the domain will recognize as acceptable or</p><p>transform what the group finds acceptable. In either case, the learner is tak-</p><p>ing on a projective identity—actively, reflectively, and critically interfacing, at</p><p>a metalevel, his or her real-world identities with the new identity being</p><p>formed in the new semiotic domain.</p><p>When a player plays a video game like Deus Ex actively and critically, the</p><p>player forms a viewpoint on what counts as playing well or not. It is not just a</p><p>matter of getting through a crisis or solving a problem, of just surviving to</p><p>get to the end of the game. The player cares about how his or her character</p><p>(his or her virtual self) has fared. As I played more and more of Deus Ex and</p><p>got better at the game, I found myself repeatedly playing scenes to do them</p><p>better—to have my character look better and to be able myself to look back</p><p>on the history of that character’s interaction in the virtual world with a cer-</p><p>tain pride (pride that I could feel both in terms of my virtual identity as the</p><p>character and my real identity as a player).</p><p>I was forming an appreciative system, one on which I could overtly re-</p><p>flect if and when I wished to. When I did engage in such overt reflection, ask-</p><p>ing myself why I cared about this or that outcome and what exactly my values</p><p>in the game world were, I learned a good deal about myself, about the virtual</p><p>world of the game, and about the design of this and other related games.</p><p>People do not usually form appreciative systems by themselves. Even in</p><p>my case, where I was playing alone and not in a multiplayer game, I formed</p><p>my appreciative system through multiple routes that went beyond my private</p><p>play. As I got into the game (one of the first I played), I read about it on a va-</p><p>riety of Internet sites. I looked at chat room sites devoted to the game and</p><p>saw how others talked and felt about playing it and games like it. I eventually</p><p>read magazines devoted to video games as well. I consulted several different</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 98</p><p>99v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>walkthroughs of the game, intrigued both by how the writers had played</p><p>through a given part and how they talked about such play.</p><p>And, of course, players who play with others, often on teams against</p><p>other teams, and often getting on chat rooms to talk about their play, have</p><p>their appreciative systems formed even more directly by the affinity group</p><p>associated with the game. My appreciative system in regard to games like</p><p>Deus Ex has changed and, I think, deepened as I have played more such</p><p>games and had more interactions with the affinity group associated with such</p><p>games via the Internet, magazines, books, and face-to-face verbal interaction</p><p>(e.g., I learned a good deal when I talked about and played the Xbox shooter</p><p>Halo with a young lawyer, a member of a generation that grown up playing</p><p>video games).</p><p>When players not only form but overtly reflect on their emerging and</p><p>ever-changing appreciative systems, they gain insight into and opinions</p><p>about the design of the genres of video games in regard to which they have</p><p>formed appreciative systems. It is not uncommon for players to voice these</p><p>opinions in reviews and in comments on Internet sites devoted to games. In-</p><p>deed, some players use software that often comes with a game to build their</p><p>own new extensions to the game or whole new games.</p><p>As I play shooter games now—games like Max Payne, Red Faction, Halo,</p><p>Return to Castle Wolfenstein—I find myself comparing and contrasting them. I</p><p>find myself, however silently, critiquing elements of the game as “nothing</p><p>new,” “nice touch,” “a nostalgic nod to Half-Life” (an earlier, vastly popular</p><p>shooter), “brilliant integration of graphics and action,” “problem well-inte-</p><p>grated into the plot line, not just a puzzle,” and a great many more (some ex-</p><p>pressed in language not printable here—especially in regard to the jumping</p><p>in Half-Life). My appreciative system is tied in an important way to knowl-</p><p>edge about and perspectives on shooter games as designed entities having their</p><p>own sort of “design grammar.” It is a “language” I am beginning to think and</p><p>speak, even to think and speak creatively in the sense that I can critique such</p><p>games and imagine new and different ones. In the end, then, while I don’t</p><p>have the skills to build a game, I think a good deal, while playing (reflection</p><p>in action) and afterward (reflection on action), about what new and better</p><p>games “ought to” look like.</p><p>It is my contention that active, critical learning in any domain should</p><p>lead to learners becoming, in a sense, designers. Some, like the players who</p><p>build their own extensions to games, will actually design new things. Others,</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 99</p><p>100 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>like me, will design in thought and talk and let it inform their play. But there</p><p>is no design and designing, in the sense I am talking about, without forming</p><p>an appreciative system for a given semiotic domain. And no appreciative sys-</p><p>tem is formed without probing, hypothesizing, reprobing, and rethinking</p><p>through embodied action in a domain in connection with the affinity group</p><p>associated with the domain.</p><p>I have said enough already, in this respect, about schools. But let me note</p><p>that talk about appreciative systems, design and designing, and reflection in</p><p>and on embodied action in association with an affinity group are matters that</p><p>hardly ever appear in discussions about school or in educational research.</p><p>Perhaps that’s one reason why so many young people learn to play complex</p><p>video games so much faster and better than they learn anything comparably</p><p>complex is school.</p><p>WRITTEN TEXTS</p><p>With all my talk of situated and embodied meanings, probing the world, and</p><p>designing</p><p>things, some will ask what has happened to good old-fashioned</p><p>printed texts. Video games have, I believe, a great deal to teach us about how</p><p>reading printed texts actually works when people understand—again, in situ-</p><p>ated, embodied, active, and critical ways—what they read.</p><p>A game like Deus Ex has a great many texts inside the virtual world it cre-</p><p>ates, texts you find along the way, like notes, e-mail, diaries, and messages</p><p>you have hacked from various computers. These texts help you not only to</p><p>piece together the ongoing story but to make decisions about actions you will</p><p>or will not take. In some games, such as Clive Barker’s Undying, the number of</p><p>extended texts you find gets quite large and is a central part of playing (and</p><p>enjoying) the game.</p><p>However, video games are deeply connected to written texts in a different</p><p>way as well. They are surrounded by a great many different types of written</p><p>texts. For instance, there are a large number of reviews of games in magazines</p><p>and on Internet sites. Furthermore, players often can and do add their own re-</p><p>views to the official review written for a particular Internet site (and players</p><p>appear to show no deference whatsoever to the official reviewers).</p><p>Games come with manuals (often, but not always, fairly small—the one</p><p>for Deus Ex is 20 pages). They also often come with a booklet, written as a</p><p>diary, or notes, or otherwise set as part of the virtual world of the game, that</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 100</p><p>101v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>give the back story or background information for that virtual world. For ex-</p><p>ample, American McGee’s Alice, a game where Alice has gone insane and re-</p><p>turned to a nightmarish Wonderland, comes with a booklet entitled</p><p>“Rutledge Private Clinic and Asylum Casebook,” which contains Alice’s</p><p>physician’s daily notes on her treatment.</p><p>For many games, publishers offer highly colorful and detailed strategy</p><p>guides that tell players all about the game (its characters, maps and geography</p><p>of the world, weapons, enemies, objects to be found, fruitful strategies to fol-</p><p>low, etc.). Such guides also give a complete walkthrough for the game. A num-</p><p>ber of Internet sites offer (usually free) a variety of different walkthroughs</p><p>written by players themselves. These sites also offer hints from players and</p><p>“cheats” for the games. (Cheats are ways to manipulate the game’s program-</p><p>ming to do things like give yourself extra life or more ammunition.)</p><p>These texts are all integrated into the appreciative systems associated</p><p>with the affinity groups connected to video games. Different players and</p><p>groups have different views about whether, when, and how to use these texts.</p><p>For example, consider walkthroughs. These documents often run to 70 or</p><p>more single-spaced pages and are written according to a tight set of rules</p><p>about what they should contain and look like (including a list of each date on</p><p>which the walkthrough was revised). Some players shun walkthroughs en-</p><p>tirely, though they may write them. Others argue that walkthroughs can and</p><p>should be used, but only to get a hint when one is thoroughly stuck. Indeed,</p><p>the writers of the walkthroughs themselves often recommend that players use</p><p>them this way. (Imagine producing a 70-page, single-spaced document and</p><p>advising people to look at it only when and where they are stuck.)</p><p>Of course, if children had walkthroughs in school when they studied</p><p>things like science, we would call it “cheating” (let alone if they had “cheat</p><p>codes”). But, then, imagine what a science classroom would look like where</p><p>learners wrote extensive walkthroughs according to strict norms and debated</p><p>when and how to use them, debates that became part and parcel of the learn-</p><p>ers’ growing appreciative systems about what it means to “do science (well).”</p><p>And, indeed, in a sense, real scientists do have walkthroughs. They know</p><p>(through talk with others and through texts) the case histories of how rele-</p><p>vant related discoveries in their field were made. They also have opinions</p><p>about how closely one should consult or follow these histories.</p><p>It is now a piece of folk wisdom that “young people” don’t read things</p><p>like manuals but just start playing games. To the extent that this is true, it is</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 101</p><p>102 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>partly because, I explain in the next chapter, video games are so good at</p><p>teaching people to play them by actually starting to play them. Yet I would</p><p>argue that these young people are reading and using print in the way it is and</p><p>should be used when people actually understand what they read in a useful</p><p>and situated way. Baby boomers—perhaps too influenced by traditional</p><p>schooling—often try to do otherwise to their regret and frustration, when</p><p>they insist on reading a manual before they have any embodied understand-</p><p>ing of what the manual is about.</p><p>Very often players quickly look over the instruction booklet that comes</p><p>with a new game before starting to play. Experienced players often can tell at</p><p>a glance how the controls will work and anything special they may need to</p><p>pay attention to as they start to learn to play the game by actually starting to</p><p>play it (or doing the game’s on-disk training, if it has one). If the game is a</p><p>new genre for them, they may have to pay a bit more attention. But, in any</p><p>case, the problem with the texts associated with video game—the instruction</p><p>booklets, walkthroughs, and strategy guides—is that they do not make a lot</p><p>of sense unless one has already experienced and lived in the game world for a</p><p>while. Of course, this lack of lucidity can be made up for if the player has read</p><p>similar texts before, but at some point these texts originally made sense be-</p><p>cause the player had an embodied world of experience in terms of which to</p><p>situate and spell out their meanings.</p><p>The same thing is most certainly true of the sorts of texts that show up in</p><p>learning content areas like science and math in school, especially in the later</p><p>grades, high school, and college. A biology textbook does not make a lot of</p><p>sense unless and until one has experienced and lived in the world of biology</p><p>as practice for a while. And again, this lack of lucidity is mitigated if the stu-</p><p>dent has already read a good many similar texts. However, at some point</p><p>these texts also originally made sense because the student had an embodied</p><p>world of experience (in reality or, at least, simulated in his or her mind) in</p><p>terms of which to situate and spell out their meanings.</p><p>When I give talks on video games to teachers, I often show them a man-</p><p>ual or strategy guide and ask them how much they understand. Very often</p><p>they are frustrated. They have no experience in which to situate the words</p><p>and phrases of the texts. All they get is verbal information, which they under-</p><p>stand at some literal level, but which does not really hang together. They</p><p>cannot visualize this verbal information in any way that makes sense or makes</p><p>them want to read on. I tell them that that is how their students often feel</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 102</p><p>103v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>when confronted with a text or textbook in science or some other academic</p><p>area if they have had no experiences in terms of which they can situate the</p><p>meanings of the words and phrases. It’s all “just words,” words the “good”</p><p>students can repeat on tests and the “bad” ones can’t.</p><p>When you have played a video game for a while, something magical hap-</p><p>pens to the texts associated with it. All of sudden they seem lucid and clear</p><p>and readable. You can’t even recall how confusing they seemed in the first</p><p>place. At that point, players can use the text in a great variety of ways for dif-</p><p>ferent purposes. For instance, they can look up details that enhance their</p><p>play. (I recently looked up information on the different guns in Return to Cas-</p><p>tle Wolfenstein and discovered I was using a less accurate one than I could have</p><p>been using, and I also got a crucial hint on how to keep the better gun from</p><p>overheating.)</p><p>Or they can fill out their knowledge of the places, creatures,</p><p>and things in the virtual world in which they are living. They can trou-</p><p>bleshoot problems they are having in the game, with the game, or with their</p><p>computer. They can get hints or compare their play to how others have done.</p><p>Let me take the booklet that comes with Deus Ex as an example of what I</p><p>mean by saying that texts associated with video games are not lucid unless</p><p>and until one has some embodied game experience in which to “cash out” the</p><p>meanings of the text. The book contains 20 small pages, printed in double</p><p>columns on each page. In these pages, there are 199 bolded references that</p><p>represent headings and subheadings. One small randomly chosen stretch of</p><p>headings and subheadings that appears at the end of page 5 and the begin-</p><p>ning of page 6 says: Passive Readouts, Damage Monitor, Active Augmentation &</p><p>Device Icons, Items-at-Hand, Information Screens, Note, Inventory, Inventory</p><p>Management, Stacks, Nanokey ring, Ammunition. Each of these 199 headings</p><p>and subheadings is followed by text that gives information relevant to the</p><p>topic and relates it to other information throughout the booklet. In addition,</p><p>the booklet assigns 53 keys on the computer keyboard to some function in</p><p>the game, and these 53 keys are mentioned 82 times in relation to the infor-</p><p>mation contained in the 199 headings and subheadings. So, although small,</p><p>the booklet is packed with relatively technical information.</p><p>Here is a typical piece of language from this booklet:</p><p>Your internal nano-processors keep a very detailed record of your condition,</p><p>equipment and recent history. You can access this data at any time during</p><p>play by hitting F1 to get to the Inventory screen or F2 to get to the</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 103</p><p>104 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>Goals/Notes screen. Once you have accessed your information screens, you</p><p>can move between the screens by clicking on the tabs at the top of the</p><p>screen. You can map other information screens to hotkeys using Settings,</p><p>Keyboard/Mouse.</p><p>This makes perfect sense at a literal level, but that just goes to show how</p><p>worthless the literal level is. When you understand this sort of passage at only a</p><p>literal level, you have only an illusion of understanding, one that quickly disap-</p><p>pears as you try to relate this information to the hundreds of other important</p><p>details in the booklet. First of all, this passage means nothing real to you if you</p><p>have no situated idea about what “nano-processors,” “condition,” “equip-</p><p>ment,” “history,” “F1,” “Inventory screen,” “F2,” “Goals/Notes screen” (and,</p><p>of course, “Goals” and “Notes”), “information screens,” “clicking,” “tabs,”</p><p>“map,” “hotkeys,” and “Settings, Keyboard/Mouse” mean in and for playing</p><p>games like Deus Ex.</p><p>Second, though you know literally what each sentence means, together</p><p>they raise a plethora of questions if you have no situated understandings of</p><p>this game or games like it. For instance: Is the same data (condition, equip-</p><p>ment, and history) on both the Inventory screen and the Goals/Notes</p><p>screen? If so, why is it on two different screens? If not, which type of infor-</p><p>mation is on which screen and why? The fact that I can move between the</p><p>screens by clicking on the tabs (but what do these tabs look like; will I recog-</p><p>nize them?) suggests that some of this information is on one screen and some</p><p>on the other. But, then, is my “condition” part of my Inventory or my</p><p>Goals/Notes—it doesn’t seem to be either, but, then, what is my “condition”</p><p>anyway? If I can map other information screens (and what are these?) to</p><p>hotkeys using “Setting, Keyboard/Mouse,” does this mean there is no other</p><p>way to access them? How will I access them in the first place to assign them</p><p>to my own chosen hotkeys? Can I click between them and the Inventory</p><p>screen and the Goals/Notes screens by pressing on “tabs”? And so on—20</p><p>pages is beginning to seem like a lot; remember, there are 199 different head-</p><p>ings under which information like this is given.</p><p>Of course, all these terms and questions can be defined and answered if</p><p>you closely check and cross-check information over and over again through</p><p>the little booklet. You can constantly turn the pages backward and forward.</p><p>But once you have one set of links relating various items and actions in mind,</p><p>another drops out just as you need it and you’re back to turning pages. Is the</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 104</p><p>105v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>booklet poorly written? Not at all. It is written just as well or as poorly as—</p><p>just like, in fact—any of a myriad of school-based texts in the content areas. It</p><p>is, outside the practices in the semiotic domain from which it comes, just as</p><p>meaningless, however much one could garner literal meanings from it with</p><p>which to verbally repeat things or pass tests.</p><p>Of course, you can say, “Oh, yeah, you click on F1 to get to the Inven-</p><p>tory screen and F2 to get to the Goals/Notes screen” and sound like you</p><p>know something. The trouble is this: In the actual game, you can click on F2</p><p>and meditate on the screen you see at your leisure. Nothing bad will happen</p><p>to you. However, very often you have to click on F1 and do something</p><p>quickly in the midst of a heated battle. There’s no “at your leisure” here. The</p><p>two commands really don’t function the same way in the game—they actually</p><p>mean different things in terms of embodied and situated action—and they</p><p>never really just mean “click F1, get screen.” That’s their general meaning,</p><p>the one with which you really can’t do anything useful until you know how to</p><p>spell it out further in situation-specific terms in the game.</p><p>When you can spell out such information in situation-specific terms in the</p><p>game, then the relationships of this information to the other hundreds of pieces</p><p>of information in the booklet become clear and meaningful. And, of course, it is</p><p>these relationships that are what really count if you are to understand the game</p><p>as a system and, thus, play it at all well. Now you can read the book if you need to</p><p>to piece in missing bits of information, check on your understandings, or solve a</p><p>particular problem or answer a particular question you have.</p><p>When I first read this booklet before playing Deus Ex (and having played</p><p>only one other shooter game, a very different one), I was sorely tempted to put</p><p>the game on a shelf and forget about it. I was simply overwhelmed with details,</p><p>questions, and confusions. When I started the game, I kept trying to look up</p><p>stuff. But I understood none of it well enough to find things easily without</p><p>searching for the same information over and over again. In the end, you have</p><p>to just actively play the game and explore and try everything. Then, at last, the</p><p>booklet makes good sense, but by then you don’t need it all that much.</p><p>There is much discussion these days about how many children fail in</p><p>school—especially children from poor homes—because they have not been</p><p>taught phonics well or correctly in their early years. But the truth of the matter</p><p>is that a great many more children fail in school because, while they can decode</p><p>print, they cannot handle the progressively more complex demands school lan-</p><p>guage makes on them as they move up in the grades and on to high school.</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 105</p><p>106 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>School requires, in respect to both oral and written language, forms or</p><p>styles of language that are different from and, in some respects, more com-</p><p>plex than everyday oral language used in informal face-to-face conversations.</p><p>The forms of language used in texts and discussions in science, math, social</p><p>studies classes, and other content areas, go by the general name of “academic</p><p>language,” though different varieties of academic language are associated</p><p>with different content areas in school.</p><p>Academic language, like the language in the Deus Ex booklet, is not re-</p><p>ally lucid or meaningful if one has no embodied experiences within which to</p><p>situate its meanings in specific</p><p>ways. For example, consider this academic-</p><p>language quote from a high school science textbook:</p><p>The destruction of a land surface by the combined effects of abrasion and</p><p>removal of weathered material by transporting agents is called erosion. . . .</p><p>The production of rock waste by mechanical processes and chemical</p><p>changes is called weathering.</p><p>Again, one can certainly understand this at some literal word-by-word,</p><p>sentence-by-sentence way. However, this is not “everyday” language. No one</p><p>speaks this way at home around the table or at a bar having drinks with</p><p>friends. But this language is filled with all the same problems the language of</p><p>the Deus Ex booklet was for me when I had not lived through any experiences</p><p>in terms of which I could situate its meanings. Without embodied experi-</p><p>ences with which to cash out its meanings, all the above academic text will</p><p>do—as the Deus Ex booklet did to me initially—is fill one with questions,</p><p>confusion, and, perhaps, anger.</p><p>For example: I have no idea what the difference is between “abrasion”</p><p>and “removal of weathered material by transporting agents,” which I would</p><p>have thought was one form of abrasion. What’s a “transporting agent”?</p><p>What’s a “mechanical process”? I am not really clear on the difference be-</p><p>tween “mechanical processes,” especially in regard to weather, and “chemical</p><p>changes.” And what chemicals are we talking about here—stuff in rain?</p><p>Since the first sentence is about “erosion” and the second about “weath-</p><p>ering,” I suppose these two things are connected in some important way—</p><p>but how? They must be two forms of “destruction of a land surface,” given</p><p>that this is the subject of the first sentence. But, then, I would have thought</p><p>that producing “rock waste” was a way of building, not just destroying, land,</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 106</p><p>107v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>since rock waste eventually turns into dirt (doesn’t it?) and thus, I would have</p><p>supposed, eventually into potentially fertile land. But this is a geology text,</p><p>and they don’t care about fertile land (or do they?). The word “land” here has</p><p>a different range of possible situated meanings than I am familiar with.</p><p>Of course, I can turn the pages of the book back and forth clarifying all</p><p>these points. After all, these two sentences are meant to be definitions—</p><p>though not of the words “erosion” and “weathering” in everyday terms but in</p><p>specialist terms in a particular semiotic domain.) And, of course, I do need to</p><p>know that they are definitions, and I may not even know that if I have had lit-</p><p>tle experience of specialists trying to define terms in explicit and operational</p><p>ways so as to lessen the sort of ambiguity and vagueness that is more typical</p><p>of everyday talk. Since they are definitions, they are linked and cross-linked</p><p>to a myriad of other terms, descriptions, and explanations throughout the</p><p>book, and I can follow this tangled trail across the pages, back and forth, los-</p><p>ing bits of the connections just as I need them and page turning yet again.</p><p>However, once I have experienced the sorts of embodied images, actions,</p><p>and tasks that engage geologists—including their ways of talking and debating,</p><p>their reasons for doing so, their interests, norms, and values—then the text is</p><p>lucid and useful. Confusion, frustration, and anger disappear. Given such under-</p><p>standing, everybody would pass the test and we couldn’t fail half the class and</p><p>reward a small set of “winners,”—people who can repeat back verbal details they</p><p>remember well when they don’t fully understand them in any practical way.</p><p>MORE LEARNING PRINCIPLES</p><p>Let me conclude this discussion by listing further learning principles that our</p><p>discussion of learning and thinking in video games in this chapter has impli-</p><p>cated. Once again, in this list, I intend each principle to be relevant both to</p><p>learning in video games and learning in content areas in classrooms. After</p><p>listing principles we have already discussed pretty thoroughly, I discuss a few</p><p>others that are related to them.</p><p>15. Probing Principle</p><p>Learning is a cycle of probing the world (doing something); reflect-</p><p>ing in and on this action and, on this basis, forming a hypo-</p><p>thesis; reprobing the world to test this hypothesis; and then accept-</p><p>ing or rethinking the hypothesis.</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 107</p><p>108 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>16. Multiple Routes Principle</p><p>There are multiple ways to make progress or move ahead. This al-</p><p>lows learners to make choices, rely on their own strengths and styles</p><p>of learning and problem solving, while also exploring alternative</p><p>styles.</p><p>17. Situated Meaning Principle</p><p>The meanings of signs (words, actions, objects, artifacts, symbols,</p><p>texts, etc.) are situated in embodied experience. Meanings are not</p><p>general or decontextulized. Whatever generality meanings come to</p><p>have is discovered bottom up via embodied experiences.</p><p>18. Text Principle</p><p>Texts are not understood purely verbally (i.e., only in terms of the</p><p>definitions of the words in the text and their text-internal relation-</p><p>ships to each other) but are understood in terms of embodied experi-</p><p>ences. Learners move back and forth between texts and embodied</p><p>experiences. More purely verbal understanding (reading texts apart</p><p>from embodied action) comes only when learners have had enough</p><p>embodied experience in the domain and ample experiences with sim-</p><p>ilar texts.</p><p>Now let us turn to four related learning principles, which are implicated</p><p>in the discussion of video games and learning in this chapter although they</p><p>were not discussed directly. The Intertextual Principle is concerned with the</p><p>fact that after players have dealt a good bit with a certain type or genre of</p><p>video game and the texts associated with them, they can begin to see these</p><p>texts themselves as a family or genre of related texts. They understand any</p><p>one such text (say a strategy guide for a fantasy role-playing game) intertex-</p><p>tually in relationship to other related texts they have read connected to such</p><p>games. Now they are “cashing out” texts not just in terms of embodied action</p><p>in the games they have played (they are most certainly doing that as well) but</p><p>also in terms of other texts they have read in the family or genre. Reading</p><p>“new” texts becomes easy.</p><p>The Multimodal Principle is concerned with the fact—clear in all of the</p><p>discussion about video games in this book so far—that, in video games, mean-</p><p>ing, thinking, and learning are linked to multiple modalities (words, images,</p><p>actions, sounds, etc.) and not just to words. Sometimes, at a particular point in</p><p>a game, multiple modalities support each other to communicate similar mean-</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 108</p><p>109v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>ings (e.g., “go in this direction”); sometimes they communicate different mean-</p><p>ings, each of which fits together to form a bigger, more meaningful and satisfy-</p><p>ing whole (e.g., “I have just entered an evil place, better be real careful”).</p><p>The “Material Intelligence” Principle is really a subpart of the Multimodal</p><p>Principle. In a video game, objects and artifacts store some of the thinking and</p><p>knowledge a player gains. So, in fact, does the environment the player moves</p><p>through. For example, in Deus Ex if you haven’t got a lock pick, you may have</p><p>to think a great deal to get into a given door. If you have a lock pick, the lock</p><p>pick stores your knowledge of how to get in the door, and you don’t need to</p><p>store the knowledge yourself. You can devote your thinking and problem-solv-</p><p>ing skills to other matters, thereby powerfully extending the amount of overall</p><p>thinking and problem solving that is being accomplished, since the lock pick is</p><p>doing some of it, along with lots of other “potent” material items.</p><p>In video games players soon learn how to “read” the physical environ-</p><p>ments they are in to gain clues about how to proceed through them. The</p><p>shapes and contours of the physical environment, and the objects lying</p><p>around, come to guide the player (of course, one can be fooled from</p><p>time to</p><p>time) in making good guesses about how to proceed. For instance, at one</p><p>point in American McGee’s Alice, you (playing as Alice) are lost among rocks</p><p>and wild streams. However, you can see far off at the top of a mountain a bit</p><p>of a mansion. Furthermore, the environment contains some contours of</p><p>rocks and hills that suggest ways up. And finally, shining on a few rocks ahead</p><p>of you are red jewels that you have already learned give you more health if</p><p>you pick them up. Their placement clearly suggests moving toward them.</p><p>The whole layout of the environment, then, helps you guess intelligently</p><p>about how to proceed.</p><p>It is certainly good you get this help from the material environment and</p><p>objects in it—good that the material environment and objects in it are part of</p><p>your intelligence—because all along the way you have more than enough to do</p><p>thinking about how to fight Wonderland’s now-deranged characters who want</p><p>to stop your progress (and about how to solve a good many other problems).</p><p>Of course, in good science instruction in classrooms, children should</p><p>come to see that, in science, too, objects, artifacts, and the ways in which the</p><p>environment is set up can store knowledge and power. This, in turn, can allow</p><p>them to think about other things and solve other problems that, when com-</p><p>bined with the knowledge and power stored in the material objects and envi-</p><p>ronment, truly extends their reach. Indeed, good teachers set up scientific</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 109</p><p>110 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>environments that guide learners and surround them with empowering ob-</p><p>jects that extend their individual efforts.</p><p>For example, just staring at and playing with pendulums in the real world</p><p>is not actually a good way to “discover” the laws of the pendulum’s move-</p><p>ment. Galileo actually discovered these laws not by staring at a swinging</p><p>chandelier, as the myth has it, but by using geometry and drawing, on paper,</p><p>arcs and circles and paths of movement along them and figuring our their</p><p>geometrical properties. Geometry is a powerful tool that stores much knowl-</p><p>edge and skill that the learner does not have to invent for him- or herself. So,</p><p>too, is the computer program diSessa uses to teach students Galileo’s theo-</p><p>rems about motion. Of course, we often expect children to learn science</p><p>without the tools, artifacts, and material guidance that actual scientists have</p><p>and have gained from the history of their science. There is real intelligence</p><p>built into geometry and diSessa’s Boxer program, as there is “player intelli-</p><p>gence” built into the objects and environments in American McGee’s Alice.</p><p>Finally, the Intuitive (Tacit) Knowledge Principle is concerned with the</p><p>fact that video games honor not just the explicit and verbal knowledge play-</p><p>ers have about how to play but also the intuitive or tacit knowledge—built</p><p>into their movements, bodies, and unconscious ways of thinking—they have</p><p>built up through repeated practice with a family or genre of games. It is com-</p><p>mon today for research on modern workplaces to point out that in today’s</p><p>high-tech and fast-changing world, the most valuable knowledge a business</p><p>has is the tacit knowledge its workers gain through continually working with</p><p>others in a “community of practice” that adapts to specific situations and</p><p>changes “on the ground” as they happen. Such knowledge cannot always be</p><p>verbalized. Even when it can be verbalized and placed in a training manual,</p><p>by that time it is often out of date.</p><p>Of course, conscious knowledge is important for critical learning, as I</p><p>have pointed out several times already. But, too often, unlike video games and</p><p>good workplaces, schools do not honor the tacit and embodied knowledge</p><p>people build up through practice and adaptation to change “on the spot” as it</p><p>happens amid practice (and not in pure speculation). Yet such knowledge is</p><p>crucial in a great many domains and is a large part of why learners feel compe-</p><p>tent in a domain and feel as if they share real membership with the affinity</p><p>group associated with a domain. The child learning science who has built up</p><p>no tacit knowledge—no “craft knowledge”—cannot really feel competent ei-</p><p>ther. But the child who has built up such knowledge is liable to be turned off</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 110</p><p>111v SITUATED MEANING AND LEARNING v</p><p>by school when such knowledge is not valued and mindlessly repeating facts</p><p>and numbers that one understands in no embodied way gains one an A.</p><p>I once helped run an after-school science club for middle-school students</p><p>who were quite unaffiliated with school and school-based learning and literacy.</p><p>We taught these children how to do science and how to talk about what they</p><p>were doing and discovering with each other. We taught them to act and talk</p><p>like knowers, not just passive observers. When we checked up on one of the</p><p>young boys who had flourished in our club (had even won a prize in his school’s</p><p>science fair), his high school teacher told us something quite interesting: “It’s</p><p>funny, he is really good at actually doing the science when we run an experi-</p><p>ment or do other things, but he has a bad grade, because he keeps failing my</p><p>multiple-choice tests.” This teacher did not value how much science this child</p><p>knew in a tacit way tied to practice. He could hardly leverage this knowledge—</p><p>and bring some of it to conscious and critical awareness—if he did not honor it.</p><p>When profit is on the line, good businesses no longer make this mistake.</p><p>Next I list the principles we have just discussed.</p><p>19. Intertextual Principle</p><p>The learner understands texts as a family (“genre”) of related texts</p><p>and understands any one such text in relation to others in the family,</p><p>but only after having achieved embodied understandings of some</p><p>texts. Understanding a group of texts as a family (genre) of texts is a</p><p>large part of what helps the learner make sense of such texts.</p><p>20. Multimodal Principle</p><p>Meaning and knowledge are built up through various modalities (im-</p><p>ages, texts, symbols, interactions, abstract design, sound, etc.), not</p><p>just words.</p><p>21. “Material Intelligence” Principle</p><p>Thinking, problem solving, and knowledge are “stored” in material</p><p>objects and the environment. This frees learners to engage their</p><p>minds with other things while combining the results of their own</p><p>thinking with the knowledge stored in material objects and the envi-</p><p>ronment to achieve yet more powerful effects.</p><p>22. Intuitive Knowledge Principle</p><p>Intuitive or tacit knowledge built up in repeated practice and experi-</p><p>ence, often in association with an affinity group, counts a great deal</p><p>and is honored. Not just verbal and conscious knowledge is rewarded.</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 111</p><p>112 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>BIBL IOGRAPHICAL NOTE</p><p>The discussion in this chapter about thinking as founded in pattern recognition from</p><p>our embodied experiences of the world draws broadly on so-called connectionist</p><p>views of the mind. See P. M. Churchland 1989; P. S. Churchland 1987; P. S. Church-</p><p>land & Sejnowski 1992; Clark 1989, 1993, 1997; Margolis 1987, 1993; Rumelhart,</p><p>McClelland, and the PDP Research Group 1986. For related work that has deeply in-</p><p>fluenced me, see Barsalou 1999a, b; Glenberg 1997; Glenberg & Robertson 1999;</p><p>Hutchins 1995; Nolan 1994. The quote about comprehension being grounded in</p><p>perceptual simulations is from Barsalou 1999, p. 77. The quote about meaning being</p><p>about what a person can do is from Glenberg 1997, p. 3.</p><p>For the idea that abstract notions are rooted in metaphors for embodied experi-</p><p>ence, see Lakoff 1987; Lakoff & Johnson 1980. On situated and embodied meanings,</p><p>see Brooks 2002; Brown, Collins, & Dugid 1989; Clancey 1997; Clark 1997; Gee</p><p>1996, 1999b; Lave 1988; Lave & Wenger 1991; Rogoff 1990; and Tomasello 1999.</p><p>For Galileo’s use of geometry to solve the problem of pendulums and how chil-</p><p>dren are asked to engage in an actually harder task in school when they must solve the</p><p>same problem without geometry, see Edwards & Mercer 1987.</p><p>For diSessa’s work and</p><p>a discussion of Boxer, see diSessa 2000, quotes are from pp. 32–33, 33, 34. The probe,</p><p>hypothesize, reprobe, rethink cycle is deeply related to Donald Schon’s work, see</p><p>Schon 1987; see also Gee 1997. The discussion of “appreciative systems” (a term</p><p>Schon uses) was inspired by Schon’s work. On the idea that learners ought to be de-</p><p>signers, see New London Group 1996. The quote about the destruction of land sur-</p><p>faces is taken from a textbook quoted in Martin 1990.</p><p>Intertextuality is a major theme in Bakhtin’s influential work; see especially</p><p>Bakhtin 1986. Material relevant to the material intelligence principle and the intuitive</p><p>knowledge principle is discussed in diSessa 2000; the intuitive knowledge principle is</p><p>also much discussed in terms of how knowledge functions in modern workplaces; see</p><p>Gee, Hull, & Lankshear 1996. For multimodality, see Kress & van Leeuwen 1996,</p><p>2001.</p><p>05 gee ch 4 3/13/03 12:08 PM Page 112</p><p>5</p><p>TELLING AND DOING:</p><p>WHY DOESN’T LARA CROFT</p><p>OBEY PROFESSOR VON CROY?</p><p>OVERT INFORMATION</p><p>AND IMMERSION IN PRACTICE</p><p>IN TERMS OF HUMAN LEARNING, INFORMATION IS A VEXED THING.</p><p>On one hand, humans are quite poor at learning from lots of overt informa-</p><p>tion given to them outside the sorts of contexts in which this information can</p><p>be used. This problem can be mitigated if the learners have already had lots</p><p>of experience of such contexts and can simulate the contexts in their minds as</p><p>they listen to or read information. Humans tend to have a very hard time</p><p>processing information for which they cannot supply such simulations. They</p><p>also tend readily to forget information they have received outside contexts of</p><p>actual use, especially if they cannot imagine such contexts.</p><p>On the other hand, humans don’t learn well when they are just left to</p><p>their own devices to operate within complex contexts about which they know</p><p>very little. Children who know no physics and have no mathematical tools</p><p>but who are nonetheless left to discover Galileo’s principles of motion on</p><p>their own by mucking around with ramps and balls are likely only to be an-</p><p>gered and frustrated. In fact, since Galileo used his deep knowledge of geom-</p><p>etry to discover these principles, the children are actually being asked to</p><p>engage in a harder task than the one Galileo (a genius if there ever was one)</p><p>faced, since they lack both his prior knowledge and sophisticated tools.</p><p>The dilemma then is this: For efficacious learning, humans need overt in-</p><p>formation, but they have a hard time handling it. They also need immersion</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 113</p><p>114 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>in actual contexts of practice, but they can find such contexts confusing with-</p><p>out overt information and guidance. This is just the dilemma between overt</p><p>telling versus immersion in practice that has characterized educational debates</p><p>for years. Educators tend to polarize the debate by stressing one thing (telling</p><p>or immersion) over the other and not discussing effective ways to balance and</p><p>integrate the two. They tend to associate support for overt telling in education</p><p>with conservative politics and support for immersion in practice with liberal</p><p>politics. Needless to say, they have not solved the problem.</p><p>The makers of video games—good capitalists that they are—have no such</p><p>luxury. If they don’t solve this problem, no one is going to learn to play their</p><p>games. And if no one can learn their games, no one will buy them. If only for</p><p>good old “Darwinian” reasons (the survival-of-the-fittest theories of learning on</p><p>the market), the games that survive and flourish on the market have solved the</p><p>problem. Indeed, different games solve it in different ways. This is just a specific</p><p>example of a point I am trying to make quite generally in this book: Good video</p><p>games incorporate good learning principles, because otherwise there would be</p><p>no video games, because too few people would have purchased them.</p><p>In this chapter—through a discussion of two good video games—I take</p><p>up some of the ways in which video games deal with overt information and</p><p>guidance on one hand and immersion in practice on the other. Their solution</p><p>to our dilemma is to deny there are two hands here and to see overt informa-</p><p>tion and immersion in practice as two fingers on the same hand.</p><p>LEARNING TO BE LARA CROFT</p><p>Lara Croft, the heroine of the Tomb Raider series of games (and now a movie),</p><p>is one of the most famous video-game characters in the world. Lara is the</p><p>pampered aristocratic daughter of Lord Henshingly Croft, and she has</p><p>wanted for nothing in her (virtual) life. When Lara was a young girl, a lecture</p><p>by the noted archaeologist Professor Werner Von Croy triggered in her a</p><p>lifelong desire for travel to remote places in search of adventure. Some time</p><p>after hearing that lecture, when Lara was 16 and away at boarding school, she</p><p>came across a copy of National Geographic magazine that featured an article</p><p>by Von Croy. From the article, Lara learned that he was preparing for a new</p><p>archaeological tour across Asia.</p><p>Lara showed the article to her parents and demanded to accompany Von</p><p>Croy on his expedition. Lord Henshingly then wrote Von Croy offering him</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 114</p><p>115v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>financial assistance if he would let Lara join him. Von Croy replied that he</p><p>remembered Lara’s incessant but insightful questions at his earlier lecture.</p><p>Her company as an assistant was welcomed, as was the offer of financial sup-</p><p>port. Thus, Von Croy became Lara’s mentor. Tomb Raider games depict Lara</p><p>as an adult using the skills she learned as a young girl from Von Croy and</p><p>pursuing danger, knowledge, and adventure across the world.</p><p>Lara—one of the few female lead characters in video games—is one of the</p><p>most physically agile characters in the world of such games. The player can</p><p>manipulate Lara to engage in more physical maneuvers than most other he-</p><p>roes in adventure and shooter games. She can walk, run, do both standing and</p><p>running jumps, jump back, crouch, duck, roll, climb, cling to ledges and ma-</p><p>neuver along them, and even jump and swing on vines and branches. She (the</p><p>player) uses all these skills to defeat enemies and to explore the treacherous</p><p>landscapes of ancient tombs and temples, deserts, jungles, and foreign cities.</p><p>So far what I have described—the story of Von Croy and Lara—is only</p><p>back story, a story that gamers are told (in the booklet that comes with a</p><p>game or in bits and pieces they have learned while playing the games) but</p><p>haven’t experienced for themselves. However, Tomb Raider: The Last Revela-</p><p>tion, a game late in the series, returns to this back story as part of the game.</p><p>The first episode in Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation shows Lara as a 16-year-</p><p>old being trained by Professor Von Croy after they have just broken into an</p><p>ancient and sacred royal tomb in Cambodia. The player now actually gets to</p><p>live and play Lara’s apprenticeship when she was a girl.</p><p>This first episode is a real part of the game. (An episode is like a chapter</p><p>in a book.) The player must search for treasures and avoid many pitfalls and</p><p>dangers, just as in any other episode, though things are easier here than they</p><p>are in the later episodes. At the same time, however, this episode is also</p><p>meant as a training module where the player is explicitly coached on how to</p><p>play the game. This coaching is done in a fascinating way. As Von Croy trains</p><p>Lara to be an adventurer, he is also simultaneously training the player to op-</p><p>erate the computer controls and play the game. While similar things appear</p><p>in other games, they are handled here in a particularly nice way.</p><p>After an opening video showing Von Croy bursting into the ancient</p><p>Cambodian tomb (a very large building with many levels and twisting paths)</p><p>and a display of the words “Cambodia 1984,” we hear Von Croy say, “And so</p><p>we breech the sanctum of the ancients, the first footfalls in this tomb for cen-</p><p>turies.” We then immediately see the young Lara next to him, looking</p><p>06 gee ch 5</p><p>3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 115</p><p>116 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>around in awe, and hear her say, “This place gives me the creeps, [pause]</p><p>after you.” This sort of not-so-respectful patter is typical of Lara, a rather</p><p>spoiled and self-satisfied young girl.</p><p>Von Croy proceeds to tell Lara to be careful, that not all is as it seems.</p><p>Concealed traps and pitfalls are everywhere. She is to stay close to him and</p><p>follow his instructions. Since good men have died for the information con-</p><p>tained in this tomb—and bad ones have “bartered the information for their</p><p>own ends”—Von Croy insists that “[f]or this we must respect it, we will not</p><p>deviate from its route and you will not deviate from my instruction.” Alto-</p><p>gether, Von Croy comes across as an intimidating and dominating professor.</p><p>But, of course, Lara is not cowered by him. She has, after all, just said that</p><p>he gives her the creeps even more than the old tomb itself. The game encour-</p><p>ages the player not to be too deferential to Von Croy either. Even though Von</p><p>Croy has told Lara (the player) to stay close and not deviate from the straight</p><p>route ahead, the only way that the player (Lara) can find hidden treasures (like</p><p>golden skulls) is to wander away from him and explore things a bit. In fact, as</p><p>Von Croy is commanding Lara to stay close, a willful player (as Lara) is prob-</p><p>ably looking behind a group of pillars to see if they hide anything interesting.</p><p>If players are not willful in this way, by the end of the episode they will have</p><p>missed lots of good stuff and probably will play it over again.</p><p>The player is placed, by the very design of the game, in the same psycho-</p><p>logical space as Lara—learning from Von Croy but not subordinating oneself</p><p>entirely to his old-fashioned professorial need for dominance. The game’s</p><p>design encourages the player to take on a certain sort of attitude and rela-</p><p>tionship with Von Croy—and, more generally, a certain sort of personality—</p><p>that represents, in fact, just the sort of person that Lara is.</p><p>When I played the game, I was a bit intimidated by Von Croy. Based prob-</p><p>ably on a lifetime of (trying to look as if I am) following the orders of authority</p><p>figures like deans, I found myself wanting to follow his orders to the T. But I</p><p>also wanted the treasures and found myself guiltily sneaking down paths off</p><p>Von Croy’s route and thereby becoming more like Lara and less like myself.</p><p>The game has a neat way to ensure that even inept players will dis-</p><p>cover that they can find good things if they are willing to disobey the pro-</p><p>fessor. For example, when I was playing the game, at one point Von Croy</p><p>ordered Lara to jump across a cavern; in doing so, she fell in the water</p><p>below, due to my ineptness in controlling her (via the computer’s keys).</p><p>She can climb back up again and try the jump again (indeed, she needs to</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 116</p><p>117v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>do this to follow Von Croy and eventually complete the episode). But, low</p><p>and behold, as I (Lara) swam toward land, I (Lara) discovered a golden</p><p>skull in the water. A player cannot help but think: What if I purposely dis-</p><p>obey orders and jump and climb other than where I am told? What other</p><p>good things will I find? Soon one is just a bit more like the willful and</p><p>spoiled Lara herself (and practicing yet more jumps and climbs). In such</p><p>video games, players get practice in trying out new identities that chal-</p><p>lenge some of their assumptions about themselves and the world. A good</p><p>science class should do the same.</p><p>STRANGE LANGUAGE:</p><p>VON CROY TEACHES LARA</p><p>HOW TO PLAY A VIDEO GAME</p><p>After Von Croy has told Lara to follow closely and has pushed a hidden stone</p><p>in a wall to lower a floor-full of sharp spikes ahead, they come to a small ob-</p><p>stacle. Von Croy says, “The first obstacle, a small hop to test your—how do</p><p>you say—pluck. Press and hold walk, now push forward.”</p><p>Now this is, if you think about it, a strange thing to say. However, it</p><p>does not seem the least bit strange when one is actually playing the episode.</p><p>Von Croy is talking to the virtual character Lara, a character who walks and</p><p>jumps in the virtual world but has no computer whose keys she can press,</p><p>push, or hold. However, the player who is playing as the character Lara does</p><p>have a computer and must learn to manipulate its keys to make Lara come</p><p>alive. (I played Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation on a computer, but Tomb</p><p>Raider games are also available, and probably more often played on, game</p><p>platforms, which, of course, have controls of their own—controls on a hand-</p><p>held controller—that the player needs to learn.) Thus, Von Croy’s remark</p><p>perfectly melds and integrates talk to Lara and talk to the player. This meld-</p><p>ing is part of what marries the player’s real-world identity as a player and his</p><p>or her virtual identity as Lara.</p><p>But things are even yet more interesting here. When Von Croy says,</p><p>“Press and hold walk,” he means for the player to press and hold the Shift</p><p>key on the computer, which is the key that makes Lara walk rather than</p><p>run. (When she walks she automatically stops at ledges; when she runs, she</p><p>runs past them and falls. It is easier to have her walk up to dangerous</p><p>ledges than to run up to them.) When Von Croy continues with “now</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 117</p><p>118 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>push forward,” he means for the player, who is now holding down the</p><p>Shift key, to press the Arrow key pointing up on the computer, which is</p><p>the key that moves Lara forward. When the player does this combination</p><p>of keystrokes, Lara walks up to the obstacle and automatically stops at its</p><p>edge. She is now ready to jump.</p><p>At this point Von Croy says, “Come, come, child, do not fear, this is</p><p>merely an appetizer for the perils ahead. Push forward and jump together.”</p><p>This tells the player to press the Up Arrow key (move forward) and the Alt</p><p>key (the key that makes Lara jump) together. When the player does so, Lara</p><p>easily jumps over the obstacle.</p><p>Here Von Croy is using the functional names for the keys, the actions</p><p>they carry out in the virtual world, actions like “walk,” “forward,” and</p><p>“jump,” rather than the computer names for the keys, things like “Shift key,”</p><p>“Up Arrow key,” and “Alt key.” So, then, how does the player know what</p><p>keys to press? A player knows this in three ways.</p><p>1. The player can do as I did and look in the booklet that comes with</p><p>the game. This means that when the player is listening to Von Croy,</p><p>he or she is simultaneously looking up the computer key equivalents</p><p>of his commands (another way in which the virtual and real worlds</p><p>are married).</p><p>2. The player can make intelligent guesses from having played other</p><p>Tomb Raider games or games like them.</p><p>3. The player can do as my child does in similar circumstances and press</p><p>all the keys until he or she gets the right result and thereby finds the</p><p>right key.</p><p>Throughout the first episode, Von Croy continues to talk this way,</p><p>telling the player (Lara) about even more complicated actions that he or</p><p>she (and Lara) can do, saying things like: “This gap is wider and the edge</p><p>is treacherous. First walk to the edge. Then press forward and jump to-</p><p>gether. When you are in midair, press and hold action. You will grab the</p><p>outcrop.” By the end of the episode, the player has both finished the first</p><p>episode of the game (and it’s a very long game, like most good video</p><p>games) and learned how to operate the basic controls. The player also has</p><p>learned some basic strategies of how to explore the virtual world and avoid</p><p>certain dangers.</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 118</p><p>119v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>LARA AND LEARNING</p><p>Why is this “strange” language not actually strange when one is playing the</p><p>game? In a good many video games, players hear such language, language</p><p>that “confuses” the virtual world (e.g., “walk”) and the real world of the</p><p>player at the computer (e.g., “press the walk key”). Such language, in fact,</p><p>represents a very basic and crucial learning principle, one regularly ignored</p><p>in schools. Learners cannot</p><p>use the term “connectionism” in</p><p>the book; instead I simply talk about what it means to discover patterns in</p><p>our experience and what it means to be “networked” with other people and</p><p>with various tools and technologies (like computers and the Internet) so that</p><p>one can behave “smarter” than one actually is.</p><p>None of these three areas—work on situated cognition, New Literacy</p><p>Studies, and a pattern-recognition view of the mind—represents a viewpoint</p><p>that is universally agreed on. Many disagree with each one and, indeed, all</p><p>three. Furthermore, my “introduction” to these areas, via video games, is</p><p>highly selective. People who know little about these areas will pick up only</p><p>the big picture. People who know a lot about them will quickly realize that I</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 8</p><p>9v INTRODUCTION v</p><p>am developing my own perspectives in each of these areas, while many other</p><p>perspectives exist as well. Nonetheless, I believe that these three areas cap-</p><p>ture central truths about the human mind and human learning and that these</p><p>truths are well represented in the ways in which good video games are</p><p>learned and played.</p><p>These truths are often less well represented in today’s schools. And this</p><p>book is about schools as well. It is a plea to build schooling on better princi-</p><p>ples of learning. If we have to learn this from video games, and not from a</p><p>field with as boring a name as cognitive science, then so be it. I know that</p><p>many people, especially on the right wing of the political spectrum, will find</p><p>this idea absurd. So be that as well. (My book The New Work Order, written</p><p>with Glynda Hull and Colin Lankshear, is, in part, about why the old distinc-</p><p>tions between “right” and “left” don’t make much sense anymore in the mod-</p><p>ern global world of the so-called new capitalism.)</p><p>Let me end this introduction with a few short points. First, while I talk a</p><p>good deal about actual video games, I really intend to discuss the potential of</p><p>video games. The games get better and more sophisticated all the time and at</p><p>a rapid pace. Much of what I have to say here will simply get “truer” as the</p><p>games get even better. This is my consolation for the fact that any games I</p><p>mention will be, for some players, “out of date,” replaced by newer ones by</p><p>the time anyone reads this book.</p><p>Second, I am aware that many readers will not have played—or will not</p><p>currently be playing—video games, especially the type I discuss. I will try to</p><p>be as clear and explicit as I can about the games, so that all readers can form a</p><p>picture of what I am talking about.</p><p>Readers who want to explore the many types of video games, see pictures</p><p>from them, even download demonstrations of various games, and otherwise</p><p>find out more about them can log on to a wide array of Internet sites devoted</p><p>to video games. Any game I mention in this book can be thoroughly investi-</p><p>gated in this way. Here are some sites I can recommend, though there are</p><p>many others: gamezone.com, gamedex.com, pcgamer.com, gamepro.com,</p><p>gamespot.com, ign.com, MrFixitOnline.com, womengamers.com, and game-</p><p>critics.com. Joystick101.org offers up-to-the-minute articles and critical per-</p><p>spectives, beyond reviews, about games and controversial issues about games.</p><p>Third, I am not, in this book, meaning to imply that I think “old” baby</p><p>boomers like me ought to run out and start playing video games. Many will</p><p>find the games too hard and frustrating, without the personal payoff that</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 9</p><p>10 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>makes for continued practice. Nonetheless, we can learn a lot from those</p><p>young people who play games, if only we take them and their games seri-</p><p>ously. And, indeed, I am always struck by how many people, even some of the</p><p>liberal advocates of multiculturalism, readily decry and seek to override peo-</p><p>ple’s cultures when these cultures are popular peer-based ones centered</p><p>around things like video games. Let it be said, too, having mentioned multi-</p><p>culturalism, that a great many African Americans love video games, just as do</p><p>a great many Anglo Americans and everyone else in between. And, yes, poor</p><p>children and teenagers do play video games, even if they have to find a com-</p><p>puter or game console at school, in a library, or community center, or at a</p><p>friend’s house. There are important issues of equity here, though, and I dis-</p><p>cuss these at the end of the book.</p><p>Finally, there is this: Two issues have taken up the vast majority of writ-</p><p>ing about video games: violence (e.g., shooting and killing in games, depic-</p><p>tions of crime) and gender (e.g., whether and how much girls play, whether</p><p>and how video games depict women poorly). I have nothing whatsoever to</p><p>say about these issues in this book. They are well discussed elsewhere. I do,</p><p>however, discuss, in chapter 6, some very heated social and political issues</p><p>that arise when considering video games at a time when, thanks to free pow-</p><p>erful software, almost any group can design a sophisticated 3-D video game</p><p>to represent its own values and interests.</p><p>Though they are not important for the basic argument of this book, my</p><p>own views on the violence and gender issues are as follows: The issue of vio-</p><p>lence and video games is widely overblown (especially in a world where real</p><p>people are regularly really killing real people in wars across the world that we</p><p>watch on television). Debate over violence in video games is one more way in</p><p>which we want to talk about technology (or drugs, for that matter) doing</p><p>things to people rather than talking about the implications of people’s overall</p><p>social and economic contexts.</p><p>In any case, shooting is an easy form of social interaction (!) to program.</p><p>As realistic forms of conversation become more computationally possible (a</p><p>very hard task), I predict that shooting will be less important and talking</p><p>more important in many games, even shooter games. Even now, many shoot-</p><p>ing games stress stealth, story, and social interaction more than they used to.</p><p>Furthermore, there are many categories of very sophisticated video</p><p>games—simulations and some strategy games—that do not involve any vio-</p><p>lence at all. Nonetheless, I base my arguments in this book in part on shooter</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 10</p><p>11v INTRODUCTION v</p><p>games, precisely because they are the “hardest” case. It’s pretty clear that a</p><p>simulation game (like SimCity) involves important learning principles, if only</p><p>because many scientists themselves use such simulation techniques. How-</p><p>ever, it is easier to miss and dismiss the learning principles in other sorts of</p><p>games. But they are very much there, nonetheless.</p><p>As to gender: I have no doubt that video games, like most other popular</p><p>cultural forms, overstress young, buxom, and beautiful women in their con-</p><p>tent. Furthermore, with several major exceptions, these woman are often not</p><p>the main characters in the games. However, as more girls and women play</p><p>games, this will change. And, indeed, in role-playing games, you can design</p><p>your own character. In a game I am playing at the present time (Dungeon</p><p>Siege), I am an African American female, though I could only make my skin</p><p>light black and my body fairly shapely; wider choices will, I am sure, be avail-</p><p>able as time goes on. (I personally don’t want to play in a fantasy world as a</p><p>balding, overweight, aging white male, since I get plenty of opportunity to do</p><p>that in the real world, but, then, my identical twin was upset, when he was</p><p>designing his character for the game that he could not design such a charac-</p><p>ter as the hero.) Games, of course, reflect the culture we live in—a culture we</p><p>can change.</p><p>As to the issue of girls and women playing games, they are quickly catch-</p><p>ing up with the boys and men, though they often play different games (e.g.,</p><p>The Sims). Nevertheless, there are Internet sites devoted to women who play</p><p>the sorts of shooter games more commonly associated with males. When we</p><p>academics feel our interests define the world, we should keep in mind the fol-</p><p>lowing fact: The largest category</p><p>do much with lots of overt information that a</p><p>teacher has explicitly told them outside the context of immersion in actual</p><p>practice. At the same time, learners cannot learn without some overt infor-</p><p>mation; they cannot discover everything for themselves.</p><p>The solution is to give information in context and to couch it in ways</p><p>that make sense in the context of embodied action. Consider a simple real-</p><p>world example. Telling someone “When your car is skidding, turn the wheel</p><p>in the direction of the skid” works less well than saying “When your car is</p><p>skidding, look in the direction of the skid.” (Of course, when the driver looks</p><p>in that direction, he or she will turn the wheel in that direction.) The latter</p><p>formulation couches the information in a way that allows it to be integrated</p><p>with embodied action both in the learner’s mental simulation and in actual</p><p>action on the spot.</p><p>In good classroom science instruction, an instructor does not lecture for</p><p>an extended period and then tell the learners to go off and apply what they</p><p>have learned in a group science activity. The learners won’t remember most</p><p>of what they have heard. And, in any case, none of it will have made much</p><p>sense in a situated and embodied way that is actually usable. Yet good science</p><p>instructors don’t just turn learners loose to engage in activities with no help</p><p>at all.</p><p>Rather, as group members are discovering things through their own ac-</p><p>tivity, the good science instructor comes up, assesses the progress they are</p><p>making and the fruitfulness of the paths down which they are proceeding in</p><p>their inquiry, and then gives overt information that is, at that point, usable.</p><p>The instructor gives group members information that facilitates their further</p><p>movement down a fruitful path they are already on, or sends them down a re-</p><p>lated but more fruitful path than the one on which they have hit, or gets</p><p>them to think about an aspect of the phenomenon they are investigating that</p><p>they have not yet considered but for which they are ready and ripe. And, in-</p><p>deed, after such embodied inquiry, there are even times when learners need</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 119</p><p>120 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>and are ready for lectures. They are now able to give a good many of the</p><p>words and phrases in the lecture situated and embodied meanings through</p><p>the their own mental simulations of former and future actions.</p><p>However, there is more at stake in Von Croy’s “mixed” language—lan-</p><p>guage that mixes talk to Lara about the virtual world and to the player about</p><p>the game’s controls. Such language is one among many devices in a good</p><p>video game that encourages the player to relate, juxtapose, and meld his or</p><p>her real-world identity (actually, multiple real-world identities) and the vir-</p><p>tual identity of the character he or she is playing in the virtual world of the</p><p>game. Such a process also encourages the player to adopt what I called in</p><p>chapter 3 a projective identity.</p><p>I argued earlier that projective identities are the heart and soul of active</p><p>and critical learning. Children who take responsibility for the sort of class-</p><p>room virtual scientist they are and will become throughout the school year</p><p>and relate this proactively to their real-world identities (some of which may</p><p>have started as virtual identities in other play or school domains) are engaged</p><p>in real learning, learning as a refashioning of self. Of course, no child can do</p><p>this if no such virtual identity and world—a world of imagined scientists and</p><p>science enacted in words, deeds, and texts—is present in the classroom.</p><p>But let me return to our game. As is typical of training modules in good</p><p>video games, this first training episode of Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation</p><p>does not tell the player everything he or she needs to know and do in order to</p><p>play the rest of game. All the episode does is give the player enough informa-</p><p>tion and skill to play and learn from the subsequent episodes. Since each</p><p>episode gets more difficult, the player is, in fact, always both playing and</p><p>learning. Indeed, the distinction between playing (doing the actual activity)</p><p>and learning is blurred in a video game, as is the distinction between master</p><p>and beginner, since players always willingly face new challenges as a game</p><p>progresses (games get harder as they progress) and as new games do new</p><p>things, make new demands, and get better and better at challenging players</p><p>in creative ways.</p><p>When the second episode of Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation begins, Von</p><p>Croy challenges Lara (you) to put your newly acquired skills to the test in a</p><p>race against him through unfamiliar territory to grab a sacred stone in an-</p><p>other part of the temple. Unfortunately, after he says, “We will race for the</p><p>Iris, on the count of three: one, two,” he takes off without saying “three,” giv-</p><p>ing himself a good head start.</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 120</p><p>121v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>If you’ve found and collected all eight golden skulls in the first episode,</p><p>Von Croy chooses the Path of the Heretical, a more difficult test. If you</p><p>haven’t found all the skulls, then he chooses the Path of the Virtuous, an eas-</p><p>ier test. This is typical of good video games and represents several of the</p><p>learning principles discussed earlier: A good video game adapts to the level of</p><p>the player, rewards different players differently (but rewards them all), and</p><p>often stays at the edge of the player’s regime of competence.</p><p>It is also interesting and an important fact that the game rewards the</p><p>player for finding the golden skulls. Finding them requires the player to dis-</p><p>regard Von Croy’s commands to stay close and follow his every command.</p><p>The player is encouraged by the very design of the game to be more Lara-</p><p>like—playful and willful—leaving behind his or her own fears and hesitations</p><p>about authority and the risks of exploration.</p><p>LEARNING IN A SUBDOMAIN</p><p>OF THE FULL DOMAIN</p><p>The third episode of the game starts with Lara, now an adult, off adventuring</p><p>in Egypt. Von Croy, older as well, returns from time to time in the story. By</p><p>now the player has learned and lived through Lara’s back story—even learned</p><p>where and how she got her famous backpack (indeed, the player playing Lara</p><p>as a teenager has picked it up). So, are the first two episodes “training”</p><p>(“learning”) or a “real” part of the game? They are, of course, both. In a good</p><p>video game, the player learns to play the game by playing in a “subdomain”</p><p>of the real game. This is an important learning principle and, again, one reg-</p><p>ularly ignored in school.</p><p>Many video games have an explicitly labeled training module. For exam-</p><p>ple, many shooter games (like Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon, Half-Life, Deus Ex, or</p><p>Max Payne) have such modules where instructors—sometimes sergeants</p><p>shouting at you, sometimes more gentle instructors, even peaceful-looking</p><p>female holograms as in the training module for Half-Life—talk to the player</p><p>just as Von Croy talked to Lara (you). These modules are not episodes in the</p><p>game, but the player moves through the same sorts of landscapes, performs</p><p>the same sorts of actions, and engages with the same sorts of artifacts as in</p><p>the “real” game (except the only way you can get killed in the training mod-</p><p>ule is by blowing yourself up while trying to learn how to use dynamite and</p><p>similar items, something I have done on more than one occasion).</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 121</p><p>122 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>Once the game proper starts, the first episode (sometimes several early</p><p>episodes) is almost always something of a training module, even though it</p><p>may not be labeled explicitly as such. In this episode, things are less hectic</p><p>and demanding than they will get later on. (This is not to say that things</p><p>aren’t hectic and demanding, enough to provide a feel for the game world</p><p>and what is to come). System Shock 2 provides a particularly good example of</p><p>this sort of first episode.</p><p>In the first episode, the player is rarely under any sort of time pressure and</p><p>generally pays only a small</p><p>price for mistakes. Usually no demanding enemies—</p><p>often none at all—attack the player. Furthermore, this episode usually offers a</p><p>concentrated sample of the most basic and important actions, artifacts, and in-</p><p>teractions that the player will need to deal with throughout the game.</p><p>Nonetheless, these early episodes are very much part of the game and its</p><p>story. Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation combines the training module and the</p><p>early episodes as places where demands are lowered enough so that lots of</p><p>fundamental learning can be done “on site” in the “real” world (i.e., in this</p><p>case, the “real virtual world”) of the game (and not, say, in books or through</p><p>lots of overt instruction out of context).</p><p>By saying that in a good video game, players learn to play the game by</p><p>playing in a “subdomain” of the real game, I mean that training modules and</p><p>early episodes, where fundamental learning gets done, are built as simplified</p><p>versions of the same world in which the player will live, play, and learn</p><p>throughout the game. Learning is not started in a separate place (e.g., a class-</p><p>room or textbook) outside the domain in which the learning is going to oper-</p><p>ate. At the same time, the learner is not thrown into the “real” thing—the full</p><p>game—and left to swim or drown.</p><p>Because good video games have training modules, early episodes as fur-</p><p>ther training in the fundamentals, and more advanced learning throughout as</p><p>one is ready, all done in the game’s virtual world, something interesting hap-</p><p>pens to the learner. Let me tell you a little story to make the point: Once</p><p>when I was giving a talk about video games and learning, there were two ex-</p><p>cellent game players (and computer experts) in their mid-20s in the audi-</p><p>ence—dragged to the talk by the academic whose research they assisted.</p><p>After my talk, this academic asked them publicly what they thought about</p><p>what I had said. Were the sorts of learning principles I had talked about re-</p><p>ally operating in these games? The two players both said that, yes, they were</p><p>aware that such principles were at work when they were playing video and</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 122</p><p>123v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>computer games, but that they had never thought of what they were doing as</p><p>“learning.”</p><p>This is what is magical about learning in good video games—and in good</p><p>classrooms, too—learners are not always overtly aware of the fact that that</p><p>are “learning,” how much they are learning, or how difficult it is. Learners</p><p>are embedded in a domain (a semiotic domain like a branch of science or a</p><p>good video game) where, even when they are learning (and since the domain</p><p>gets progressively harder, they are always learning), they are still in the do-</p><p>main, still a member of the team (affinity group), still actually playing the</p><p>game, even if only as a “newbie.”</p><p>TRANSFER AND BEYOND IN VIDEO GAMES</p><p>Of course, there are times in a video game where players recognize that they</p><p>are learning. These are the times—and, as the game progresses, such times</p><p>become more common—where learners see that their now-routinized mas-</p><p>tery, developed earlier in the game and in playing similar games, breaks</p><p>down. They face a new challenge for which their now-routinized skills don’t</p><p>work. In cases like this, a form of learning happens that is just the sort we</p><p>want to encourage in school but often have little success doing: transfer of</p><p>prior knowledge mixed with innovation. Let me make this point with an ex-</p><p>tended example from my own game playing.</p><p>By the end of the first-person shooter game Return to Castle Wolfenstein, I</p><p>had learned a strategy for killing Nazi “Super Soldiers” (robotlike, mechanically</p><p>and biologically enhanced beings who can take and give a great deal of damage)</p><p>of which I was quite proud. In fact, I had gotten quite good at this strategy.</p><p>Here is what I did: I positioned myself quite far from a Super Soldier, be-</p><p>hind good cover, and then sniped at him using a long-distance rifle with a</p><p>good scope, ducking below cover each time the Super Soldier fired back.</p><p>After many shots, the Super Soldier died, and I had suffered little or no dam-</p><p>age. Suffering little or no damage is important—it does little good to win a</p><p>battle but have so few health points left that you will easily die in the next</p><p>battle, even with a weak opponent, before you can find a health kit to heal</p><p>yourself. In a closer battle with a Super Soldier, even if I won, I tended to</p><p>take lots of damage, which left me too weak for the fights to come. However,</p><p>I do know other players who learned good strategies for defeating the Super</p><p>Soldiers up close without taking too much damage.</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 123</p><p>124 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>At the end of Return to Castle Wolfenstein, the player (playing U.S. Office</p><p>of Secret Actions’ Agent Major B. J. Blazkowitz—a very famous video-game</p><p>character, because he originally appeared in one of early first-person shooter</p><p>games, Wolfenstein 3D, a game some consider the “mother” of all first-person</p><p>shooter games) must face Heinrich I, an ancient deadly knight the Nazis have</p><p>risen from his grave through dark mysterious rituals. Heinrich is one heck of</p><p>a Super Soldier. He can cause zombies to rise from the ground to attack you</p><p>(Blazkowitz). Furthermore, he can cause a myriad of spirits to fly through the</p><p>air, find you wherever you are trying to hide, and attack you. If you get close</p><p>to Heinrich, he can cause rocks from surrounding pillars and arches to fall on</p><p>you; he can pull you in closer to him by swiping his sword on the ground; and</p><p>he can easily kill you with one blow of his massive sword.</p><p>Trying to hide behind cover and snipe Heinrich does not work—trust</p><p>me, I tried it many times. The flying spirits find you every time and kill you.</p><p>So, I discovered that my routinized strategy was no good. At this point, the</p><p>game forced me—at its very end, to boot—to try other things and learn</p><p>something new, or not finish it.</p><p>Of course, in such a situation, players can call on experiences they have</p><p>had in other games, adapting them to the current circumstances, or they can</p><p>try something entirely new. The first strategy, calling on previous experience,</p><p>is an example of what learning theorists call “transfer.” An example of trans-</p><p>fer at work would be a case where a student applies something he or she has</p><p>learned about reasoning in biology to a new problem faced in a social studies</p><p>class. Transfer does not always work and can be dangerous. (Maybe social</p><p>studies is better off not being done in the style of biological thinking; then</p><p>again, maybe not.) Transfer requires active learning and, if it is not to be dan-</p><p>gerous, critical learning.</p><p>At one time, cognitive psychologists considered transfer to be a fairly easy</p><p>phenomenon. Then they went through a stage of thinking that people were,</p><p>in fact, quite bad at transfer and it was, for all practical purposes, impossible to</p><p>trigger transfer in school learning. Now they believe transfer is crucial to</p><p>learning but not at all easy to trigger in learners, especially in school. Getting</p><p>transfer to happen typically requires making the learners overtly aware of how</p><p>two different problems or domains share certain properties at a deeper level.</p><p>That is, it requires thinking at a design level, thinking about how two prob-</p><p>lems or domains are structured or “designed” in similar ways, ways that may</p><p>be obscured by the more superficial features of the problems or domains.</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 124</p><p>125v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>Facing Heinrich, and having failed many times, I decided to call on what</p><p>I had learned in playing other video games. I tried a strategy I had learned</p><p>from American McGee’s Alice when trying to kill “bosses” (particularly power-</p><p>ful enemies). I moved wildly around, zigzagging around and away from</p><p>Heinrich, stopping only quickly to shoot him a couple of times with my most</p><p>powerful weapons, moving again to avoid his fire and the zombies and spirits</p><p>he sent after me, all the while frantically searching for health</p><p>kits laying</p><p>among the fallen rocks and rubble that would repair the damage I was taking.</p><p>This strategy had worked to kill bosses like the Duchess, the Centipede,</p><p>and the Queen of Hearts in Alice. It almost worked here. I survived longer</p><p>than I had in all my other attempts. But, alas, Heinrich got me in the end. I</p><p>went down with more pride and dignity (remember, in my projective identity,</p><p>I care about such things), but I went down nonetheless.</p><p>Since some of the Alice strategy seemed to work, I needed to think about</p><p>what in it to keep and what in it to change. Here is where transfer marries in-</p><p>novation. In this type of situation, the player has to think of something new</p><p>(new to the player, at least; others may have already hit on it) in the context of</p><p>keeping what is useful from past experience. This is a key moment for active</p><p>and potentially critical learning. It is the place where previous experience is,</p><p>at one and the same time, recruited and transformed, giving rise to newer ex-</p><p>periences that can be used and transformed in the future.</p><p>Here is what I did. First I used another instance of transfer and did</p><p>something I have done in a good many shooter games: I ran out of a tunnel I</p><p>was in, quickly pounded Heinrich with four rockets from my rocket gun, and</p><p>then ran quickly back into my tunnel. Often in shooter games some of your</p><p>enemies will follow you into the tunnel or other such narrow space, and they</p><p>become easier targets, since they are not all spread out and you see them</p><p>coming at you in a direct line. Some of Heinrich’s key helpers (three Dread</p><p>Knights and the Nazi who had brought him back to life) ran after me, and I</p><p>easily killed them.</p><p>Heinrich was momentarily without helpers, though that would soon</p><p>change. Now I knew I had to run out and face him—he was not about to fol-</p><p>low me back to the tunnel and would have killed me there, in any case, by</p><p>sending his spirits at me from afar (his version of my sniping strategy). The</p><p>Alice strategy wasn’t going to work without some serious modification. What</p><p>to do? There is, of course, only one way to proceed: Think and try some-</p><p>thing. If you die, you go back to the drawing board.</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 125</p><p>126 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>I figured that I had to do my wild moving-around strategy from Alice, but</p><p>closer in to Heinrich. If I stayed close, the flying spirits flew over my head for</p><p>the most part (since they are really a device to stop people from trying to kill</p><p>Heinrich from a distance). Yet if I stayed too close, he would draw me into</p><p>him by hitting the ground with his sword and then, as I flew toward him, he</p><p>would slay me with one blow. What seemed to be called for was a more con-</p><p>strained version of the Alice strategy, stressing moving toward and quickly</p><p>away from Heinrich in straight lines more than the wider and more circular</p><p>motion I had used in Alice. (Other players have had success with circular</p><p>strafing when fighting Heinrich, but I am no good at tightly controlled circu-</p><p>lar movements.)</p><p>I ran out of my tunnel and tried my new part-transfer, part-innovation</p><p>strategy. After four direct battles with Heinrich, interrupted by wild runs to</p><p>find health kits to repair my damage, I had him seriously weakened. Things</p><p>appeared to be working and I had gotten farther than ever before. But by</p><p>then I had just less than half my health, even after I had used the last health</p><p>kit to be found.</p><p>Then something happened that can be added to transfer and innovation</p><p>as a learning strategy: a lucky discovery. As I used the last health kit, I realized</p><p>I was out of ammunition for my Venom gun and switched to my Telsa gun,</p><p>which fires electric rays. I had found the last health kit behind some boxes</p><p>and, as I stood behind them, I noticed that the rather slow-moving Heinrich</p><p>was moving toward the boxes to finish me off. Thus, I ran quickly around the</p><p>boxes and around behind Heinrich, who was now staring over the boxes at</p><p>where I had been standing. His back momentarily turned to me, I ran right</p><p>up to him and blasted him from behind with the Telsa.</p><p>It was risky, but he had already taken enough damage that this finished</p><p>him off. He died in a rage and I immediately saw a cut scene (a short video).</p><p>The Super Soldier project and the Heinrich project had been Himmler ba-</p><p>bies. In the cut scene I saw Himmler looking through binoculars. He had ob-</p><p>viously been watching my battle with Heinrich from atop a far away hill.</p><p>Himmler says with dismay, “This American, he has ruined everything.” His</p><p>aide then says, “Herr Himmler, the plane is waiting to take you back to Berlin.”</p><p>Himmler is reluctant to go; he obviously does not want to have to explain his</p><p>failure to Hitler. The aide pushes him: “Sir, the Fuehrer is expecting your ar-</p><p>rival.” Himmler walks very slowly back to the car. It’s quite satisfying to have</p><p>finished off Heinrich and to have pissed off Himmler at one and the same time.</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 126</p><p>127v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>Though this example may seem trivial—with its talk of Super Soldiers</p><p>and risen dead—it represents several components of one very important type</p><p>of active learning.</p><p>1. The learner realizes that a more or less routinized strategy does not</p><p>work and quits using it.</p><p>2. The learner transfers skills and strategies from previous experience</p><p>by seeing underlying similarities between that experience and the</p><p>current problem (American McGee’s Alice and Return to Castle Wolfen-</p><p>stein are, at the surface level, quite different games, though both are</p><p>shooter games—Alice is a third-person shooter and Wolfenstein is a</p><p>first-person shooter.)</p><p>3. The learner learns that, while school sometimes sets up problems so</p><p>that earlier solutions transfer directly to later ones, this rarely hap-</p><p>pens in real life. The learner adapts and transforms the earlier experi-</p><p>ence to be transferred to the new problem through creativity and</p><p>innovation.</p><p>4. The learner also uses (and is prepared to use) what he or she discovers—</p><p>often “by accident”—on the spot, on the ground of practice, while im-</p><p>plementing the new transformed strategy (as I did when I circled behind</p><p>Heinrich looking for me over the boxes). This requires reflection not</p><p>after or before action but in the midst of action. The learner remains</p><p>flexible, adapting performance in action.</p><p>SYSTEM SHOCK 2</p><p>System Shock 2, like Deus Ex, combines elements of a role-playing game with</p><p>a first-person shooter. As a story, it also combines genres, combining the sci-</p><p>ence fiction of star travel, the action of a war movie, and the horror of a</p><p>movie like Alien. System Shock 2 takes place in the same fictional world as the</p><p>original System Shock did, a universe in which humans have already colonized</p><p>the solar system. In the first game, a super-powerful artificial intelligence sys-</p><p>tem called SHODAN went crazy and killed many people onboard the</p><p>Citadel Space Station.</p><p>After SHODAN was stopped by the intrepid efforts of whoever played the</p><p>first game, the governments of Earth came together in the United National</p><p>Nominate (UNN). The UNN has struggled to control the megacorporations</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 127</p><p>128 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>that have held power for a long time—the largest of which, the TriOptimum</p><p>Corporation, was responsible for SHODAN’s creation. This power struggle</p><p>between government and the corporations has resulted in an uneasy truce in</p><p>which the UNN holds power officially, but the corporations still hold a great</p><p>deal of de facto power through their own armies and police forces.</p><p>Into this already tension-filled situation comes a new source of potential</p><p>problems: TriOptimum, despite government efforts to keep corporations out</p><p>of such projects, has built a new spaceship, the Von Braun, capable of faster-</p><p>than-light travel. Indeed, the Von Braun is making its maiden voyage far be-</p><p>yond the solar system. The new technologies aboard the Von Braun have not</p><p>been well tested and don’t work as they should. The major problem is the</p><p>ship’s central</p><p>computer, XERXES. XERXES is quite “buggy” and is having</p><p>all sorts of problems (shades of SHODAN). Furthermore, the crew, made up</p><p>of both UNN and TriOptimum personnel, has separated into two warring</p><p>factions that mistrust and hate each other.</p><p>When the Von Braun passes the Tau Ceti star system, it receives, and de-</p><p>cides to respond to, a distress call coming from Tau Ceti. At that point,</p><p>something goes terribly wrong on the ship. This is the disaster to which you</p><p>awake when you—a military officer frozen for the long voyage—are called</p><p>out of cyber-slumber to help solve the problem.</p><p>When you start playing System Shock 2, you start out a few years before</p><p>the Von Braun’s voyage. You arrive at a military recruitment station (in a</p><p>first-person view, so you can’t see yourself, just the world around you). There</p><p>you choose from one of three career paths: the Marines, the Navy, or the</p><p>OSA (a special service that teaches psychic powers). This determines the</p><p>basic statistics (e.g., how strong you are) and skills (e.g., how good you are at</p><p>hacking into computers) with which you will start the game. Marines are</p><p>weapon and combat oriented. Navy personnel are less skilled with weapons</p><p>and are more oriented toward technology and research. They have skills nec-</p><p>essary to hack security programs and to engage in research about the crea-</p><p>tures and objects they find. OSA personnel are sort of like a psychic CIA and</p><p>have developed psychic powers that allow them to do a variety of special</p><p>things (e.g., Kinetic Redirection, which allows you to pull distant objects to-</p><p>ward you, or Remote Electron Tampering, which deactivates all active secu-</p><p>rity alarms).</p><p>Overall there are nine different skills and five different statistics in System</p><p>Shock 2. Each character type starts with some of these and not others, differ-</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 128</p><p>129v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>ent for each type. The nine skills are: Hacking (makes you more effective at</p><p>breaking into enemy computers), Repair (allows you to fix broken items),</p><p>Modify (lets you add new features to your existing weapons), Maintenance</p><p>(helps you keep your weapons in working order), Research (lets you research</p><p>new technologies and enemy physiologies), Standard Combat (makes you an</p><p>expert in the use of conventional weapons like pistols and shotguns), Energy</p><p>Weapons (improves your use of energy weapons like lasers and EMP rifles),</p><p>Heavy Weapons (helps you use larger weapons like Grenade Launchers and</p><p>Fusion Cannons), and Exotic Weapons (gives you more skill with the special</p><p>bioweapons you discover during the game). The five statistics are: Strength,</p><p>Endurance, Psionics, Agility, and Cybernetic Affinity.</p><p>Having made your choice, you sign up for a four-year hitch. In each of</p><p>the first three years you are given a choice of different postings, different for</p><p>each character type, each of which will enhance your character’s skills and</p><p>stats in certain ways. You don’t actually play these initial postings but see</p><p>videos and read about what you have gained by each experience you have</p><p>chosen. Thus, by the time the game play starts in earnest, your own choices</p><p>have shaped the sort of character you are going to be.</p><p>Your initial choice of character and the three postings you have chosen</p><p>set your initial distribution of skills and stats, the ones with which you will</p><p>enter the first episodes of the game. Once you get into the game, you find</p><p>and are sometimes rewarded with (by other characters in the virtual world)</p><p>cybernetic modules. You can use these modules at upgrade units to buy im-</p><p>provements in your different skills and stats. The higher the skill level you</p><p>are attempting to purchase, the more cybernetic modules it costs you.</p><p>Since cybernetic modules are hard to come by, you can become a real ex-</p><p>pert in only a few areas (whether skills or stats or some combination). Thus,</p><p>you must pick intelligently rather than squandering modules on a little of this</p><p>and a little of that. Since some of the best items and weapons in the game re-</p><p>quire you to get the maximum score you can achieve in a specific skill or stat</p><p>before you can use them, if you spend all of your cybernetic module points</p><p>trying to become a generalist, you won’t be able to use these neat items or</p><p>weapons by the end of the game.</p><p>Once you have completed your first three postings, the game proper</p><p>starts. You are in your fourth posting and find yourself awakened from a</p><p>cryo-slumber on the Von Braun with no memory of recent events. You imme-</p><p>diately see that things have gone badly wrong. Pipes are broken, debris is all</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 129</p><p>130 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>over the floor. Bodies are scattered across the ground and you hear crashing</p><p>noises and screams everywhere.</p><p>You are soon contacted via e-mail by Dr. Janice Polito, the Senior Sys-</p><p>tems Analyst onboard the Von Braun, and told that you have been cyberneti-</p><p>cally enhanced so that you can receive messages from her and others on your</p><p>built in “PDA” (Personal Data Assistant). Your cyber-enhancements also</p><p>allow you to use special skills and tools. She tells you that everything has</p><p>gone wrong, though you get no details now. She says only that you need to</p><p>reach her as quickly as possible on level four of the ship. It is no easy task get-</p><p>ting there, since much of the ship is destroyed and XERXES appears to be</p><p>trying to foil your every attempt.</p><p>As you travel around the corridors of the ship, there are three ways</p><p>you learn more about the situation, and, thus, can begin putting the story</p><p>together.</p><p>1. You occasionally get messages on your PDA from Dr. Polito telling</p><p>you about things that have just happened and giving you advice on</p><p>what you must do next.</p><p>2. You find small computer disks scattered around the ship that hold the</p><p>log messages of the crew. As you pick these up and read them, the</p><p>story slowly unfolds and you also get more information on how to</p><p>proceed.</p><p>3. The cybernetic system that’s been installed in you can pick up psychic</p><p>signals. When your system comes in contact with these, it interprets</p><p>them as light and sound. The result is that occasionally, as you move</p><p>through the ship, you see “ghosts” of people in the actions they took</p><p>prior to their deaths.</p><p>Using these clues, you must figure out what has happened to the crew of the</p><p>Von Braun and how you’re going to stop the menace.</p><p>Whatever has taken control of the ship has found a way to infect the</p><p>crew and turn them into zombies. Other creatures you run into, as you move</p><p>through the ship, include giant spiders, cybernetic nursemaids, and stealthy</p><p>cyber-assassins. As you get to the higher decks of the ship, you encounter</p><p>giant security bots and gun turrets that can mow you down in seconds. All of</p><p>these creatures have been designed with AI that allows them each to behave</p><p>differently and seemingly intelligently.</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 130</p><p>131v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>There are many different ways to approach the many fights and prob-</p><p>lems you face in System Shock 2. And, of course, you can play the game as dif-</p><p>ferent characters—Marine, Navy, or OSA—each of which can be designed in</p><p>different ways by your choices at the beginning and throughout the game.</p><p>So, in reality, there are even different types of Marine, Navy, and OSA char-</p><p>acters. Each different set of choices gives the game a different feel, so you can</p><p>play it a number of times as if it were a different game. While you will, on the</p><p>second go-round, know where many of the items are hidden, there’s still a big</p><p>difference between a Heavy Weapons expert blowing up whole groups of</p><p>foes, a Hacker bypassing security systems and doors rather than fighting, and</p><p>a Psi master using mind power to get through problems.</p><p>System Shock 2, like all good video games, recruits a number of the learn-</p><p>ing principles we have already discussed. Players make choices that allow</p><p>them to play the game according to their own favored styles or explore new</p><p>ones. There are multiple routes to solve problems. Players get</p><p>multiple and</p><p>multimodal sources of information to enable their own discoveries about the</p><p>story, the virtual world, and the problems they face. System Shock 2 also has</p><p>training modules and early episodes that, like Tomb Raider: The Last Revela-</p><p>tion, exemplify important learning principles.</p><p>TRAINING MODULES AND EARLY EPISODES</p><p>IN SYSTEM SHOCK 2</p><p>When you are at the recruitment station at the beginning of System Shock 2,</p><p>you can choose to go into several rooms that constitute the game’s training</p><p>modules. Here you hear talk much like the talk that Professor Von Croy ad-</p><p>dressed to Lara Croft in Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation. A disembodied</p><p>voice welcomes you when you enter the first training room and tells you that</p><p>you are about to engage in a virtual training course using a “simulated cyber-</p><p>interface identical to an actual military-grade cyber-interface.” The voice</p><p>then says: “Move the mouse, see how it changes where you look? That means</p><p>you’re in Shoot Mode. Hit the Tab key. This puts you in Use Mode where</p><p>you can use your mouse to interact with items in the world.”</p><p>Once again we see here a language that mixes references to you as a vir-</p><p>tual character in the virtual world of the game (e.g., “actual military-grade</p><p>cyber-interface”) and references to the computer in the real world on which</p><p>you, a real person, are playing the game. You begin to learn to play the game</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 131</p><p>132 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>by engaging in a language that already fuses your real-world identity and</p><p>your virtual identity. The training modules continue this way until you know</p><p>just enough, and not more, to start playing the game “for real” and thereby</p><p>continue your learning through actual game play. There is no attempt to</p><p>make you remember information ahead of time and outside embodied expe-</p><p>rience of specific situations.</p><p>When you start the game proper, you find yourself coming awake to a</p><p>disaster. Dr. Polito tells you to get out quickly before the chambers you are in</p><p>run out of oxygen. Then you must reach her. There is a great deal of commo-</p><p>tion all around you. You find destruction, smoke, burning steam, loose electri-</p><p>cal wires, and dead bodies everywhere as you seek a way out. You feel</p><p>panicked, but you come to realize there is no reason for real panic. This first</p><p>episode—as in many good video games—is both a real part of the game and</p><p>part of your training. It is not really timed and nothing very bad can happen to</p><p>you. You are meant to learn as you proceed. You get to experience the “feel” of</p><p>the game—in this case, the pervasive panic and dread that spreads through-</p><p>out—but without any bad consequences that will deter your learning.</p><p>One way you learn in this first episode and other early episodes of the</p><p>game is by coming upon Information Kiosks as you travel through the lower</p><p>levels of the Von Braun. Each of these is labeled “TriOptimum Information</p><p>Terminal” along the side and says “A service of the TriOptimum corporation,</p><p>presented for your convenience” at the top. When you highlight the kiosk by</p><p>placing your mouse cursor on it, a message at the bottom of the screen says:</p><p>“right click to use information kiosk.” When you right-click the mouse, the</p><p>kiosk opens up a message that gives you information about playing the game</p><p>related to where you are at that time and to actions you will need to take at that</p><p>point or very soon thereafter. This is just-in-time and on-demand information,</p><p>situated in the sorts of contexts in which it makes sense and can be used.</p><p>For example, one information kiosk contains the following information:</p><p>“Your PDA contains every email, log and info kiosk note you find onboard. It</p><p>also contains an automatic note-taking utility, which keeps you informed of</p><p>pressing tasks while onboard. You can access the PDA by left clicking on the</p><p>Log icon on the right info bar.” Very soon after reading this message, you</p><p>find a log on a nearby body with a code in it that you need to get through the</p><p>next door. Thanks to the Information Kiosk, you know how to access the log</p><p>and the needed code. During the early episodes, you gain a wide variety of</p><p>such situated information from these kiosks, though you can pass them by if</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 132</p><p>133v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>you feel you don’t need any more information and know how to use the basic</p><p>controls of the game. In essence, a game manual has been spread throughout</p><p>the early episodes of the game, giving information when it can be best under-</p><p>stood and practiced through situated experience.</p><p>Dr. Polito’s early messages also give you situated information about how</p><p>to play the game, and clues about the basic story. For example, when you</p><p>find a power cell on the ground, she sends you a message (which you hear</p><p>orally, thanks to your cyber-enhancements, and which is also written in a lit-</p><p>tle box on the screen) that tells you that the power cell is dead but that there</p><p>should be a recharger nearby. She then says, “Just use it and it will recharge</p><p>all the power-driven devices in your possession.” After you have recharged</p><p>the cell, Dr. Polito tells you that you can open a nearby airlock door by</p><p>plugging the recharged power cell into the power unit associated with the</p><p>door. She then says, “Be quick about it, the vacuum seals won’t hold up</p><p>much longer.” (Since this is the first episode, even if you are clumsy and</p><p>slow, you will still make it.)</p><p>When you do get out of the decompressing chamber—before all the</p><p>oxygen is gone—Dr. Polito praises you and rewards you with cybernetic</p><p>modules with which you can upgrade your skills and stats. She explains how</p><p>to do this at upgrade units that just happen to be in the very next room. She</p><p>also tells you to use your cybernetic modules carefully, that they are “hard to</p><p>come by.” In fact, she only gives you four modules, and you cannot upgrade</p><p>much with these. Thus even at the outset you must choose very carefully</p><p>what new skills or stats you want and then build on these.</p><p>Dr. Polito then gives you further messages that help you on your way to</p><p>find her. Of course, things don’t always work out as she says—for example,</p><p>XERXES has shut down the main elevator and closed certain exits. In these</p><p>cases, you and Dr. Polito have to change strategies and seek for new ways to</p><p>proceed. As you move on, things get progressively harder. You eventually</p><p>face enemies—zombies—that try to (and can) kill you. You engage in your</p><p>first fights, using strategies available to your character type and based on the</p><p>choices you have made about skills and statistics.</p><p>These early fights are easier than ones to follow, allowing you to ex-</p><p>plore different strategies and get better at your chosen strategies, so that</p><p>you can handle the more difficult battles. The game stays at the outer edge</p><p>of what I called in chapter 3, the player’s “regime of competence.” Things</p><p>are challenging, but not undoable. And, of course, you learn to save the</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 133</p><p>134 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>game at crucial points, so when you do die, you don’t have to start all over</p><p>again, just from the last saved point.</p><p>The early episodes of System Shock 2 also engage a number of other</p><p>learning principles that are typical of good video games. First of all, such</p><p>games order the sorts of situations and problems with which they confront</p><p>the player. It’s not just that easier ones come earlier. Even more crucially, ear-</p><p>lier situations and problems are designed to lead a player to discover and</p><p>practice fruitful patterns and generalizations in regard to skills and strategies.</p><p>These patterns and generalizations turn out to be useful ones both for play-</p><p>ing the rest of the game and as the basis for more complicated patterns and</p><p>generalizations later when one faces more complex situations and problems.</p><p>Too often in school—especially in progressive pedagogies that stress im-</p><p>mersing children in rich activities without a good deal of teacher guidance—</p><p>children confront cases early in their learning</p><p>that are not very helpful. Since</p><p>the children are in a rich environment with little guidance, nothing stops them</p><p>from starting with complex cases rather than easier and more basic ones. Such</p><p>complex cases, thanks to the fact that all children are powerful pattern recog-</p><p>nizers, often lead children to hit on interesting patterns and generalizations</p><p>that are, in fact “garden paths.” Such garden-path patterns and generalizations</p><p>are not fruitful for the future, however interesting and even intelligent they are</p><p>for the present. In fact, they may very well lead children to miss easier, more</p><p>basic and useful patterns and generalizations that would have facilitated finding</p><p>the correct patterns and generalizations later for more complex cases.</p><p>The issue here is not starting children (or game players, for that matter)</p><p>with easy cases. The issue is starting them with cases that are basic or funda-</p><p>mental in the sense that they lead the learner to discover and practice what</p><p>are, in fact, fruitful patterns and generalizations. Fruitful patterns and gener-</p><p>alizations are ones that allow the learner to make real progress in the domain</p><p>and that can serve as the correct basis for more complicated patterns and</p><p>generalizations that need to be discovered later by confronting more com-</p><p>plex and less basic situations and cases.</p><p>To take a simple example from System Shock 2, consider that the first en-</p><p>emies one confronts are zombies that can be killed by whacking them with a</p><p>crowbar. When the player later discovers that more powerful enemies are not</p><p>easily killed by using the crowbar, he or she quickly hits on a strategy of using</p><p>the crowbar to kill easier enemies, saving better weapons (and weapons wear</p><p>out in this game) and ammunition for more powerful ones.</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 134</p><p>135v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>But now suppose the first enemies confronted were, say, the cyber-assas-</p><p>sins that leap and jump away from the player and shoot arrows from afar</p><p>while hiding behind objects. Not only would this frustrate the player early in</p><p>the game before he or she had developed much skill, but the player also</p><p>would have to use sophisticated weapons and movements. Should the player</p><p>learn how to engage in such tactics and then apply them to zombies—ene-</p><p>mies that are less powerful but that, in our current hypothesis, the player is</p><p>seeing later, after he or she has learned to deal with the cyber-assassins—then</p><p>the player will surely kill them, but will waste weapons and ammunition that</p><p>are in short supply. The player will feel successful and powerful. But this</p><p>strategy ultimately will lead him or her to a dead end when confronted with</p><p>other creatures more powerful than the zombies when the player is low on</p><p>good weapons or ammunition.</p><p>This is an all-too-simple case. In fact, games like System Shock 2 design</p><p>their early situations and problems in a quite sophisticated way to lead to</p><p>fruitful learning. When later the player is confronted by harder situations</p><p>and problems, he or she has just the right basis on which to make fruitful</p><p>guesses about what to do. This is not to say that these situations and prob-</p><p>lems are not hard or that the player hits on the “right” answers quickly or</p><p>without a good deal of thought and effort. (Remember, in a good video game</p><p>there are always several different “right” answers.) It’s just that the harder sit-</p><p>uations and problems are not, in fact, impossible, as they too often are in</p><p>school when children confront them with no basis or a very misleading one.</p><p>(Moral for teachers: Order your cases to subserve fruitful generalizations.)</p><p>Good video games do more than order the situations and problems the</p><p>player faces in an intelligent way, at least in the early parts of the game. They</p><p>also offer the player, in the early episodes, what I call a concentrated sample. By</p><p>this I mean that they concentrate in the early parts of the game an ample</p><p>number of the most fundamental or basic artifacts and tools the player needs</p><p>to learn to use and actions the player needs to learn.</p><p>This is much like creating a foreign language classroom in which the</p><p>teacher concentrates the most fundamental words, phrases, and grammatical</p><p>forms into the early lessons. These words, phrases, and grammatical forms ap-</p><p>pear in this classroom sample more often and more concentrated together</p><p>than they would be in the “real world.” This allows the learner to overpractice</p><p>the most basic and central parts of the language’s vocabulary and grammar,</p><p>setting a good foundation for later learning and learning in the real world.</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 135</p><p>136 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>To take one simple example: Finding and using health kits, or otherwise</p><p>getting healed, is an important part of many shooter games. These kits heal</p><p>the damage the player’s character has sustained thus far in the game, return-</p><p>ing the character to full health or, at least, giving back health. Shooter games</p><p>are usually generous with health kits early on, allowing their discovery and</p><p>use to become rather routine and allowing the player lots of health with</p><p>which to learn by exploring and taking risks in the early part of the game.</p><p>Later they become much more scarce, but by then the player has become</p><p>adept at finding and using them.</p><p>Many times the early parts of games are replete with things to find,</p><p>places and situations to explore, and things to do that teach players the range</p><p>or types of artifacts to be discovered, places and spaces to be encountered,</p><p>and actions to be expected. Players gain a good “feel” for the game and its</p><p>controls. By the time they get past the early parts, they are more adept and</p><p>ready for more advanced learning. Further, against a background of knowing</p><p>what is normal or to be expected, players can assess and reason well about</p><p>new and more special cases they encounter later.</p><p>What all this means is that good video games have a special way of deal-</p><p>ing with what we would call in school the basics. When players start a new</p><p>genre of game—say a real-time strategy game after having played only</p><p>shooter games—they have no way of knowing what is a basic skill and what is</p><p>a more advanced one. They don’t yet know which skills will be used over and</p><p>over and combined with others to make more complex skills.</p><p>Players discover what are basic skills “bottom up” by playing the game</p><p>and others like it. Things they use and do repeatedly and combine in various</p><p>ways turn out to be basic skills in the genre—and these things are different in</p><p>different genres. Ironically, by the time new players are aware of what are</p><p>basic skills in a given type of game—what are the basic elements that are used</p><p>repeatedly and combined and often concentrated in the earlier episodes—</p><p>they have already mastered them. Players come to realize that basic skills are</p><p>simply the most common genre features of a game, learned by playing the</p><p>game. For example, the player learns that finding and using health kits (re-</p><p>gardless of what form they take) is a basic skill (and genre feature) in a</p><p>shooter game (and does not exist in “realistic” military games, like Operation</p><p>Flashpoint, where one shot maims or kills you for good).</p><p>But basic skills can be learned by playing the game—and not through de-</p><p>contextualized skill and drill—because the games are well designed in the</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 136</p><p>137v TELLING AND DOING v</p><p>ways in which they construct their training modules and early episodes and in</p><p>the ways in which they order cases and concentrate their samples early on.</p><p>Neither players of games nor children in school can learn by “playing” (i.e.,</p><p>immersion in rich activities) if they are forced to operate in poorly designed</p><p>spaces.</p><p>And the real world—that is, the world without game designers or good</p><p>teachers, themselves designers of virtual worlds in classrooms—is not in and</p><p>of itself well designed for learning. Leaving children to the mercies of the</p><p>real world by just letting them loose to think and explore is not education.</p><p>LEARNING</p><p>PRINCIPLES</p><p>The discussion has suggested a variety of learning principles that are built</p><p>into good video games. Here I bring these principles together. As in earlier</p><p>chapters, the order of the principles is not important. And, once again, I in-</p><p>tend each principle to be relevant both to learning in video games and learn-</p><p>ing in content areas in classrooms.</p><p>23. Subset Principle</p><p>Learning even at its start takes place in a (simplified) subset of the</p><p>real domain.</p><p>24. Incremental Principle</p><p>Learning situations are ordered in the early stages so that earlier cases</p><p>lead to generalizations that are fruitful for later cases. When learners</p><p>face more complex cases later, the learning space (the number and</p><p>type of guesses the learner can make) is constrained by the sorts of</p><p>fruitful patterns or generalizations the learner has found earlier.</p><p>25. Concentrated Sample Principle</p><p>The learner sees, especially early on, many more instances of funda-</p><p>mental signs and actions than would be the case in a less controlled</p><p>sample. Fundamental signs and actions are concentrated in the early</p><p>stages so that learners get to practice them often and learn them well.</p><p>26. Bottom-up Basic Skills Principle</p><p>Basic skills are not learned in isolation or out of context; rather, what</p><p>counts as a basic skill is discovered bottom up by engaging in more</p><p>and more of the game/domain or game/domains like it. Basic skills</p><p>are genre elements of a given type of game/domain.</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 137</p><p>138 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>27. Explicit Information On-Demand and Just-in-Time Principle</p><p>The learner is given explicit information both on-demand and just-</p><p>in-time, when the learner needs it or just at the point where the in-</p><p>formation can best be understood and used in practice.</p><p>28. Discovery Principle</p><p>Overt telling is kept to a well-thought-out minimum, allowing ample</p><p>opportunity for the learner to experiment and make discoveries.</p><p>29. Transfer Principle</p><p>Learners are given ample opportunity to practice, and support for,</p><p>transferring what they have learned earlier to later problems, includ-</p><p>ing problems that require adapting and transforming that earlier</p><p>learning.</p><p>BIBL IOGRAPHICAL NOTE</p><p>On the issue of telling versus immersion, see the discussion and citations in Gee 2001.</p><p>For further discussion of this issue in relation to learning in real domains and subdo-</p><p>mains of real domains, see Beaufort 1999; Coe, Lingard, & Teslenko 2001; Dias,</p><p>Freedman, Medway, & Pare 1999; Dias, Pare, & Farr 2000. These works are also rel-</p><p>evant to the bottom-up basic skills principle developed in this chapter.</p><p>For accounts of transfer that fit the perspective on learning developed in this</p><p>book, see Beach 1999 and Bransford & Schwartz 1999. The incremental learning</p><p>principle plays an important role in some connectionist models of learning, see, for</p><p>example, Elman 1991a, b; see also Karmiloff-Smith 1992. The explicit information</p><p>“on-demand” and “just-in-time” principle has played a large role in writings on learn-</p><p>ing and thinking in modern workplaces, see Gee, Hull, & Lankshear 1996. On the</p><p>learning principles in this chapter generally, see Gee 1994 and the citations there.</p><p>06 gee ch 5 3/13/03 12:09 PM Page 138</p><p>6</p><p>CULTURAL MODELS:</p><p>DO YOU WANT TO BE THE BLUE SONIC</p><p>OR THE DARK SONIC?</p><p>CONTENT IN VIDEO GAMES</p><p>CHAPTER 2 DISCUSSED A CASE WHERE A GRANDFATHER SAID THAT A</p><p>six-year-old playing Pikmin was wasting his time, because he wasn’t learning</p><p>any “content.” But, of course, video games do have content. RollerCoaster Ty-</p><p>coon, for instance, is about building, maintaining, and making a profit from an</p><p>amusement park. Medal of Honor Allied Assault is about World War II and in-</p><p>cludes an absolutely hair-raising invasion of Omaha Beach, reminiscent of</p><p>the opening scenes of the movie Saving Private Ryan. Civilization III is about</p><p>world history and the dynamics of building and defending a society from the</p><p>ground up. A great many video games, such as Half-Life, Deus Ex, and Red</p><p>Faction, are about conspiracies where powerful and rich people or corpora-</p><p>tions seek to control the world through force and deception. In fact, the con-</p><p>tent of video games is nearly endless.</p><p>One of the things that makes video games so powerful is their ability to</p><p>create whole worlds and invite players to take on various identities within</p><p>them. When players do this, two things can happen: On one hand, their pre-</p><p>supposed perspectives on the world might be reinforced. For example, if</p><p>someone thinks war is heroic, Return to Castle Wolfenstein will not disabuse</p><p>him or her of this viewpoint. If someone thinks that the quality of life is inte-</p><p>grally tied to one’s possessions, The Sims (a best-selling game where you build</p><p>and maintain whole families and neighborhoods) will not disabuse him or her</p><p>of this perspective, either.</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 139</p><p>140 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>On the other hand, through their creation of new and different worlds</p><p>and characters, video games can challenge players’ taken-for-granted views</p><p>about the world. Playing through the invasion of Omaha Beach in Medal of</p><p>Honor Allied Assault gives one a whole new perspective on what a full-scale</p><p>battle is like. The movie Saving Private Ryan did this as well, but the game</p><p>puts the player right in the midst of the action, pinned to the ground, sur-</p><p>rounded by deafening noise and wounded, sometimes shell-shocked, soldiers,</p><p>and facing the near certainty of a quick death if he or she makes one wrong</p><p>move. As players make choices about people, their relationships, and their</p><p>lives in The Sims (and sometimes players have made real people, such as their</p><p>friends, into virtual characters in the game), they may come to realize at a</p><p>conscious level certain values and perspectives they have heretofore taken for</p><p>granted and now wish to reflect on and question.</p><p>This chapter is about the ways in which content in video games either</p><p>reinforces or challenges players’ taken-for-granted perspectives on the world.</p><p>This is an area where the future potential of video games is perhaps even</p><p>more significant than their current instantiations. It is also an area where we</p><p>enter a realm of great controversy, controversy that will get even more in-</p><p>tense as video games come to realize their full potential, for good or ill, for</p><p>realizing worlds and identities.</p><p>SONIC THE HEDGEHOG AND CULTURAL MODELS</p><p>Sonic the Hedgehog—a small, blue, cute hedgehog—is surely the world’s</p><p>fastest, most arrogant, and most famous hedgehog. Originally Sonic was the</p><p>hero in a set of games for the Sega Dreamcast game platform. However, now</p><p>that the Dreamcast has been discontinued, he has shown up on the Nintendo</p><p>GameCube in the game Sonic Adventure 2 Battle. Sonic can run really really</p><p>fast. He can go even faster—like a blurry blue bomb—when he rolls into a</p><p>ball. Either way, he can race around and through obstacles, dash into ene-</p><p>mies, and streak through the landscape, leaping high in the air over walls and</p><p>barriers.</p><p>The back story for Sonic Adventure 2 Battle is that the sinister Dr.</p><p>Eggman, while searching the remnants of his grandfather’s laboratory, un-</p><p>covers a dark form of his arch-nemesis, Sonic, namely a black hedgehog</p><p>named Shadow. Together the two conspire to unleash the Eclipse Cannon, a</p><p>weapon of mass destruction. The government, unable to tell the blue Sonic</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 140</p><p>141v CULTURAL MODELS v</p><p>from the dark Shadow (they look alike) arrests Sonic for Shadow’s evil do-</p><p>ings. Sonic escapes and has to free the world of Dr. Eggman and Shadow’s</p><p>evil to clear his name.</p><p>Players can play Sonic Adventure 2 Battle in two different ways. They can</p><p>be “good” and play as the blue Sonic, or they can be “bad” and play as Sonic’s</p><p>look-alike, Shadow. If they choose Sonic, they play as Sonic, together with his</p><p>friends Knuckles (a boy echidna) and Tails (a boy squirrel), trying to stop Dr.</p><p>Eggman and Shadow from taking over the world. If they choose Shadow, they</p><p>play as Shadow, together</p><p>with his friends Rouge (a girl bat) and Dr. Eggman,</p><p>trying to destroy the world. Players can switch back and forth, playing part of</p><p>the Sonic quest and then changing to play part of the Shadow quest.</p><p>The six-year-old from chapter 2 also plays Sonic Adventure 2 Battle.</p><p>When he originally got the game, he first played a few episodes from the</p><p>Sonic quest and then started playing episodes from the Shadow quest. When</p><p>he was playing as Shadow, he commented on the fact that “the bad guy was</p><p>the good guy”—an odd remark. What he meant, of course, is that when you</p><p>are playing as a virtual character in a video game, that character (you) is the</p><p>hero (center) of the story and in that sense the “good guy” no matter how bad</p><p>he or she might be from another perspective. This boy had never before</p><p>played a game where the hero (himself) was, in terms of the story behind the</p><p>virtual world, a bad or evil character.</p><p>Of course, video games are just as easy to design to allow you to play a</p><p>sinner as a saint. Indeed, this fact has generated a good deal of controversy.</p><p>While the video game world is replete with heroes who destroy evil, it also</p><p>contains games where you can be a mob boss, a hired assassin, or a car thief.</p><p>For example, in the notorious Grand Theft Auto 2, you play a budding young</p><p>criminal, striving to make a name for yourself in a near-future world filled</p><p>with drugs, guns, and gang wars. Your city is populated by three different</p><p>gangs, each of which runs a different section of the city. Each gang has a set</p><p>of pay phones that you can use to take on odd jobs stealing cars. The problem</p><p>is that a gang will assign you work only if it respects you. You earn this re-</p><p>spect by driving over to a rival gang’s turf and shooting as many of their</p><p>members as you can. Here you are certainly not a “good guy” in any tradi-</p><p>tional mainstream sense. (Grand Theft Auto 2 was followed by the highly suc-</p><p>cessful sequels Grand Theft Auto III and Grand Theft Auto: Vice City.)</p><p>What our six-year-old discovered was that there are (besides still others)</p><p>two different models of what counts as being or doing “good.” In one model,</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 141</p><p>142 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>what counts as being or doing good is determined by a character’s own goals,</p><p>purposes, and values, as these are shared with a particular social group to</p><p>which he or she belongs. Shadow and his group (Rouge and Dr. Eggman)</p><p>have a set of goals, purposes, and values in terms of which destroying the</p><p>world is their valued goal.</p><p>If you want to play Sonic Adventure 2 Battle from Shadow’s perspective</p><p>you must act, think, and value (while playing) from this perspective, a per-</p><p>spective that makes Shadow “good” or “the hero.” After all, you are fighting</p><p>numerous battles as Shadow and feel delight when winning them and dismay</p><p>when losing them. It would be absolutely pointless to play as Shadow but</p><p>purposely lose battles because you disapprove of his value system. If you</p><p>played that way, Shadow would die quickly in the first episode and you’d</p><p>never see anything else in the Shadow part of the game.</p><p>In the other model, what counts as being and doing good is determined</p><p>by a wider perspective than just a character’s own goals, purposes, and values,</p><p>as these are shared with a particular social group. Rather, what counts is de-</p><p>termined by the values and norms of a “wider society” that contains multiple,</p><p>sometimes competing, groups as well as more or less generalized rules and</p><p>principles about behavior. In terms of this model, Sonic is fighting for social</p><p>order and the survival of the majority, things that are considered good from</p><p>the perspective of many different groups and in terms of rather general prin-</p><p>ciples of right and wrong.</p><p>By “models” of what it means to be and do good, I do not mean “profes-</p><p>sional” philosophical positions on ethics or theological ones on morality. I</p><p>just mean “everyday” people’s conceptions. The first model, which we might</p><p>call the group model, can be captured by something like the following: “I am</p><p>acting like a good person when I am acting in the interests of some group of</p><p>which I am a member and which I value.” The second model, which we</p><p>might call the general model, can be captured by something like this: “I am</p><p>acting like a good person when I am acting according to some general con-</p><p>ception of what is good and bad, a conception that transcends my more nar-</p><p>row group memberships.”</p><p>These two models regularly come into conflict in real life and cause all</p><p>sorts of interesting issues and questions to arise. Some people readily believe</p><p>that their group interests and values are or ought to be the general good.</p><p>Others think that general conceptions of good really just hide the narrow in-</p><p>terests of particular groups in a society that has cloaked them as general</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 142</p><p>143v CULTURAL MODELS v</p><p>goods. Yet other people believe their interests and values represent future,</p><p>rather than present, general conceptions of good and may see going against</p><p>current conceptions of good as a necessary evil for a greater future good.</p><p>And, of course, there are multiple ideas about what general conceptions of</p><p>good and bad are.</p><p>The six-year-old, in playing Sonic Adventure 2 Battle, has been confronted</p><p>with these two models. He has realized that when you act in (or think in terms</p><p>of) the role of someone else (even a hedgehog), this involves not merely taking</p><p>on a new identity but sometimes thinking and valuing from a perspective that</p><p>you or others may think “wrong” from a different perspective. He also has</p><p>learned that experiencing the world from that perspective (in one’s mind or in</p><p>a video game) does not mean that he accepts it in the sense that he wants, in</p><p>his real-world identity, to adopt the values and the actions that this perspective</p><p>underwrites.</p><p>These two models of what it means to be good are examples of what I</p><p>will call cultural models. Cultural models are images, story lines, principles, or</p><p>metaphors that capture what a particular group finds “normal” or “typical” in</p><p>regard to a given phenomenon. By “group” here I mean to single out any-</p><p>thing ranging from small groups to the whole of the human race with every-</p><p>thing in between. Cultural models are not true or false. Rather, they capture,</p><p>and are meant to capture, only a partial view of reality, one that helps groups</p><p>(and humans in general) go about their daily work without a great deal of</p><p>preplanning and conscious thought. After all, if many things were not left on</p><p>“automatic pilot,” we would spend all our time thinking and never acting.</p><p>So, for example, something like “People are good people when they are</p><p>acting so as to help their group (family, church, community, ethnic group,</p><p>state—pick your group)” is a cultural model for many different groups. It is a</p><p>version of what I called the group model of good. Something like “People are</p><p>good when they are acting according to general principles of morality (pick</p><p>your principles)” is another cultural model that many groups use, though they</p><p>may accept different cultural models about what are typical general principles</p><p>of morality. This is a version of what I called the general model of good. And,</p><p>of course, the two models can and sometimes do come into conflict.</p><p>Since cultural models are usually not conscious for people and since peo-</p><p>ple rarely, if ever, try to formulate them definitively and once and for all in</p><p>words, there is no exactly right way to phrase them. If forced to formulate</p><p>them, people will put them into different words in different situations. The</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 143</p><p>144 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>best researchers can do, then, is study people’s behavior and words when they</p><p>are acting as members of a certain sort of group and acting within certain</p><p>sorts of situations and eventually conclude that, given what they do and say,</p><p>they must accept a certain cultural model for a given phenomenon, a cultural</p><p>model we formulate in words the best</p><p>we can. Of course, when they are act-</p><p>ing as members of different groups in different situations they may not act</p><p>according to the cultural model we have hypothesized but in terms of an-</p><p>other one.</p><p>Social groups do not usually pay much overt attention to their cultural</p><p>models, unless one is threatened. Of course, when cultural models are chal-</p><p>lenged or come into conflict with other such models, then they can come to</p><p>people’s conscious awareness (even to the conscious awareness of the group</p><p>as a whole). If someone comes to think that the actions he or she is taking for</p><p>the family’s good conflict with general conceptions of morality (not even nec-</p><p>essarily the person’s own general conceptions), this can give rise to discom-</p><p>fort and conflict, discomfort and conflict that can be resolved in various ways.</p><p>A number of pervasive cultural models about gender have become con-</p><p>scious to people thanks to the fact that these models have been openly chal-</p><p>lenged in society. For example, a cultural model that holds that unmarried</p><p>women are unfulfilled “spinsters” because they do not have families has long</p><p>been challenged by feminists, single women with children, lesbian couples</p><p>with children, and perfectly fulfilled single women with good careers with</p><p>which they are satisfied. Of course, all these people existed before, but as</p><p>long as they did not speak out and make themselves visible, they were easily</p><p>rendered invisible and marginal by traditional cultural models. Once they did</p><p>speak out, those models and the social work they did came to people’s con-</p><p>sciousness and had to be overtly defended or changed.</p><p>The world is full of an endless array of ever-changing cultural models. For</p><p>example, what do you think of a teenage child who tells his or her parents to</p><p>“F_ _ _ off?” Perhaps you apply a model like “Normal teenagers rebel against</p><p>their parents and other authority figures” and are not too concerned. Perhaps</p><p>you apply a model like “Normal children respect their parents” and conclude</p><p>the teenager is out of control. Who is to say what a “normal” or “typical”</p><p>teenager is or does? Different cultural models hold different implications.</p><p>What do you make of a toddler who throws a tantrum when you, in a</p><p>hurry to get your chores done, open a heavy car door that he or she wants to</p><p>try to open, no matter how long it takes? Perhaps you apply a cultural model</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 144</p><p>145v CULTURAL MODELS v</p><p>like “Young children go through sometimes-difficult ‘stages’ in their urge for</p><p>growing self-reliance and independence” and conclude your child and the</p><p>situation you are in is quite “normal.” Perhaps you even encourage the child.</p><p>Or perhaps you apply a model like “Young children are naturally willful and</p><p>selfish and need discipline to learn to get along with and cooperate with oth-</p><p>ers.” Again, you would conclude you have a “normal” child, but one in need</p><p>of discipline.</p><p>When you see a beggar on the street, your first reaction might stem from</p><p>a cultural model like “People are responsible for themselves and when they</p><p>fail it’s their own fault” and go on your way, ignoring the person’s pleas for</p><p>money. Or you might apply a model something like “Down-and-out people</p><p>are victims of problems that have overwhelmed them in a harshly competi-</p><p>tive society” and give the person some money. Or you might apply a model</p><p>like “Giving people money just encourages them to seek more help from oth-</p><p>ers rather than seek to help themselves” and give the beggar an address of a</p><p>foundation that can help him or her get a (probably quite bad) job.</p><p>When you have an argument with someone, do you apply a model some-</p><p>thing like “Arguments are a sort of verbal conflict” (helped along in this case</p><p>by metaphors in our language like “I won the argument” or “I defeated her po-</p><p>sitions”)? When you are in a romantic relationship, do you apply a model</p><p>something like “Relationships are a type of work” (helped along in this case</p><p>by metaphors in our language like “I’ve put a lot of work into this relation-</p><p>ship” or “He has worked hard to be a good lover”)? When you talk about peo-</p><p>ple’s jobs, do you apply a model something like “Working with the mind is</p><p>more valuable to society than working with one’s hands” and find yourself</p><p>valuing even an academic who debates how many angels can sit on the head</p><p>of a pin over your plumber? Perhaps the answer is no in all these cases, in</p><p>which case you operate, at least sometimes and in some places, with different</p><p>cultural models.</p><p>There are several important points to be made about cultural models.</p><p>They are not just in your head. Of course, you store images and patterns in</p><p>your head that represent cultural models, but they are also represented out</p><p>there in the world. For example, the cultural model that said that “Young</p><p>children go through sometimes-difficult ‘stages’ in their urge for growing</p><p>self-reliance and independence” exists in a lot of self-help guides on babies</p><p>and childrearing. The words and images of the magazines, newspapers, and</p><p>other media all around us represent many cultural models. The models also</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 145</p><p>146 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>are represented and acted out in the words and deeds of the people with</p><p>whom we interact and share memberships in various groups.</p><p>Different cultural models are associated with different groups in the</p><p>larger society, though some are also shared widely by many, perhaps all,</p><p>groups in that society. For instance, the cultural model about children going</p><p>through “stages” toward independence is associated more closely (though</p><p>not exclusively) with the modern middle class, and the cultural model that</p><p>said “Young children are naturally willful and selfish and need discipline to</p><p>learn to get along with and cooperate with others” is associated more closely</p><p>(though not exclusively) with the traditional working class.</p><p>Cultural models, which cannot be stated in one definitive way, are stories</p><p>or images of experience that people can tell themselves or simulate in their</p><p>minds, stories and images that represent what they take to be “normal” or</p><p>“typical” cases or situations. In this sense, they are like theories, theories</p><p>about things like children, childrearing, relationships, friendship, being and</p><p>doing good, and everything else. These theories are usually unconscious and</p><p>taken for granted. However, like all theories, even overt ones in science, they</p><p>are not meant to be detailed, blow-by-blow descriptions of reality. Reality is</p><p>too complex to be described accurately in every detail. Rather, cultural mod-</p><p>els and formal theories both are meant to capture general patterns in such a</p><p>way that we can do things in and with the world, whether this is to accom-</p><p>plish a goal with others or to make successful predictions in an experiment.</p><p>Cultural models are picked up as part and parcel of acting with others in</p><p>the world. We act with others and attempt to make sense of what they are</p><p>doing and saying. We interact with the media of our society and attempt to</p><p>make sense of what is said and done there, as well. Cultural models are the</p><p>tacit, taken-for-granted theories we (usually unconsciously) infer and then</p><p>act on in the normal course of events when we want to be like others in our</p><p>social groups. People who have no cultural models would have to think</p><p>everything out for themselves minute by minute when they attempt to act.</p><p>They would be paralyzed. And they certainly would not be social beings,</p><p>since part of what makes us social beings is the set of cultural models we</p><p>share with those around us.</p><p>Cultural models can be used for many different purposes and they can</p><p>sometimes conflict with each other. For example, the anthropological psy-</p><p>chologist Claudia Strauss found that working-class men she studied behaved</p><p>in their daily lives according to what she called a bread-winner model. This</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 146</p><p>147v CULTURAL MODELS v</p><p>model can be phrased something like this: “Men take care of their families</p><p>even</p><p>if this means sacrificing their own interests.” On the other hand, Strauss</p><p>found that many upper-middle class people operate with a cultural model</p><p>that stresses their own self-development over the interests of those around</p><p>them, including their own families. When such people were faced with mov-</p><p>ing to take a new and better job, they often did so, even if this damaged their</p><p>families and relationships. The working-class men Strauss studied, when</p><p>faced with the same choice, gave up the new career opportunity for the bene-</p><p>fit of their families.</p><p>These working-class men also used what Strauss and others have called</p><p>the success model to judge their own behaviors. This model says something</p><p>like “In the United States, anyone can get ahead if they work hard enough.”</p><p>The working-class men saw that they did not hold jobs the wider society</p><p>considered successful and used this model to condemn themselves, saying</p><p>they had not worked hard enough or weren’t smart enough. They used the</p><p>success model to judge themselves negatively even though this model exists</p><p>in some degree of conflict with the bread winner model on which they led</p><p>their lives in action, a model that would not let them take the “selfish” steps</p><p>often required by the success model.</p><p>Since this conflict did not surface to consciousness for these men, it did</p><p>not come out into the open. They simply felt bad about themselves, at least</p><p>when forced to think about themselves in relation to the society as a whole.</p><p>In other settings, of course, they may have felt quite differently—remember,</p><p>people take on different identities in different situations and all people are</p><p>members of many different groups.</p><p>Are cultural models, then, “good” or “bad”? They are good in that they</p><p>allow us to act and be social in the world without having to constantly reflect</p><p>and think. They are bad when they operate so as to do harm to ourselves or</p><p>others but go unexamined. Certain circumstances can, however, force us to</p><p>think overtly and reflectively about our cultural models. We certainly don’t</p><p>want or need to think overtly about all of them. But we do need to think</p><p>about those that, in certain situations or at certain points in our lives, have</p><p>the potential to do more harm than good.</p><p>Sonic Adventure 2 Battle forced the six-year-old overtly to realize and</p><p>confront two different, and sometimes conflicting, cultural models of what</p><p>constitutes being and doing “good.” Of course, this realization was only be-</p><p>ginning. Many other experiences, not the least in video games, will give this</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 147</p><p>148 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>child other opportunities to think more about these two models. And, in-</p><p>deed, they are models that bear a good deal of thinking about, since they have</p><p>done and have the potential to do a lot of harm in the world.</p><p>UNDER ASH</p><p>The sort of thing that the six-year-old experienced can go much further and</p><p>deeper. Consider the case of Arab children. After the terrorist attacks of Sep-</p><p>tember 11, 2001, a number of video games came out, initially on the Internet</p><p>and thereafter as packaged games, featuring U.S. soldiers killing Arabs and</p><p>Muslims. These games, for obvious reasons, were not entirely palatable to</p><p>Arab children. In response, the Syrian publishing house Dar Al-Fikr de-</p><p>signed a video game called Under Ash. Its hero is a young Palestinian named</p><p>Ahmed who throws stones to fight Israeli soldiers and settlers. The game, of</p><p>course, involves the player deeply in the Palestinian cause and Palestinian</p><p>perspectives.</p><p>In the game, Ahmed initially must reach Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa mosque, an</p><p>important Islamic holy site, avoiding or fighting Israeli soldiers and settlers</p><p>along the way. Once he reaches the mosque, Ahmed has to help injured</p><p>Palestinians, find weapons, and expel Israeli soldiers. There are many other</p><p>episodes to the game, including ones where Ahmed infiltrates a Jewish settle-</p><p>ment and where he serves as a guerrilla warrior in southern Lebanon. As is</p><p>typical of such video games, Ahmed only attacks those he does not consider</p><p>“civilians.” (In this case, occupation forces, settlers, and soldiers do not count</p><p>as “civilians.”) “Civilians” (all others) are left unharmed.</p><p>Of course, it is clear that in video games who does and does not count as a</p><p>“civilian” is based on different perspectives embedded in the game’s virtual</p><p>world. I was originally surprised (which shows I was operating with a different</p><p>cultural model) that settlers (since they are not in the army) didn’t count as</p><p>civilians. But then I realized that this game accepts a cultural model in terms</p><p>of which the settlers are seen as the “advance” troops of an occupation army.</p><p>The general manager of the company that produced Under Ash, Adnan</p><p>Salim, considers the game, one that is violent in just the way many U.S.</p><p>shooter games are, “a call for peace.” In an Internet site devoted to the game,</p><p>Salim says that “Slaying and shedding blood have been the worst of the</p><p>Human’s conducts [sic] since the beginning of creation.” I got Salim’s views</p><p>from Google’s (a search engine) cache of www.underash.com/emessage.htm.</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 148</p><p>149v CULTURAL MODELS v</p><p>(A cache is a snapshot that the people at Google took of the page as they</p><p>“crawled the web.”) This site, like several others devoted to Under Ash, no</p><p>longer exits. Opponents of the game have destroyed many sites devoted to it.</p><p>I have no idea whether this was true of this site or not. Salim goes on to say</p><p>that “[i]n spite of the Human’s endeavor and struggle to get rid of the crime</p><p>of murder since he appeared on Earth, Israel has been practicing collective</p><p>killing and eradication.”</p><p>On the other hand, he claims that:</p><p>Under Ash is a call to humanity to stop killing and shedding blood. After all</p><p>its awful experience and global destructive wars, the whole world has be-</p><p>come aware of the fact that wars never solve problems. . . .</p><p>Under Ash is a call to dialogue, coexistence and peace. Justice is the</p><p>deeply-rooted human value that God Almighty enjoined . . . On the other</p><p>hand, nations perish, states stabilize and civilizations collapse according to</p><p>the amount of aggression, injustice and harm they practice. . . .</p><p>Under Ash is a call to justice, realizing truth, preventing wronging [sic]</p><p>and aggression. God made all mankind as equal to each other as the comb</p><p>teeth. . . .</p><p>Such is the philosophy of Under Ash. The idea on which it was based</p><p>repulses violence, injustice, discrimination and murder, and calls for peace,</p><p>justice and equality among people.</p><p>This idea, accompanied by the best available technology, is still handy</p><p>to our youth, trying to dry up their tears; heal their wounds; remove all the</p><p>feelings of humiliation, humbleness and wretchedness from their souls, and</p><p>draw the smile of hope and the sense of dignity and efficiency on their faces.</p><p>If you find these remarks odd in regard to a violent video game (remem-</p><p>ber that there was no outcry in the United States over shooter games where</p><p>the enemies were Arabs), that is because these remarks and the game itself</p><p>take for granted a number of cultural models foreign to many Americans (just</p><p>as American games and remarks about them take for granted different cul-</p><p>tural models). For example, consider that Salim says that, after having experi-</p><p>enced the violence of global wars, the world: “turned back to the patient</p><p>dialogue around the table of negotiation which resulted in the establishment</p><p>of a European Union among nations which previously hated one another and</p><p>went on fighting for centuries. Then they agreed to coexist peacefully within</p><p>a union under whose authority none is harmed and every one benefits.”</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 149</p><p>150 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>One cultural model that seems to be at work here is something like this:</p><p>“The experience of violence will make people seek peace.” In terms of this</p><p>model, we can see the guerrilla fighter as trying to push more powerful enti-</p><p>ties (i.e., states), entities</p><p>of video-game players are middle-age</p><p>women playing video card games alone and together on the Internet. I have</p><p>nothing here to say about card games. That just shows that we academics still</p><p>have much to learn about the “real” world. I guess that’s why we keep trying.</p><p>BIBL IOGRAPHICAL NOTE</p><p>In order not to clutter the text with references, I will not insert references directly</p><p>into the text of each chapter but will instead give citations to the literature in a biblio-</p><p>graphical note at the end of each chapter.</p><p>Poole 2000 and Herz 1996 are good analyses of the design of video games and</p><p>their role in our culture. Poole 2000 discusses the statistics on who plays what video</p><p>games, as well as the fact that the video game industry makes more money in a given</p><p>year than does the movie industry. Kent 2001 is an entertaining history of video</p><p>games. Greenfield 1984 and Loftus and Loftus 1983 are good early discussions of</p><p>the role of learning and thinking in video games. King 2002, prepared for a</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 11</p><p>12 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>museum exhibit on video games, contains a wide array of interesting articles on all</p><p>aspects of the games.</p><p>Pinker 1999 is a good, basic introduction to cognitive science. For more on cog-</p><p>nitive science, especially as it applies to schools and learning, see Bransford, Brown, &</p><p>Cocking 1999; Bruer 1993; Gardner 1991; and Pelligrino, Chudowksy, & Glaser</p><p>2001. These sources discuss work on situated cognition, as well as a number of other</p><p>areas. For additional work on situated cognition, see Brooks 2002; Brown, Collins, &</p><p>Dugid 1989; Clark 1997; Gee 1996; Lave 1988; Lave and Wenger 1991; Rogoff 1990;</p><p>and Tomasello 1999. The fact that botanists and landscape architects classify and</p><p>think about trees differently is taken from Medlin, Lynch, & Coley 1997.</p><p>For a discussion of good, conceptually based science instruction in schools, see</p><p>Bruer 1993; Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt 1997; and diSessa 2000.</p><p>For introductions to the New Literacy Studies, see Barton 1994; Gee 1996; and</p><p>Street 1995. For work on connectionism and the human mind as a pattern recognizer,</p><p>see Clark 1989, 1993; Gee 1996; Margolis 1987, 1993; and Rumelhart, McClelland,</p><p>& the PDP Research Group 1986.</p><p>02 gee ch 1 3/13/03 12:05 PM Page 12</p><p>2</p><p>SEMIOTIC DOMAINS:</p><p>IS PLAYING VIDEO GAMES</p><p>A “WASTE OF T IME”?</p><p>L ITERACY AND SEMIOTIC DOMAINS</p><p>WHEN PEOPLE LEARN TO PLAY VIDEO GAMES, THEY ARE LEARNING</p><p>a new literacy. Of course, this is not the way the word “literacy” is normally</p><p>used. Traditionally, people think of literacy as the ability to read and write.</p><p>Why, then, should we think of literacy more broadly, in regard to video</p><p>games or anything else, for that matter? There are two reasons.</p><p>First, in the modern world, language is not the only important commu-</p><p>nicational system. Today images, symbols, graphs, diagrams, artifacts, and</p><p>many other visual symbols are particularly significant. Thus, the idea of dif-</p><p>ferent types of “visual literacy” would seem to be an important one. For ex-</p><p>ample, being able to “read” the images in advertising is one type of visual</p><p>literacy. And, of course, there are different ways to read such images, ways</p><p>that are more or less aligned with the intentions and interests of the advertis-</p><p>ers. Knowing how to read interior designs in homes, modernist art in muse-</p><p>ums, and videos on MTV are other forms of visual literacy.</p><p>Furthermore, very often today words and images of various sorts are jux-</p><p>taposed and integrated in a variety of ways. In newspaper and magazines as</p><p>well as in textbooks, images take up more and more of the space alongside</p><p>words. In fact, in many modern high school and college textbooks in the sci-</p><p>ences images not only take up more space, they now carry meanings that are</p><p>independent of the words in the text. If you can’t read these images, you will</p><p>not be able to recover their meanings from the words in the text as was more</p><p>usual in the past.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 13</p><p>14 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>In such multimodal texts (texts that mix words and images), the images</p><p>often communicate different things from the words. And the combination of</p><p>the two modes communicates things that neither of the modes does sepa-</p><p>rately. Thus, the idea of different sorts of multimodal literacy seems an im-</p><p>portant one. Both modes and multimodality go far beyond images and words</p><p>to include sounds, music, movement, bodily sensations, and smells.</p><p>None of this news today, of course. We very obviously live in a world</p><p>awash with images. It is our first answer to the question why we should think</p><p>of literacy more broadly. The second answer is this: Even though reading and</p><p>writing seem so central to what literacy means traditionally, reading and writ-</p><p>ing are not such general and obvious matters as they might at first seem.</p><p>After all, we never just read or write; rather, we always read or write something</p><p>in some way.</p><p>There are many different ways of reading and writing. We don’t read or</p><p>write newspapers, legal tracts, essays in literary criticism, poetry, rap songs,</p><p>and on through a nearly endless list in the same way. Each of these domains</p><p>has its own rules and requirements. Each is a culturally and historically sepa-</p><p>rate way of reading and writing, and, in that sense, a different literacy. Fur-</p><p>thermore, in each case, if we want to “break the rules” and read against the</p><p>grain of the text—for the purposes of critique, for instance—we have to do so</p><p>in different ways, usually with some relatively deep knowledge of how to read</p><p>such texts “according to the rules.”</p><p>So there are different ways to read different types of texts. Literacy is</p><p>multiple, then, in the sense that the legal literacy needed for reading law</p><p>books is not the same as the literacy needed for reading physics texts or su-</p><p>perhero comic books. And we should not be too quick to dismiss the latter</p><p>form of literacy. Many a superhero comic is replete with post-Freudian irony</p><p>of a sort that would make a modern literary critic’s heart beat fast and confuse</p><p>any otherwise normal adult. Literacy, then, even as traditionally conceived to</p><p>involve only print, is not a unitary thing but a multiple matter. There are,</p><p>even in regard to printed texts and even leaving aside images and multimodal</p><p>texts, different “literacies.”</p><p>Once we see this multiplicity of literacy (literacies), we realize that when</p><p>we think about reading and writing, we have to think beyond print. Reading</p><p>and writing in any domain, whether it is law, rap songs, academic essays, su-</p><p>perhero comics, or whatever, are not just ways of decoding print, they are</p><p>also caught up with and in social practices. Literacy in any domain is actually</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 14</p><p>15v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>not worth much if one knows nothing about the social practices of which that</p><p>literacy is but a part. And, of course, these social practices involve much more</p><p>than just an engagement with print.</p><p>One can know a good deal about a social practice—such as arguing be-</p><p>fore the Supreme Court, carrying out an experiment in nuclear physics, or</p><p>memorializing an event in gang history through graffiti—without actually</p><p>being able to participate in the social practice. But knowing about a social</p><p>practice always involves recognizing various distinctive ways of acting, inter-</p><p>acting, valuing, feeling, knowing, and using various objects and technologies</p><p>that constitute the social practice.</p><p>Take something so simple as the following sentence about basketball:</p><p>“The guard dribbled down court, held up two fingers, and passed to the open</p><p>man.” You may very well know what every word in this sentence means in</p><p>terms of dictionary definitions, but you cannot read the sentence with any real</p><p>worthwhile understanding unless you can recognize, in some sense (perhaps</p><p>only in simulations in your mind), guards, dribbling, basketballs, open men,</p><p>and basketball courts. But to be able to recognize these things is already to</p><p>know a</p><p>that the guerrilla cannot defeat outright, to settle</p><p>their differences through negotiation rather than war. A cultural model some-</p><p>thing like “The experience of overwhelming violence will make less powerful</p><p>entities give up and give in to more powerful entities” seems at play in both</p><p>some U.S. video games and much U.S. media devoted to warfare in the mod-</p><p>ern world. Note that like all cultural models, these are not “true” or “false.”</p><p>(History is replete with examples and counter-examples to both.) They are</p><p>meant to help people make sense to themselves and others and to engage in</p><p>joint activity with others with whom they share these cultural models.</p><p>Now, you might very well not want to play Under Ash. If you did play the</p><p>game, you would be placed in a situation where you took on the virtual iden-</p><p>tity of a character whose cultural models about many things are different</p><p>from yours. If you not only adopted this virtual identity while you played but</p><p>took on what I called in chapter 3 a projective identity vis-à-vis your virtual</p><p>identity (Ahmed), you would surely come to understand what it feels like to</p><p>be among those angry young people who are “trying to dry up their tears;</p><p>heal their wounds; remove all the feelings of humiliation, humbleness and</p><p>wretchedness from their souls, and draw the smile of hope and the sense of</p><p>dignity and efficiency on their faces.”</p><p>Would this mean you would, all of a sudden, want to kill Israeli settlers or</p><p>even that you would support the Palestinian cause over the Israeli one if you had</p><p>not before? Certainly not. But it would mean that, far more interactively that</p><p>you could in any novel or movie, you would have experienced the “other” from</p><p>the inside. Even more interesting, since the cultural models built into the game</p><p>are not yours, you would be able to reflect on them in a more overtly conscious</p><p>way than young Arabic players for whom the models are taken for granted (as</p><p>U.S. game players take for granted different models that fit their own sense of</p><p>reality). In turn, this might make you contrast these models to ones you have</p><p>taken for granted and bring them to consciousness for reflection.</p><p>What if Under Ash allowed you to play through the game twice, once as</p><p>Ahmed and once as an Israeli settler, just as Sonic Adventure 2 Battle allows</p><p>you to be Sonic or Shadow, or Aliens vs. Predator 2 allows you to be a Marine</p><p>fighting off the Aliens and Predator or either an Alien or Predator trying to</p><p>survive by killing the Marines? My guess is that if you had taken on both the</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 150</p><p>151v CULTURAL MODELS v</p><p>projective identity of you as Ahmed and you as Israeli settler, you would find</p><p>the whole thing much more complex than you do now and would be a bit</p><p>more reluctant to take the death of either side for granted. Such complexity</p><p>is bad, I admit, for people and states trying to wage war.</p><p>Video games have an unmet potential to create complexity by letting</p><p>people experience the world from different perspectives. Part of this poten-</p><p>tial is that in a video game, you yourself have to act as a given character. As</p><p>you act quickly, and not just think leisurely, and as you (while playing) cele-</p><p>brate the character’s victories and bemoan his or her defeats, you must live in</p><p>a virtual world and make sense of it. This making sense of the virtual world</p><p>amid not just thought but also action in the world amounts to experiencing</p><p>new and different cultural models. Furthermore, you may experience these</p><p>models much more consciously—and render some of your own previous</p><p>models conscious by contrast in the process—than is typical of our daily lives</p><p>in the real world. In the next section I turn to an example that is less esoteric</p><p>for Americans than Under Ash.</p><p>I am well aware that this potential of video games—if and when it is more</p><p>fully realized—is liable to be very controversial. An Israeli or Palestinian who</p><p>has lost a loved one to violence is not going to want to play both sides of my</p><p>make-believe Under Ash game. Indeed, the Israeli and Palestinian may each</p><p>revel in playing “their” side and getting virtual revenge. Each may think it im-</p><p>moral to “play” the other side, to take on such a perspective on the world even</p><p>in play. I, too, think that certain perspectives are so repugnant that we should</p><p>not take them even in play. But who decides? And if we are willing to take</p><p>none but our own side, even in play, then violence would seem inevitable.</p><p>We do not have to imagine games that most of us would find entirely re-</p><p>pugnant, regardless of our political perspectives. Such games actually exist.</p><p>For example, a game called Ethnic Cleansing, put out by the Virginia-based</p><p>National Alliance, has players killing African Americans, Latinos, and Jews as</p><p>they run through gritty ghetto and subway environments. The game is quite</p><p>sophisticated technologically. (It was built using free game development soft-</p><p>ware called Genesis 3D.) Hate groups like the National Alliance have long</p><p>recruited members through the use of web sites, white-power music, and</p><p>books and magazines. However, there is concern, for just the reasons we have</p><p>discussed, that interactive media like video games are a more powerful device</p><p>than such passive media. But if they are, then they are potentially more pow-</p><p>erful for both good and ill.</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 151</p><p>152 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>Whether we like it or not, new technologies make it easy to design real-</p><p>istic and sophisticated video games that allow players to be almost any sort of</p><p>person or being living in almost in sort of world that any designer can imag-</p><p>ine. Eventually this capacity will be used to allow people to live and interact</p><p>in worlds where violence plays no role and is replaced by conversation and</p><p>other sorts of social interactions. (The Longest Journey, a game whose lead</p><p>character is an 18-year-old woman named April Ryan, is one such game;</p><p>Siberia, whose protagonist is a female lawyer wandering around a town full of</p><p>automatons, is another.)</p><p>The same capacity that will allow us to enact new identities and learn to</p><p>act according to new cultural models can also allow us to renew our hate or</p><p>even learn new models of hate. In the end, who is to decide what identities</p><p>you or I can enact and whether enacting them will be a good or bad thing for</p><p>us? Publicly the issue usually is couched in terms of children and teens,</p><p>where parents surely bear a major responsibility, but the average video-game</p><p>player is in his or her late 20s or early 30s. I don’t want politicians dictating</p><p>what identities I can enact in a virtual world. At the same time, I worry about</p><p>people who play Ethnic Cleansing. But any attempt to stop the flow of identi-</p><p>ties that new technologies allow presents the danger of locking everyone into</p><p>their most cherished identities, and that has brought us a great deal of ethnic</p><p>cleansing of its own. I have no solid answers to offer, only the claim that</p><p>video games have the potential to raise many such questions and issues.</p><p>GOING TO WAR</p><p>Both Return to Castle Wolfenstein and Operation Flashpoint: Cold War Crisis are</p><p>shooter games played out in military settings. Castle Wolfenstein is a first-per-</p><p>son shooter. (You see only the weapon you are holding, unless you look in</p><p>something like a mirror when you then see yourself.) Operation Flashpoint can</p><p>be played either in the first-person or in the third-person (where you see</p><p>your character’s body as if you were just a bit behind him). In Castle Wolfen-</p><p>stein you play Major B. J. Blazkowitz in World War II fighting against the</p><p>Nazis. In Operation Flashpoint you start the game as Private David Armstrong,</p><p>though you (Armstrong) go up in rank during the game. Private Armstrong is</p><p>involved as a U.S. soldier representing NATO in a war against a resistance</p><p>movement on an island nation.</p><p>07 gee ch 6 3/13/03 12:10 PM Page 152</p><p>153v CULTURAL MODELS v</p><p>While all this makes these two games sound similar, they are in a great</p><p>many respects entirely different. In Return</p><p>good deal about basketball as a game, that is, as a particular sort of so-</p><p>cial practice. The same thing is equally true about any sentence or text about</p><p>the law, comic books, a branch of science, or anything else for that matter.</p><p>We can go further. One’s understanding of the sentence “The guard</p><p>dribbled down court, held up two fingers, and passed to the open man” is dif-</p><p>ferent—in some sense, deeper and better—the more one knows and can rec-</p><p>ognize about the social practice (game) of basketball. For example, if you</p><p>know a good bit about basketball, you may see that one possible meaning of</p><p>this sentence is that the guard signaled a particular play by holding up two</p><p>fingers and then passed to the player the play left momentarily unguarded.</p><p>But then this brings us to another important point. While you don’t need</p><p>to be able to enact a particular social practice (e.g., play basketball or argue</p><p>before a court) to be able to understand texts from or about that social prac-</p><p>tice, you can potentially give deeper meanings to those texts if you can. This</p><p>claim amounts to arguing that producers (people who can actually engage in</p><p>a social practice) potentially make better consumers (people who can read or</p><p>understand texts from or about the social practice).</p><p>A corollary of this claim is this: Writers (in the sense of people who can</p><p>write texts that are recognizably part of a particular social practice) potentially</p><p>make better readers (people who can understand texts from or about a given</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 15</p><p>16 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>social practice). Note that by “writers” here I do not mean people who can</p><p>just write down words appropriate to a particular practice such as field biol-</p><p>ogy. I mean people who can write a text that field biologists would recognize</p><p>as an acceptable text within their family of social practices.</p><p>Why do I say “potentially” here? Because there is a paradox about pro-</p><p>ducers. On one hand, producers are deeply enough embedded in their social</p><p>practices that they can understand the texts associated with those practices</p><p>quite well. On the other hand, producers are often so deeply embedded in</p><p>their social practices that they take the meanings and values of the texts asso-</p><p>ciated with those practices for granted in an unquestioning way. One key</p><p>question for deep learning and good education, then, is how to get producer-</p><p>like learning and knowledge, but in a reflective and critical way.</p><p>All these claims are pretty obvious. It is, thus, fascinating that they are so</p><p>often ignored in schools. In school, many times children are expected to read</p><p>texts with little or no knowledge about any social practices within which those</p><p>texts are used. They are rarely allowed to engage in an actual social practice in</p><p>ways that are recognizable to “insiders” (e.g., field biologists) as meaningful</p><p>and acceptable, before and as they read texts relevant to the practice.</p><p>Indeed, children are regularly given reading tests that ask general, fac-</p><p>tual, and dictionarylike questions about various texts with no regard for the</p><p>fact that these texts fall into different genres (i.e., they are different kinds of</p><p>texts) connected to different sorts of social practices. Children often can an-</p><p>swer such questions, but they learn and know nothing about the genres and</p><p>social practices that are, in the end, the heart and soul of literacy.</p><p>Schools will continue to operate this way until they (and reading tests)</p><p>move beyond fixating on reading as silently saying the sounds of letters and</p><p>words and being able to answer general, factual, and dictionarylike questions</p><p>about written texts. You do have to silently say the sounds of letters and</p><p>words when you read (or, at least, this greatly speeds up reading). You do</p><p>have do be able to answer general, factual, and dictionarylike questions about</p><p>what you read: This means you know the “literal” meaning of the text. But</p><p>what so many people—unfortunately so many educators and policymakers—</p><p>fail to see is that if this is all you can do, then you can’t really read. You will fail</p><p>to be able to read well and appropriately in contexts associated with specific</p><p>types of texts and specific types of social practices.</p><p>For example, consider once again our sentence about basketball: “The</p><p>guard dribbled down court, held up two fingers, and passed to the open</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 16</p><p>17v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>man.” A typical reading test would ask a question like this: “What did the</p><p>guard do to the ball?” and give “bounce it” as one of the choices. Unfortu-</p><p>nately, you can answer such general, factual, dictionarylike questions and re-</p><p>ally have no idea what the sentence means in the domain of basketball. When</p><p>we see that the same thing applies to sentences from science or any other</p><p>school subject, we immediately see why so many children pass early reading</p><p>tests but cannot learn later on in the subject areas.</p><p>This phenomenon is so pervasive that it has been given a name by re-</p><p>searchers: “the fourth-grade slump.” It is called this because, in the past, the</p><p>first three years of school were largely devoted to learning to read (in the</p><p>sense of being able to decode print and get the literal meanings of texts), and</p><p>fourth grade was where children began to read to learn (in the subject areas).</p><p>However, very often today children are being asked to read to learn things like</p><p>science and math from first or second grade on, at least in affluent schools.</p><p>However, let’s leave school aside, and return to our main question as to</p><p>why we should be willing to broaden how we talk about literacy. I can now</p><p>note that talking about literacy and literacies in this expanded, nontraditional</p><p>way (as multiple and connected to social practices) leads us at once to an in-</p><p>teresting dilemma: What do we want to say of someone, for instance, who</p><p>can understand and even compose rap songs (words and music), but cannot</p><p>read or write language or musical notation?</p><p>Of course, in traditional terms, this person is illiterate in terms of both</p><p>language and musical notation. But yet he or she is able to understand and</p><p>compose in a language style that is distinctively different from everyday lan-</p><p>guage and in a musical form that is distinctively different from other forms of</p><p>music. We might want to say that the person is literate in the domain of rap</p><p>songs (as a distinctive domain combining language and music in certain char-</p><p>acteristic ways), though the person is not print literate or musical-notation</p><p>literate.</p><p>Cases like this display the limitations of thinking about literacy first and</p><p>foremost in terms of print. We need, rather, to think first in terms of what I</p><p>call semiotic domains and only then get to literacy in the more traditional</p><p>terms of print literacy. “Semiotic” here is just a fancy way of saying we want</p><p>to talk about all sorts of different things that can take on meaning, such as</p><p>images, sounds, gestures, movements, graphs, diagrams, equations, objects,</p><p>even people like babies, midwives, and mothers, and not just words. All of</p><p>these things are signs (symbols, representations, whatever term you want to</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 17</p><p>18 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>use) that “stand for” (take on) different meanings in different situations, con-</p><p>texts, practices, cultures, and historical periods. For example, the image of a</p><p>cross means Christ (or Christ’s death) in the context of Christian social prac-</p><p>tices, and it means the four points of the compass (north, south, west, and</p><p>east) in the context of other social practices (e.g., in some African religions).</p><p>By a semiotic domain I mean any set of practices that recruits one or</p><p>more modalities (e.g., oral or written language, images, equations, symbols,</p><p>sounds, gestures, graphs, artifacts, etc.) to communicate distinctive types of</p><p>meanings. Here are some examples of semiotic domains: cellular biology,</p><p>postmodern literary criticism, first-person-shooter video games, high-fash-</p><p>ion advertisements, Roman</p><p>Catholic theology, modernist painting, mid-</p><p>wifery, rap music, wine connoisseurship—through a nearly endless, motley,</p><p>and ever-changing list.</p><p>Our sentence about basketball—“The guard dribbled down court, held</p><p>up two fingers, and passed to the open man”—is a sentence from the semiotic</p><p>domain of basketball. It might seen odd to call basketball a semiotic domain.</p><p>However, in basketball, particular words, actions, objects, and images take on</p><p>distinctive meanings. In basketball, “dribble” does not mean drool; a pick (an</p><p>action where an offensive player positions him or herself so as to block a de-</p><p>fensive player guarding one of his or her teammates) means that some defen-</p><p>sive player must quickly switch to guard the now-unguarded offensive player;</p><p>and the wide circle on each end of the court means that players who shoot</p><p>from beyond it get three points instead of two if they score a basket.</p><p>If you don’t know these meanings—cannot read these signs—then you</p><p>can’t “read” (understand) basketball. The matter seems fairly inconsequential</p><p>when we are talking about basketball. However, it quickly seems more conse-</p><p>quential when we are talking about the semiotic domain of some type of sci-</p><p>ence being studied in school. Equally here, if you don’t know how to read the</p><p>distinctive signs (words, actions, objects, and images), you can’t read (under-</p><p>stand) that sort of science.</p><p>If we think first in terms of semiotic domains and not in terms of reading</p><p>and writing as traditionally conceived, we can say that people are (or are not)</p><p>literate (partially or fully) in a domain if they can recognize (the equivalent of</p><p>“reading”) and/or produce (the equivalent of “writing”) meanings in the do-</p><p>main. We can reserve the term “print literate” for talking about people who</p><p>can read and/or write a language like English or Russian, though here, still,</p><p>we will want to insist that there are different ways to read and write different</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 18</p><p>19v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>things connected to different social practices so, in that sense, there are mul-</p><p>tiple print literacies. Thus, the rap artist who could understand and compose</p><p>rap songs but not read print or musical notation is literate in the semiotic do-</p><p>main of rap music but not print literate.</p><p>In the modern world, print literacy is not enough. People need to be lit-</p><p>erate in a great variety of different semiotic domains. If these domains in-</p><p>volve print, people often need the print bits, of course. However, the vast</p><p>majority of domains involve semiotic (symbolic, representational) resources</p><p>besides print and some don’t involve print as a resource at all. Furthermore,</p><p>and more important, people need to be able to learn to be literate in new</p><p>semiotic domains throughout their lives. If our modern, global, high-tech,</p><p>and science-driven world does anything, it certainly gives rise to new semi-</p><p>otic domains and transforms old ones at an ever faster rate.</p><p>This book deals with video games as a semiotic domain, actually as a</p><p>family of related, but different domains, since there are different types or</p><p>genres of video games (e.g., first-person shooter games, fantasy role-playing</p><p>games, real-time strategy games, simulation games, etc.). People can be liter-</p><p>ate, or not, in one or more of these video-game semiotic domains. However,</p><p>in talking about learning and literacy in regard to video games, I hope to de-</p><p>velop, as well, a perspective on learning, literacy, and semiotic domains that</p><p>applies more generally to domains beyond video games.</p><p>However, if we want to take video games seriously as a family of semiotic</p><p>domains in which one can learn to be literate, we face an immediate problem.</p><p>Many people who don’t play video games, especially older people, are sure to</p><p>say that playing video games is “a waste of time.” In the next section, I sketch</p><p>out one version of what I think this claim often amounts to, using a specific</p><p>example involving a six year old child.</p><p>LEARNING AND THE PROBLEM OF CONTENT</p><p>To spell out what I think the claim that playing video games is a waste of time</p><p>often means, I need first to tell you about the game the six-year-old boy was</p><p>playing, a game called “Pikmin.” Pikmin is a game for the Nintendo Game-</p><p>Cube, rated “E,” a game acceptable for all ages.</p><p>In Pikmin, the player takes on the role of Captain Olimar, a small (he’s</p><p>about the size of an American quarter), bald, big-eared, bulbous-nosed space-</p><p>man who crashes into an unfamiliar planet when a comet hits his spaceship.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 19</p><p>20 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>Captain Olimar (i.e., the player) must collect the spaceship’s lost parts, scat-</p><p>tered throughout the planet, while relying on his spacesuit to protect him</p><p>from the planet’s poisonous atmosphere. Thus, the player must carefully</p><p>monitor the damage done to Captain Olimar’s suit and repair it when</p><p>needed. To make matters more complicated, the spacesuit’s life support will</p><p>fail after 30 days, so the captain (the player) must find all the missing parts in</p><p>30 days (each day is 15 minutes of game-time play). So the game is a race</p><p>against time and represents the rare case of a game that one can play to the</p><p>end and still “lose.”</p><p>However, Captain Olimar gets help. Soon after arriving on the strange</p><p>planet, he comes upon native life that is willing to aid him. Sprouts dispensed</p><p>from a large onionlike creature yield tiny (they’re even smaller than Captain</p><p>Olimar) cute creatures that Olimar names “Pikmin” after a carrot from his</p><p>home planet. These little creatures appear to be quite taken with Olimar and</p><p>follow his directions without question. Captain Olimar learns to raise Pikmin</p><p>of three different colors (red, yellow, and blue), each of which has different</p><p>skills. He learns, as well, to train them so that each Pikmin, regardless of</p><p>color, can grow through three different ever stronger forms: Pikmin sprout-</p><p>ing a leaf, a bud, or a flower from their heads.</p><p>His colorful Pikmin following him as his army, Captain Olimar uses them</p><p>to attack dangerous creatures, tear down stone walls, build bridges, and explore</p><p>a great many areas of the strange planet in search of the missing parts to his</p><p>spaceship. While Captain Olimar can replace killed Pikmin from remaining</p><p>Pikmin, he must, however, ensure that at no point do all his Pikmin perish—an</p><p>event called, by the game and by the child player, “an extinction event.”</p><p>It is quite a sight to watch a six-year-old, as Captain Olimar, lead a multi-</p><p>colored army of little Pikmin to fight, build, grow more Pikmin, and explore</p><p>a strange landscape, all the while solving multiple problems to discover and</p><p>get to the locations of the spaceship’s missing parts. The child then orders his</p><p>Pikmin to carry the heavy parts back to the ship. When this child’s grandfa-</p><p>ther watched him play the game for several hours, the grandfather made the</p><p>following remark, which I think captures at least one of the common mean-</p><p>ings of the playing video games is a waste of time theme: “While it may be</p><p>good for his hand-eye coordination, it’s a waste of time, because there isn’t</p><p>any content he’s learning.” I call this the problem of content.</p><p>The problem of content is, I believe, based on common attitudes toward</p><p>school, schooling, learning, and knowledge. These attitudes are compelling,</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 20</p><p>21v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>in part because they are so deeply rooted in the history of western thought,</p><p>but, nonetheless, I think they are wrong. The idea is this: Important knowl-</p><p>edge (now usually gained in school) is content in the sense of information</p><p>rooted in, or, at least, related to, intellectual domains or academic disciplines</p><p>like physics, history, art, or literature. Work that does not involve such learn-</p><p>ing is “meaningless.” Activities that are entertaining but that themselves do</p><p>not involve such learning are just “meaningless play.” Of course, video games</p><p>fall into this category.</p><p>A form of this viewpoint has long existed in western culture. It is akin</p><p>to</p><p>the viewpoint, held by Plato and Aristotle, for example, that knowledge, in</p><p>something like the sense of content above, is good in and of itself. Other pur-</p><p>suits, including making practical use of such knowledge—pursuits that do not</p><p>involve learning and reflecting on such content in and of itself outside the</p><p>realm of practical applications—are lesser; in some sense, mundane and triv-</p><p>ial. Such a view, of course, makes the grandfather’s remark about the child</p><p>playing Pikmin seem obvious.</p><p>The problem with the content view is that an academic discipline, or any</p><p>other semiotic domain, for that matter, is not primarily content, in the sense</p><p>of facts and principles. It is rather primarily a lived and historically changing</p><p>set of distinctive social practices. It is in these social practices that “content”</p><p>is generated, debated, and transformed via certain distinctive ways of think-</p><p>ing, talking, valuing, acting, and, often, writing and reading.</p><p>No one would want to treat basketball as “content” apart from the</p><p>game itself. Imagine a textbook that contained all the facts and rules about</p><p>basketball read by students who never played or watched the game. How</p><p>well do you think they would understand this textbook? How motivated to</p><p>understand it do you think they would be? But we do this sort of thing all</p><p>the time in school with areas like math and science. We even have politi-</p><p>cians and educators who condemn doing math and science in the classroom</p><p>instead of drilling-and-skilling on math and science facts (“content”) as</p><p>“permissive.”</p><p>There is, however, an alternative way to think about learning and know-</p><p>ing that makes the content view seem less obvious and natural. I turn to de-</p><p>veloping this viewpoint in the following sections. Under this alternative</p><p>perspective it will become less clear that playing video games is necessarily a</p><p>“a waste of time,” though it will be a while until I can return to that claim and</p><p>answer it directly.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 21</p><p>22 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>AN ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVE</p><p>ON LEARNING AND KNOWING</p><p>The alternative perspective starts with the claim that there really is no such</p><p>thing as learning “in general.” We always learn something. And that some-</p><p>thing is always connected, in some way, to some semiotic domain or other.</p><p>Therefore, if we are concerned with whether something is worth learn-</p><p>ing or not, whether it is a waste of time or not—video games or anything</p><p>else—we should start with questions like the following: What semiotic do-</p><p>main is being entered through this learning? Is it a valuable domain or not?</p><p>In what sense? Is the learner learning simply to understand (“read”) parts of</p><p>the domain or also to participate more fully in the domain by learning to pro-</p><p>duce (“write”) meanings in the domain? And we need to keep in mind that in</p><p>the modern world, there are a great many more potentially important semi-</p><p>otic domains than just those that show up in typical schools. I return to these</p><p>questions later in regard to the child playing Pikmin.</p><p>Once we learn to start with such questions, we find that it is often a</p><p>tricky question as to what semiotic domain is being entered when someone is</p><p>learning or has learned something. For example, consider college freshmen</p><p>who have taken their first college-level physics class, passed it with good</p><p>grades, and can write down Newton’s laws of motion. What domain have</p><p>they entered? It will not do to say “physics” and leave the matter at that,</p><p>though the content view would take this position.</p><p>Lots of studies have shown that many such students, students who can</p><p>write down Newton’s laws of motion, if asked so simple a question as “How</p><p>many forces are acting on a coin when it has been thrown up into the air?”</p><p>(the answer to which can actually be deduced from Newton’s laws) get the</p><p>answer wrong. Leaving aside friction, they claim that two forces are operat-</p><p>ing on the coin, gravity and “impetus,” the force the hand has transferred to</p><p>the coin. Gravity exists as a force and, according to Newton’s laws, is the sole</p><p>force acting on the coin when it is in the air (aside from air friction). Impetus,</p><p>in the sense above, however, does not exist, though Aristotle thought it did</p><p>and people in their everyday lives tend to view force and motion in such</p><p>terms quite naturally.</p><p>So these students have entered the semiotic domain of physics as passive</p><p>content but not as something in terms of which they can actually see and oper-</p><p>ate on their world in new ways. There may be nothing essentially wrong with</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 22</p><p>23v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>this, since their knowledge of such passive content might help them know, at</p><p>some level, what physics, an important enterprise in modern life, is “about.” I</p><p>tend to doubt this, however. Be that as it may, these students cannot produce</p><p>meanings in physics or understand them in producerlike ways.</p><p>They have not learned to experience the world in a new way. They have</p><p>not learned to experience the world in a way in which the natural inclination to</p><p>think in terms of the hand transmitting a force to the coin, a force that the coin</p><p>stores up and uses up (“impetus”), is not part of one’s way of seeing and operat-</p><p>ing on the world (for a time and place, i.e., when doing modern physics).</p><p>When we learn a new semiotic domain in a more active way, not as pas-</p><p>sive content, three things are at stake:</p><p>1. We learn to experience (see, feel, and operate on) the world in new</p><p>ways.</p><p>2. Since semiotic domains usually are shared by groups of people who</p><p>carry them on as distinctive social practices, we gain the potential to</p><p>join this social group, to become affiliated with such kinds of people</p><p>(even though we may never see all of them, or any of them, face to</p><p>face).</p><p>3. We gain resources that prepare us for future learning and problem solv-</p><p>ing in the domain and, perhaps, more important, in related domains.</p><p>Three things, then, are involved in active learning: experiencing the world in</p><p>new ways, forming new affiliations, and preparation for future learning.</p><p>This is “active learning.” However, such learning is not yet what I call</p><p>“critical learning.” For learning to be critical as well as active, one addi-</p><p>tional feature is needed. The learner needs to learn not only how to un-</p><p>derstand and produce meanings in a particular semiotic domain that are</p><p>recognizable to those affiliated with the domain, but, in addition, how to</p><p>think about the domain at a “meta” level as a complex system of interre-</p><p>lated parts. The learner also needs to learn how to innovate in the</p><p>domain—how to produce meanings that, while recognizable, are seen as</p><p>somehow novel or unpredictable.</p><p>To get at what all this really means, though, I need to discuss semiotic</p><p>domains a bit more. This will allow me to clarify what I mean by critical</p><p>learning and to explicate the notions of experiencing the world in new ways,</p><p>forming new affiliations, and preparation for future learning a bit more.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 23</p><p>24 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>MORE ON SEMIOTIC DOMAINS:</p><p>S ITUATED MEANINGS</p><p>Words, symbols, images, and artifacts have meanings that are specific to par-</p><p>ticular semiotic domains and particular situations (contexts). They do not</p><p>just have general meanings.</p><p>I was once a cannery worker; later I became an academic. I used the word</p><p>“work” in both cases, but the word meant different things in each case. In my</p><p>cannery life, it meant something like laboring for eight straight hours in</p><p>order to survive and get home to lead my “real” life. In my academic life, it</p><p>means something like chosen efforts I put into thinking, reading, writing,</p><p>and teaching as part and parcel of my vocation, efforts not clocked by an</p><p>eight-hour workday. In the domain of human romantic relationships, the</p><p>word means something else altogether; for example, in a sentence like “Rela-</p><p>tionships take work.” Later I will point out that a word like “work,” in fact,</p><p>has different meanings even within a single</p><p>domain, like the cannery, aca-</p><p>demics, or romantic relationships, meanings that vary according to different</p><p>situations in the domain.</p><p>But here we face one of the most widespread confusions that exists in re-</p><p>gard to language and semiotic domains. People tend to think that the mean-</p><p>ing of a word or other sort of symbol is a general thing—the sort of thing</p><p>that, for a word, at least, can be listed in a dictionary. But meaning for words</p><p>and symbols is specific to particular situations and particular semiotic do-</p><p>mains. You don’t really know what a word means if you don’t carefully con-</p><p>sider both the specific semiotic domain and the specific situation you are in.</p><p>We build meanings for words or symbols “on the spot,” so to speak, so as</p><p>to make them appropriate for the actual situations we are in, though we do so</p><p>with due respect for the specific semiotic domain in which we are operating.</p><p>What general meaning a word or other symbol has is just a theme around</p><p>which, in actual situations of use, we must build more specific instantiations</p><p>(meanings).</p><p>To understand or produce any word, symbol, image, or artifact in a given</p><p>semiotic domain, a person must be able to situate the meaning of that word,</p><p>symbol, image, or artifact within embodied experiences of action, interac-</p><p>tion, or dialogue in or about the domain. These experiences can be ones the</p><p>person has actually had or ones he or she can imagine, thanks to reading, dia-</p><p>logue with others, or engagement with various media. This is what our col-</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 24</p><p>25v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>lege physics students could not do: They could not situate the components of</p><p>Newton’s laws in terms of specific situations and embodied ways of seeing</p><p>and acting on and within the world from the perspective of the semiotic do-</p><p>main of mechanical physics.</p><p>Meaning, then, is both situation and domain specific. Thus, even in a sin-</p><p>gle domain, the meaning of a word varies across different situations. Let me</p><p>give an example of what I am talking about by taking up again the example of</p><p>the word “work.” In semiotic domains connected to academics, the word</p><p>“work” takes on a range of possible situated meanings different from the range</p><p>possible in other semiotic domains (e.g., law, medicine, manual work, etc.).</p><p>In one situation I might say of a fellow academic, “Her work has been</p><p>very influential” and by “work” mean her research. In another situation I</p><p>might say the same thing, but now in regard to a particular committee she</p><p>has chaired, and by “work” mean her political efforts within her discipline or</p><p>institution. To understand the word “work” in these cases, you need to ask</p><p>yourself what you take the situation to be (e.g., talk about contributions to</p><p>knowledge or about disciplinary or institutional political affairs) and what</p><p>semiotic domain is at stake (here academics, not law offices).</p><p>The same thing is true in all domains. Even in the rigorous semiotic do-</p><p>main of physics, one must situate (build) different specific meanings for the</p><p>word “light” in different situations. In different situations, one has to build</p><p>meanings for the word that involve thinking, talking about, or acting on dif-</p><p>ferent things like waves, particles, straight lines, reflection and refraction,</p><p>lasers, colors, and yet other things in other situations. Even in physics, when</p><p>someone uses the word “light,” we need to know whether they are talking</p><p>about waves or particles, colors or lasers, or something else (perhaps they are</p><p>talking about the general theory of electromagnetism)?</p><p>In a different domain altogether, the same word takes on yet different</p><p>meanings in different situations. For example, in religion, one has to build</p><p>meanings for the word “light” that involve thinking, talking about, or acting</p><p>on and with different themes like illumination, insight, life, grace, peace,</p><p>birth, and yet other things in other situations.</p><p>If you cannot even imagine the experiences and conditions of an aca-</p><p>demic life, you really can’t know what “work” means, either specifically or in</p><p>terms of its possible range of meanings, in a sentence like “Her work was very</p><p>influential.” Of course, you don’t have to be an academic to imagine aca-</p><p>demic life. But you do have to be able to build simulated worlds of experience</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 25</p><p>26 v WHAT VIDEO GAMES HAVE TO TEACH US v</p><p>in your mind (in this case, the sorts of experiences, attitudes, values, and feel-</p><p>ings an academic might have), however unconsciously you do this. And, per-</p><p>haps, you can do this because of your reading or other vicarious experiences.</p><p>Perhaps you can do it through analogies to other domains with which you are</p><p>more familiar (e.g., you might equate your hobby as an artist with the acade-</p><p>mic’s research and understand how “work” can mean, in a certain sort of situ-</p><p>ation, efforts connected to a vocation).</p><p>Why I am belaboring this point? For two reasons: first, to make clear</p><p>that understanding meanings is an active affair in which we have to reflect</p><p>(however unconsciously) on the situation and the domain we are in. And, sec-</p><p>ond, because I want to argue that learning in any semiotic domain crucially</p><p>involves learning how to situate (build) meanings for that domain in the sorts</p><p>of situations the domain involves. That is precisely why real learning is active</p><p>and always a new way of experiencing the world.</p><p>Furthermore, I want to argue later that video games are potentially par-</p><p>ticularly good places where people can learn to situate meanings through</p><p>embodied experiences in a complex semiotic domain and meditate on the</p><p>process. Our bad theories about general meanings; about reading but not</p><p>reading something; and about general learning untied to specific semiotic</p><p>domains just don’t make sense when you play video games. The games exem-</p><p>plify, in a particularly clear way, better and more specific and embodied theo-</p><p>ries of meaning, reading, and learning.</p><p>MORE ON SEMIOTIC DOMAINS:</p><p>INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL VIEWS</p><p>There are two different ways to look at semiotic domains: internally and ex-</p><p>ternally. Any domain can be viewed internally as a type of content or exter-</p><p>nally in terms of people engaged in a set of social practices. For example,</p><p>first-person shooter games are a semiotic domain, and they contain a partic-</p><p>ular type of content. For instance, as part of their typical content, such</p><p>games involve moving through a virtual world in a first-person perspective</p><p>(you see only what you are holding and move and feel as if you yourself are</p><p>holding it) using weapons to battle enemies. Of course, such games involve a</p><p>good deal more content as well. Thus we can talk about the typical sorts of</p><p>content we find in first-person shooter games. This is to view the semiotic</p><p>domain internally.</p><p>03 gee ch 2 3/13/03 12:06 PM Page 26</p><p>27v SEMIOTIC DOMAINS v</p><p>On the other hand, people actually play first-person shooter games as a</p><p>practice in the world, sometimes alone and sometimes with other people on</p><p>the Internet or when they connect several game platforms or computers to-</p><p>gether. They may also talk to other players about such games and read maga-</p><p>zines and Internet sites devoted to them. They are aware that certain people</p><p>are more adept at playing such games than are others. They are also aware</p><p>that people who are “into” such games take on a certain identity, at least</p><p>when they are involved with those games. For example, it is unlikely that</p><p>people “into” first-person shooter games are going to object to violence in</p><p>video games, though they may have strong views about how that violence</p><p>ought to function in games.</p><p>I call the group of people associated with a given semiotic domain—in</p><p>this case, first-person shooter games—an affinity group. People in an affinity</p><p>group can recognize others as more or less “insiders” to the group. They may</p><p>not see many people in the group face-to-face, but when they interact with</p><p>someone on the Internet or read something about the domain, they can rec-</p><p>ognize certain ways of thinking, acting,</p>
  • QUESTOES MATEMATICA 42314 (7)
  • QUESTOES MATEMATICA 42314 (6)
  • QUESTOES MATEMATICA 42314 (5)
  • QUESTOES MATEMATICA 42314 (4)
  • QUESTOES MATEMATICA 42314 (2)
  • QUESTOES MATEMATICA 42314 (1)
  • Questoes de matematica, passe (11)
  • Questoes de matematica, passe (10)
  • Questoes de matematica, passe (8)
  • Questoes de matematica, passe (7)
  • Questoes de matematica, passe (6)
  • Questoes de matematica, passe (5)
  • Questoes de matematica, passe (4)
  • A Sociedade da Informação e do Conhecimento se caracteriza por: a. A ausência de mudanças sociais e culturais significativas. b. A centralidad...
  • Sobre a sucessão ecológica primária, podemos afirmar: Escolha uma opção: a. Podemos citar como exemplo a recolonização de um clareira. b. Ocorre s...
  • Qual alternativa descreve o conceito de força? Questão 3Resposta a. É uma grandeza vetorial capaz de dar velocidade a corpos; pode ser definida pe...
  • Leia o texto a seguir: Um aspecto legal importante para o médico de família e comunidade é o conhecimento das diretrizes instituídas pela Portaria...
  • considere o sistema de equações simulaneas a seguir, onde ocultamos os subscritos
  • De acordo com texto,entre os maiores registros apontados pelas companhias de seguros contra o personal Trainer
  • O abuso de idosos ocorre em muitas formas, incluindo abuso físico, psicológico e sexual, bem como em exploração financeira e negligência. Esses tip...
  • No trecho mais a norte do país, encontra-se a pequena Região Hidrográfica Atlântico Nordeste Ocidental formada pelas bacias dos rios que deságuam n...
  • Fazer teste: QUESTIONÁRIO UNIDADE I Clara, que estuda em um colégio localizado na região Nordeste, participou de um concurso nacional de redação, e...
  • As empresas geralmente devem escolher a melhor localização para um empreendimento, visando otimizar recursos, logística e facilidade de distribuiçã...
  • Em nosso cotidiano há muitos sonhos às vezes até músicas estão presentes isso contribui para nossa vida seja para ligar para percepção para comunic...
  • As vanguardas europeias um conjunto de tendências que atuaram principalmente no campo das artes exerceram considerável influência sobre o Modernism...
  • As estratégias alternativas para suprimentos denotam que a empresa está se preparando para lidar com determinados períodos de instabilidade, compor...

Conteúdos escolhidos para você

33 pág.

Grátis

Assepsia e Antissepsia na Cirurgia

UNIFOR

49 pág.

Grátis

Resolução Nova Estrutura Curricular Enfermagem
425 pág.
Anamnese e Exame Físico- Avaliação diagnóstica de enfermagem no adulto compressed-ilovepdf-compressed-ilovepdf-compressed

UNIP

59 pág.
Inventário da Oferta Turística em Mocajuba - PA

UFPA

Herois-Baby-Vol 1-ilovepdf-compressed

ESTÁCIO

Perguntas dessa disciplina

Grátis

What are the pedagogical knowledge that teachers need to master to plan, implement, and evaluate the teaching and learning process effectively? I-...

Grátis

What is the objective of this learning space? a) To teach children with superdotation and high abilities about different sounds and musical instr...
What are some techniques that can be used to share experiences and promote inclusive and equitable education practices among teachers? Observation...
What is the objective of learning in this class about the history of games? Identify and observe similarities and differences between current toys...
What-Video-Games-Have-to-Teach-us-About-Learning-and-Literacy-2003.-ilovepdf-compressed - Outros (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Rueben Jacobs

Last Updated:

Views: 6056

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rueben Jacobs

Birthday: 1999-03-14

Address: 951 Caterina Walk, Schambergerside, CA 67667-0896

Phone: +6881806848632

Job: Internal Education Planner

Hobby: Candle making, Cabaret, Poi, Gambling, Rock climbing, Wood carving, Computer programming

Introduction: My name is Rueben Jacobs, I am a cooperative, beautiful, kind, comfortable, glamorous, open, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.